Daniel Coats Could Be Odd Man Out: Team Looking For A Fullback Leaves The Question Of Who Goes
Here's an interesting idea. Daniel Coats could be cut sooner rather than later; if one suspected that Coats may not last throughout the season.
The Bengals are actively looking for a fullback, even inviting that crazy helmet bashing on forehead fullback Owen Schmitt this Tuesday. Considering the search for a fullback isn't to replace a position already on the roster, or generally finding improvements on the practice squad with Schmitt being in the mix (who would be ineligible) already holding up residence on the eight-man scout team, the Bengals will need to free up a roster spot on the 53-man roster.
And in truth, there's only two areas they could address.
At first, I thought about Frostee Rucker, who made the team because the Bengals took nine defensive linemen; it's likely that he'd be the first lineman cut if the Bengals elect to keep only eight defensive linemen. However, with Jonathan Fanene dealing with a hamstring issue, Robert Geathers missing four preseason games due to injury and Antwan Odom in the appeals process for violating the league's substance policy, the team needs Rucker as an insurance policy. And in truth, when he plays, he's a very solid contributor.
So again, there's two areas on the roster the team could be flexible at.
When Brian Leonard returns, or feels healthy enough to play, the team could release Cedric Peerman. Even so, I'm suspicious of that, considering from the sounds of it, Leonard still has some work to do. "Once I get my confidence back doing really hard, sharp cuts," Leonard said, "I haven't done a ton of that. I did some today. Once I get that back I'll be ready." Let's pretend that Leonard does return. The Bengals will still want an insurance policy in case Leonard has a set-back. They'll need Peerman, considering there's no running backs on the team's eight-man practice squad.
That leaves tight end. Since the team didn't keep a fullback or sign one heading into the first weekend of the regular season, Daniel Coats could be the odd man out, because he made the team based on his blocking ability and experience as a fullback. If the team signs a fullback, there's little need for Coats because his role would be distributed to a new fullback and the remaining tight ends.
Granted, this would leave the team with two active tight ends, not including long-snapper Clark Harris. If there's a need for a third, they could sign Chase Coffman off the practice squad once their defensive line stabilizes and their confidence in Leonard's health increases. Of course, we're just speculating.
Either way, we know that the Bengals are still looking for a fullback and that Cincinnati will have to free up a roster spot if someone is signed.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I realy don't care who goes
the Bengals need a true fullback in order to run like they did last year.
Any news on how the shcmitt workout went?!?!?!
I really want us to pick this guy up i mean schmitt!
has not happened yet
next Tuesday
"wherever Brad St. Louis is and Shayne Graham is about to be." -R.F. Mehl
Skuta?
I know he’s really versatile but since he’s not playing FB now (which was his biggest ticket onto the team) his only real value is in Teams.
"Before I write I let my mind go blind and let the Lord do His thing. " -Tupac Shakur
"Opportunity is missed by most people because it looks like work." -Thomas Edison
Skuta
Skutas value is as one of our only returning proven special teams player. If they would have kept another special teams player like Hebert or Jentey than Skuta would be more expendable but now him and Brandon Johnson are our two best special teams players. Coats wont play much at tight end and once we have a fullback hes useless at fullback. I think hes less important to the team than Skuta.
Skuta, Peerman Stay / Coats Gone
I agree Coats is the logical one to be odd man out. Peerman is the insurance back that we need considering we had to use Larry Johnson last year and no way everyone stays healthy in our running attack. To much pounding at the RB posistion to not want the insurance and Peerman is a really good young back that we don’t want to lose. Skuta is so valuable and has proven that he can play with the big boys and would be stolen quickly by another team if every offered. Coats is Coats, Chase should have made the final roster over him just from the practices I watched. Coats has let us down and he will again. Hes broke in the head just like Shank Graham was. If we need an extra blocker we can put Roland or Mathis in motion like last year.
It's hard to believe that Coffman stunk up the field that badly
They released him pretty early I thought. I like the idea of Coats going bye bye and if it means a crazy helmet basher fullback to plow holes for Benson, then so be it.
2010 - The Year of the Tiger.
I like Coats.
He’s a really good blocker. And he caught most of the balls thrown his way this preseason, so I think his hands have improved.
2 TE’s isn’t good. That position can take a pounding going over the middle a lot and also trying to block LB’s.
Oh, and if you run the ball a lot you need a good blocker. On 3rd and inches do you want Gresham or Coats in there to help lead Ced while he pounds it through the line?
"Before I write I let my mind go blind and let the Lord do His thing. " -Tupac Shakur
"Opportunity is missed by most people because it looks like work." -Thomas Edison
I might not want Gresham to help lead Ced, but
I think if everyone thinks its a run there is gresham over the middle behind the linebackers trying to stuff the hole.
2010 - The Year of the Tiger.
Gresham did well blocking in preseason
Maybe not as well as some more experienced but I thought it was pointed out at how well he was blocking.
by Oregonbengalsfan on Sep 12, 2010 12:55 AM EDT up reply actions
HE IS CALLED THE REVEREND\
J.P.WILL HAVE THE MIDDLE
by darth zalmer on Sep 12, 2010 1:07 AM EDT up reply actions

by 

























