Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: 7 Important Questions About The Heat Vs. Celtics Series

Six-Pack Of Hu-Dey: Is Cincinnati's Game Against Baltimore A Must-Win?

IT'S TIME TO ESTABLISH THE RUN. Carson Palmer's 50 pass attempts against New England was understandable. Anytime you solemnly walk into the lockerroom with 24-3 half time deficit, you're going to air the football in the second half. That's just the natural order of things. However, in the first half against New England, Benson was the team's only running back to record a rush attempt. If you include Carson Palmer's sneaks and roll outs, the Bengals ran the football 13 times against 20 passes (one of which was a sack). And when Benson did rush the football, he only averaged 2.8 yards/rush.

We're not saying that the team's lack of effective running doomed Cincinnati from the start last week -- I still believe that title belongs to the defense. However, the team will have to establish a far more effective rushing attack if they're going to get their season going and that begins with the Baltimore Ravens this weekend.

During both wins over the Ravens last season, Bengals running back Cedric Benson averaged 118.5 yards rushing on 30.5 rush attempts, recording a rushing touchdown in each game. Admittedly the Bengals defense carried the bulk of the team's sweep last season against Baltimore, only allowing the Ravens offense to average 236 yards total between both contests. Still, the team's rushing attack averaged over six first downs on the ground, killing the clock with 34:19 in the first content and an impressive 40 minutes of ball control to complete the season sweep.

Cincinnati's success last year was a result of the team's rushing offense. The weapons added this year, such as Jermaine Gresham, Terrell Owens and Jordan Shipley were brought in to make the passing offense more effective and balance everything out. But if this team can't get the rushing offense going, they could be in trouble.

JONATHAN FANENE INJURY WILL HURT. File this under "Mr. Obvious Makes An Impressive Observation." Reports surfaced yesterday that Bengals defensive lineman Jonathan Fanene could miss up to five weeks with a hamstring tear.

Fanene: The most underrated, under-appreciated and outside Bengals obsessionism, unknown player on this squad.

Joe Reedy called that a conservative estimate, saying Fanene's time could be about two weeks.

Losing Fanene will hurt this defense. It's not that he's irreplaceable, no one is. Fanene plays across the defensive line and does it effectively. Aside from Antwan Odom's explosion against the Green Bay Packers last year, Fanene is arguably the team's most productive pass rusher on the defensive line.

With Fanene being out, we'll have to observe the unknowns. We figure that Michael Johnson will rotate more snaps at defensive end than he did against the Patriots (all snaps were at linebacker). However, if there is a Fanene "replacement" on this team, one could look at Carlos Dunlap, who has the athleticism of a defensive end, though the size to work inside during nickel packages. Frostee Rucker could be a suitable replacement as a utility defensive lineman and he always seems to be effective when he actually gets on the field; but he doesn't have the overall production pedigree as Fanene has.

THE GENERATION GAP. The Bengals have two sets of weapons in the passing game that come from two different age groups. Terrell Owens and Chad Ochocinco aren't just the starting wide receivers, they are the veterans, combing for 19 receptions for 212 yards and a touchdown against the Patriots.

On the other hand, Jermaine Gresham and Jordan Shipley, two rookies, are making their own noise, recording a combined 11 receptions for 107 yards receiving.

There really shouldn't be a reason that with Cincinnati's arsenal of weapons that the Bengals offense ever struggles.

COVERAGE AND RETURN TEAMS NEED TO SHOW UP. Bengals special teams coach Darrin Simmons remains irate after the team's performance against New England.

“I’m still pissed off,” Simmons said on Thursday. “The 11 guys that are on the field, it’s their job to make a play and it’s my job to put them in position to make a play and we failed on both accounts.”

Along with giving up a touchdown on kickoff to open the second half, the Bengals coverage on kickoff left a lot to be designed, with two of the Bengals five kickoffs resulting in a starting field position beyond the 30-yard for New England's offense. Considering the Patriots punted one time -- which was downed -- the Bengals didn't have a punt return game. However, the kickoff return game was just as poor, with no returns going further than Adam Jones' team-leading 19-yard return early in the first quarter.

PLAYOFF CHANCES REMAIN THE SAME. With Cincinnati having to deal with New England and Baltimore out of the gate this season, there's a chance that Cincinnati could start the season 0-2. I'm not saying that they will, considering Cincinnati's recent history against Baltimore favors the Bengals with better matchups than what the Jets brought against the Ravens. Still, it's the NFL. Anything can happen (see: gate, nipple).

Since 2002, when the league went through realignment, 57.3% (55 of 96) of all playoff teams began the year either at 1-1 or 0-2 and four of the past nine Super Bowl champions didn't have a perfect record after the first two weeks of the season. In 2008, three teams started the season 0-2 and ended up making the playoffs (Miami Dolphins, Minnesota Vikings, San Diego Chargers). On the other hand, last year, no playoff team started the season winless through the first two weeks.

Alternatively, all four Super Bowl participants in the past two years started the season with an undefeated 2-0 record.

...BUT IS SUNDAY A MUST-WIN GAME? If the Bengals go 0-2, there would still be little reason to panic. Calling Sunday's game a "must-win" could be premature, but it might be accurate too.

It's not that Cincinnati's deficit towards the playoff would be too much to overcome. Many good teams go through a brief struggle during an NFL season and Sunday's loss to the Patriots looked more like a monumental struggle to get themselves ready for a regular season game rather than simply lacking talent. And one could argue that struggling early is better than struggling late when you're fighting to make the playoffs.

But there's no excuses now, facing the Baltimore Ravens who beat a team that Cincinnati couldn't compete against last year in the New York Jets. Once Cincinnati hits their week six bye, the Bengals will have a stretch of games against the Steelers, Colts, Jets, Saints, Ravens and Chargers.

Calling Sunday's game a must-win could be premature, but in reality Cincinnati's tough schedule keeps that margin for losses at a minimum and they need to keep division tie-breakers in their court.

Note: If you're like a topic to be examined, email us at JoshKirkendall [at] gmail [dot] com.

Comment 23 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Not a must win but...

I agree I don’t think this is a must win, but it is a game where we must compeate. We cannot come out looking falt on offense and defense like we did in the first half last week.

by onehotjordan on Sep 17, 2010 10:13 AM EDT reply actions  

Yes it is

We have the fourth toughest schedule. We need to win as many division early as possible. This will help us later in the season when injuries start adding up.

by DonMegga on Sep 17, 2010 10:23 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

I agree with you that we need to win as many division games a possiable, but I don’t think you can call a week 2 game a must win, make or break your season type of game.

by onehotjordan on Sep 17, 2010 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

I can call it that

if it’s a home game against your biggest division rival. A loss may not keep us out of the postseason, but it’s almost certainly an early end to our reign as division champs.

() _ ()
(='.'=) This is bunny.
(") (")

by Pardon_My_French on Sep 17, 2010 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

You’re both part right, I think. It’s not really a must win. But it’s a very badly need to win.

We very badly need to win this game. There are too many very tough games coming up in midseason or later and we need to have a bit of a cushion in case we fall flat against the truly elite teams (which, unfortunately, we aren’t yet). But we’re a good team, and we need to play like it instead of like a UFL or college team.

But Baltimore is not “truly” elite. Good, yes, elite, no. And even if they were, it’s still a division game, division games are always tougher than they “should” be and upsets are rather frequent. So we have a good chance. And we need to take advantage of it.

by FriarBob on Sep 17, 2010 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

it is a must win or we're eliminated game?

of course not, lets not be obtuse.

but common sense would suggest that being 2 games back of the ravens, with them controlling the tie breaker and having home field advantage against us in the final week of the season, will be a monstrous hole to climb out of.

if the bengals lose sunday, don’t take a second mortgage on your home to place a bet on the bengals making the playoffs. because from a statistical standpoint, the odds will be against us.

"wherever Brad St. Louis is and Shayne Graham is about to be." -R.F. Mehl

by palewook on Sep 17, 2010 11:13 AM EDT reply actions  

Basically

Sunday isn’t a must-win game but we really need the win? I’d say that’s a good description.

Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.

by Josh Kirkendall on Sep 17, 2010 11:17 AM EDT reply actions  

I don't think the Ravens looked that good against the Jets.

They had lotsa turnovers and their running game got stuffed. The only way they moved the chains were from Jets errors. I think we will be more potent on offense then the Jets, and if our D decides to play the opposite of the way they did in NE then we should beat em. I saw a lot of check downs by Flacco again.

Every game is a must win game when playing a division opponent.

by TCfromDubVee on Sep 17, 2010 11:58 AM EDT reply actions  

here's what the ravens think about week 2

will take a minute to load

"wherever Brad St. Louis is and Shayne Graham is about to be." -R.F. Mehl

by palewook on Sep 17, 2010 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can’t believe anybody would actually have time to READ all that… much less actually write it.

by FriarBob on Sep 17, 2010 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

I haven't read them in a long time,

but if I remember correctly, about 2/3 of it never changes/updates season stats.

"Give us 10 points and the game is over...And they didn't score on us. Make sure you quote that. They didn't score on our defense."

"Ray Lewis has lost a step? I don't think so, Ray Lewis is still the best linebacker in football."-JH

by organizedchaos52 on Sep 17, 2010 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

Everyone’s going bonkers about how great they are. They looked like they took advantage of a mistake-prone offense to win a low-scoring game. Whoop-dee-freakin’-doo.

() _ ()
(='.'=) This is bunny.
(") (")

by Pardon_My_French on Sep 17, 2010 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jets errors

meaning Cro/Wilson’s inability to cover? And/or not covering Heap on 3rd down? Flacco completed 8 of 12 passes for 8 first downs on 3rd down plays.

I agree your offense will be more potent. A college offense could be more potent than anything lead by Schottenheimer and Sanchize. And if your D were to play opposite the way they did last week, I think you’d walk all over us. But I don’t think they’ll play that well.

I dunno what game you watched. Flacco rarely checked down, choosing instead to throw plenty of deep passes, and even completing a few.

"Give us 10 points and the game is over...And they didn't score on us. Make sure you quote that. They didn't score on our defense."

"Ray Lewis has lost a step? I don't think so, Ray Lewis is still the best linebacker in football."-JH

by organizedchaos52 on Sep 17, 2010 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'll take my check down comment back...

I thought he through more passes to Rice. Though by Jets mistakes i mean getting flagged every pass for a pass interference. On more then one occasion they had you stopped on 3rd and long and gave it to you on a penalty.

I don’t think you looked good at all for having all those new weapons.

Will be a close game none the less.

by TCfromDubVee on Sep 17, 2010 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Who keeps saying

that all of Michael Johnson’s snaps last week were at LB. Go back and watch the game. His first snap didn’t come until 5:14 left in the first quarter and it was at defensive end. His next snap came at 2:38 left in the first quarter and it again was at defensive end. Maybe Reedy was confused with Brandon Johnson.

by kacymcbryant18 on Sep 17, 2010 12:50 PM EDT reply actions  

Possible. I'm using Reedy's chart.

Was MJ in a two or three point stance?

Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.

by Josh Kirkendall on Sep 17, 2010 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Three point stance

I’m 100 percent positive that he was in there as a DE. I can go back and chart all of his snaps for you if you like.

by kacymcbryant18 on Sep 17, 2010 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's pretty close to must win

and if they get blown out the season’s over. Good teams don’t get crushed.

by occams_tiger_teeth on Sep 17, 2010 2:16 PM EDT reply actions  

stupid

anyone who says any game in week two is a must-win is an idiot. I’ve heard three different talking heads refer to three different games this week as must win, and every one deserves a solid kick in the yarbles. If they have any yarbles.

by indesignkat on Sep 17, 2010 8:35 PM EDT reply actions  

starting 0-2

giving away home-field advantage in the final game of the season, and 2 potential tie breakers to a team you could end tied with, isn’t an idiot concern.

its a realistic issue the bengals will be facing if they lose to the ravens this week.

is the season mathematically over if the bengals lose sunday, no. of course not. are we behind the 8-ball. yes.

"wherever Brad St. Louis is and Shayne Graham is about to be." -R.F. Mehl

by palewook on Sep 18, 2010 7:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hold on

bq “There really shouldn’t be a reason that with Cincinnati’s arsenal of weapons that the Bengals offense ever struggles.”

I’ve got to completely disagree with this. You can’t use the weapons unless the line gives you time or opens the holes. The Bengals will win or lose based on how their line plays game to game. I know that sounds obvious, but then again ….

by GrizzlyRider on Sep 18, 2010 10:08 PM EDT reply actions  

Heres a fun fact.....

Fifty-four different teams since 1990 have started 0-2 by losing to two teams that would finish with a winning record. Of those 54, only three of them made the playoffs: 2002 Pittsburgh Steelers, 2007 New York Giants, and 2008 Miami Dolphins. Overall, 13% (22 of 169) teams that started 0-2 made the playoffs.

Most teams that start 0-2 do so because they are bad and the Bungholes are no exception.

by Let's be Realistic here! on Sep 19, 2010 12:31 AM EDT reply actions  

You give all Ravens fans a bad name.

You started out with exactly what you stated “a fun fact”. But why could you not keep you comment objective and mature? Why must you resort to childish name calling? And out of curiosity I took a look at your profile because you can learn alot about some people by what you see them commenting on their own teams blog. Only thing is, you haven’t commented on Baltimore Beatdown. You joined Beatdown 2 days after joining the Jungle. You are obviously just a fan that likes to disrespect fans of other teams. But also let me say that I wish I could say my team doesn’t have fans like you, but I am not homerish enough to believe that to be the case.

by Oregonbengalsfan on Sep 19, 2010 4:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Cincinnati Bengals.

Editor-In Chief

Cj_small Josh Kirkendall

Editor/Managing Editor

Rudiblanket_small Anthony Cosenza

5255_133614603784_666578784_2414703_1976100_n_small Jason Garrison

Authors

Photo_3_small BeerRun

010511170110_small Joe Goodberry

40297_422933299865_509514865_4658259_6466915_n_small Ryan Harper

Small Brennen Warner

Sb_nation_small Jack Cassidy

580551_10150822857707018_613867017_11694254_1239726425_n_small Nick_Crago

Img_0783_small Mike Fightmaster

Moderators

Nfl palewook

680764146_0eac16fabd_small 80%OFTHETIMEIMRIGHTEVERYTIME

Tawky_tawny_small UpStateMike

Joeb698_86e260_small joeb69

Bengals_stamp_by_jamaal10_small Doc Scratch