This Week Versus Last Week
This past week, the Bengals bounced back from a tough loss against the New England Patriots and beat their division rival Baltimore Ravens. The Bengals defense came back in a big way and chased Joe Flacco all over the field causing him to throw four interceptions including one to Adam Jones. The offense sputtered at times but they still managed to move the ball into field goal range five times so new kicker Mike Nugent could go 5-5 and score the Bengals their 15 points.
This week, the Bengals take a trip to Charlotte, NC to take on the Carolina Panthers who will be starting rookie quarterback Jimmy Clausen for the first time against the tough Bengals defense. The Bengals are favored to beat the Panthers by three. Let's see how the Panthers match up against the Bengals compared to how the Ravens did.
Joe Flacco VS Jimmy Clausen:
Do we even really need to do this? Of course I'm going to say that Flacco is better. Maybe eventually Clausen will be the better quarterback but Flacco has been in the league longer and he's been to the playoffs and he's been to the AFC Championship game. Clausen hasn't done any of that. The Bengals may not have the best record against rookie quarterbacks but I don't think that will stop the Bengals from taking care of business this Sunday.
Winner: Joe Flacco
What the Bengals need to do:
So, remember what I said about how the Bengals defense had Flacco running for his life throughout the game? Well, that's exactly what they need to do to Clausen this Sunday. The front four need to apply just as much pressure as they did against Baltimore and Mike Zimmer needs to apply the pressure from linebackers and the secondary liberally. If they can at least knock Clausen around for a while and keep him from feeling comfortable in the pocket, they could seriously damage his calm and cause him to throw a couple interceptions. Can you say "pick-6?"
Panthers Running Game VS Baltimore Running Game:
For the most part, the Bengals defense contained Ray Rice. They held him to 87 yards on the ground and 30 reception yards but the biggest news is that they kept him out of the end zone. Rice has proven to be one of the more elusive backs in the NFL since his debut in 2008. On top of dealing with Rice, the Ravens have Le'Ron McClain and the very talented Willis McGahee that the Ravens use in different packages. This weekend, the Bengals have just as big of a threat to deal with in the form of DeAngelo Williams and Jonathan Stewart which has proven to be one of the NFL's most deadly running back duos over the past couple seasons.
Winner: Panthers Running Game
What the Bengals need to do:
Surprised? I am actually a little surprised that I picked the Panthers too but DeAngelo Williams is one of the better running backs in the league and few running backs compliment each other the way Williams and Stewart do. Williams is the work horse and Stewart is a speedy change of pace guy who is just as deadly catching the ball out of the backfield as he is taking handoffs. To stop this dynamic duo, the Bengals should stack the box. The Panthers will probably have a very run-heavy offensive game plan in order to protect Clausen from getting his feelings hurt too much. The Bengals should know this coming in and apply a lot of pressure with linebackers and safeties along with the defensive line in order to stop the run. Once they do that, they will force Clausen to throw the ball. But throw the ball to who?
Panthers Receivers VS Ravens Receivers:
Steve Smith is one of the better receivers in the NFL. He's coming into his tenth season as the Panthers number one receiver and in those ten seasons, he's had over 1,000 yards in five of them. He'll keep either Leon Hall's or Jonathan Joseph's hands really full throughout the game. The problem with the Panthers is that when it comes to their wide receivers, not only is Steve Smith the best option to throw to but he's also kind of the only option. Steve Smith may be better than Baltimore receivers T.J. Housmandzadeh, Derrick Mason and Anquan Boldin but Carolina doesn't have three slightly less talented Steve Smiths to throw to.
Winner: Ravens
What the Bengals need to do:
This one is simple. Stick Steve Smith. Hall and Joseph are both perfectly capable of doing the job. If you take away the running game and force a rookie quarterback to throw, that rookie quarterback may want to keep his eye open for his most talented receiver. If you can successfully take that option away, you seriously disrupt that rookie quarterback's ability to move the ball because you force him to look at other options and deal with pressure at the same time. When it comes to quarterbacks, coaches usually have the theory walk before you can run. Well unfortunately for Clausen, he doesn't have time to walk, he's got to run right away and if the Bengals play their cards right, they'll have Clausen crawling by the end of the game.
Panthers Defense VS Ravens Defense:
Ray Lewis, Haloti Ngata and Terrell Suggs play for the Ravens and not the Panthers.
Winner: Ravens Defense
What the Bengals need to do:
The Bengals need to do what they tried to do against the Ravens and what they did in the second half against the Patriots. Run the ball up the middle with Cedric Benson and use Bernard Scott as a change of pace guy and throw the ball just as much as they run it. Use the play fake to keep the defense honest and on it's toes. Not many teams have the talent to cover Chad Ochocinco, Terrell Owens, Jordan Shipley and Jermaine Gresham. The Panthers don't have it so the Bengals should make them pay. Establish the run early and force the Panthers to cheat up and then burn them deep. If the Bengals can do that, Palmer, Ochocinco and Benson can make their fantasy owners very happy.
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don't agree with the Panthers running game being better.
Their running BACKS are better but their running GAME isn’t as good in my opinion. The OL for the Ravens is much better.
"Before I write I let my mind go blind and let the Lord do His thing. " -Tupac Shakur
"Opportunity is missed by most people because it looks like work." -Thomas Edison
Based on what? 2 games during Carolina's QB carousel?
Look at the numbers over the last 2 years. Carolina edged Baltimore both years. And they set history last year by having 2 backs go over 1100 yards.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
by southtunnel on Sep 21, 2010 10:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Technically speaking, the OL isn’t part of the running game, because they don’t run the ball. They also aren’t part of the passing game, because they don’t pass (or catch) the ball.
They are, however, a critical contributing factor.
I dunno. I think Rice is a good RB but until he steps up and really performs (maybe this week?) I have to say Carolina. Even with as crappy as they’ve looked so far this year. That makes it close. But I still give them the nod. For now, at least.
I don't understand what you said
The OL is a critical contributing factor in the run and passing game but isn’t part of it? By definition “factor” is a “component: an abstract part of something”
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
by southtunnel on Sep 21, 2010 10:19 PM EDT up reply actions
-1
Most people rate a running game by either yards per game or yards per carry.
In either case Carolina is better than Baltimore.
2010 yards per game:
Carolina 104
Baltimore 79
2010 yards per carry:
Carolina 3.6
Baltimore 2.7
2009 yards per game:
Carolina 156
Baltimore 137
2009 yards per carry:
Carolina 4.8
Baltimore 4.7
I’m sorry…i just one of those jerks who like to use FACTS to shoot down stupid statements.
FIRE BRATSUCKSKI
Didn’t see it coming did ya! Only way Bengals will not win is if Brat snatches defeat from the jaws of victory. Stand on their necks & don’t let them up! Run up the score! Kick them while they are down! Innovation & discipline is the fundamental keys to victory, elementary answers to a simple problem. Wonder what the offense would look like with Charlie Weiss running it! Huuummmmmm?? We had a chance!
by Vman in Germany on Sep 21, 2010 8:52 PM EDT reply actions
Sorry dude, but you didn't do your homework on Carolina's running game
Williams is the work horse and Stewart is a speedy change of pace guy who is just as deadly catching the ball out of the backfield as he is taking hand-offs
Both of these guys are top 10 RBs. But it’s actually the exact opposite. Williams is smaller, faster and shiftier. Stewart is the hammer but also has speed. And actually when they are throwing often (like this year due to a sucky passing game), it’s the 3rd string RB Mike Goodson who is catching out of the backfield. I’m sure you’ve never heard of him, he is very green… but trust me, he is every bit a homerun threat as DeAngelo and Stewart is. Maybe more so since they have recently figured out how to get him the ball in space. He’s one of only a few bright spots on this Panther team.
Don’t expect to be chasing Clausen too much. He won’t be asked to do much. And when he is pressured he’s great at avoiding it and either throwing the ball away or quickly hitting his checkdown.
Write it down… If your d-line is in the backfield often again, then expect many dumps offs to Goodson, and potentially a breakout game from him.
on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city
There is one thing I heard this morning on the way to wotk that concerns me
Crocker was on the radio saying that he doesn’t think Clauson is much of a threat because he is a rookie. Hell, I don’t know, maybe he isn’t but it seems to me that if we don’t view him as one there is more of a chance he will be. These next 5 games are critical to our season. It is probably the easiest stretch of the schedule and we need to make hay. If we play like we are capable of playing the next 5 games all against teams we need to beat. I don’t expect us to win more than 4 games in the second half. We need 6 of the first 8 if we expect to go to the playoffs. If by the grace of God we win 7, and we can, our chances improve greatly. But not if we don’t take every opponent very seriously. Carolina can beat us if we don’t give maximum effort.
"If we always agree, one of us is not necessary"
The guy was drafted for a reason. He has always had the tools. Execution is another story. I think any random QB that gets thrown in there is a threat. Any Given Sunday really rings true here. A downtrodden franchise that is a couple years removed from winning, savior QB comes in after a horrific start to the season. I just don’t want to see the Bengals be on the wrong end of a good debut.
Definitely
We need to come out fast and set the right tone so that Carolina doesn’t get a spark from Clausen. Squash hope early against opponents you should beat.
Nice post Mr. Garrison, I like the format too
I can’t disagree with any of your ‘winners’. Some comments I might add are keep an eye on RB Mike Goodson. He’s been very effective catching balls out of the backfield.
The Panthers run defense has played well. We don’t have the Ravens front 4 but we have some adequate fat guys and very good LB’s! But you don’t need to be able to run first to abuse our secondary. The Panthers have struggled to get pressure on the QB so Palmer should have time to pick it apart.
TE Jermaine Gresham is a good play in fantasy this week.
I have Gresham in this week!
I don’t think this game is going to be a pushover by any means. At least for the first half. These teams don’t play each other very much and it may take a little time for each team to adjust. Normally that would mean both sides could rack up some early points, but with the Bengals, they might opt for grind it out ball control and the score could be something like 10-7 by halftime.
2010 - The Year of the Tiger.
RE: Gresham
Thinking about starting Gresham over Vernon Davis this week….any thoughts?
it comes down to mind over matter....if you don't mind, it won't matter
In my leagues I either have davis, celek, or gates
And Gresham isn’t used enough to warrant starting him over those players. Course Celek hasn’t done much this year so I could start Gresham over Celek.
by Oregonbengalsfan on Sep 22, 2010 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions

by 

























