If you wanted a statistic to accurately summarize the quarterback play in Sunday's win over Baltimore, that statistic would essentially say, "Carson Palmer was bad, but Joe Flacco was worse." I think I found that statistic (I hope nobody has mentioned it in one of the open threads; if so, my bad).
Consider the following: Palmer was just 16 for 35, while Flacco threw four interceptions to the Cincinnati defense.
Result: 20 percent (one-fifth) of the passes caught by Bengals Sunday were thrown by Joe Flacco. Sort of sums up the passing game for both teams, doesn't it?
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Cincy Jungle's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Cincy Jungle's writers or editors.