NFL Roster Cuts: Why Dezmon Briscoe Won't Be Claimed Through Waivers
It's true. There will likely be one or two teams that take a long hard look at Bengals wide receiver Dezmon Briscoe. In truth, I'd find it hard to believe that the country's annual event for most recorded layoffs in a single day, isn't followed up with mostly every player being examined extensively. Briscoe will not be the exception here; he'll be one of many. There will always be the chance that he's claimed off waivers with his Cincinnati career coming to an end. But we have to wonder about those chances.
With a staggering hesitation move that blew away his opposing cornerback, giving him enough separation to get behind the entire Colts secondary, Briscoe hauled in a 50-yard touchdown pass with 6:18 left in the game. While the route was flawless and the reception solid, before catching that pass, Briscoe only recorded three receptions for 39 yards receiving through the preceding four preseason games.
In truth, it appeared that the Bengals hid Briscoe as best they could, increasing the chances that he'll clear waivers and sign with the team's practice squad. It's entirely possible that other teams could have his college scouting report in their hand (much like how we've formed our own opinions on Briscoe), looking through the waiver wire, plucking him up this weekend. However, with the lack of overall production in the preseason, teams may not think Briscoe is NFL ready to place him on their 53-man roster. With other receivers showing far more production on tape, teams could find more appealing players that they feel are ready to play the opening weekend.
Also consider this. If there were 31 others teams that could pluck Briscoe from the waiver wire, then keep in mind that those 31 other teams also passed on Briscoe through five rounds. If they didn't pick him up during the NFL draft, then what has Briscoe done during the preseason to warrant a waiver claim?
36 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
He'll clear waivers
I don’t think it’ll be a problem.
To be honest
I’m not absolutely convinced that the Bengals won’t keep him on the 53-man roster. Which would be interesting, because it could literally put Caldwell on the block. Interesting though, I suppose.
Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Josh Kirkendall on Sep 3, 2010 11:31 AM EDT reply actions
I'm all for that
There are some teams that need WRs right now…if we could trade Caldwell for an average OT/OG or FS, I’d be thrilled.
by Big Sky Bengal on Sep 3, 2010 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions
Interesting how a specific user posted about a
Interesting how somebody posted on this site about a month ago or so how he thought Caldwell should be traded. He got zero positive comments on his post. Everybody bashed him for spraying nonsense and haven’t seen him since. How things come around eh?
I'm Surprised
I followed Dez’s career at KU and he seemed to get better every year. I didn’t think he’d last that long in the draft and I definitely didn’t think there would be a chance he wouldn’t make your 53. Is your depth that good that Dez can’t get on the field or is he just not performing?
Worst idea ever to keep Simpson instead of Briscoe
First of all, I don’t think that the “3 receptions for 39 yards” is completely accurate. I seem to remember him having at least 3 catches yesterday alone. Secondly, his 50 yard catch was a more productive play than anything Simpson has done in 3 seasons. If they don’t keep Briscoe on the 53-man roster, he’s as good as gone. Finally, look at their field awareness. Simpson is so lost out there. There’s WAY more upside and less work with Briscoe than there is with Simpson.
by Anthony Cosenza on Sep 3, 2010 12:21 PM EDT reply actions
I agree it would be stupid to release this guy
If he’s even a average STs player I think you have to keep him around
IMO
Yep
3 years later he can’t see the field or play special teams. Hell, Purify with his suspension and limited WR abilites are more valuable than Simpson.
by Anthony Cosenza on Sep 3, 2010 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions
Chargers
Are desperate for WR depth. They dont even have a guy locked into their 4th spot let alone 5th. On a side note you guys expected to release any young cheap decent OGs or OTs?
IMO
Josh you write a persuading argument
but.. I have to think someone will pick him up on waivers. He shows too much upside from his college career alone. There are teams lacking WR depth right now and I can see them taking a look at him. Frankly, i would not risk it and would rather cut simpson loose.
Upside?
Based on what? Just because he’s a rookie and had a mildly decent college career at Kansas (oooh) why keep him around just to spend the next two years developing into the next Andre Caldwell (minus the top end speed). I say cut him and try to sign him to the PS. If he get’s claimed, find another warm body to take his place…
by bengaljohnboy on Sep 3, 2010 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions
And Simpson has more upside?
“Kansas (Ooooh)”? Yeah, because we all know that Coastal freaking Carolina is a football factory. Give me a break.
by Anthony Cosenza on Sep 3, 2010 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions
If he is so great
Then why wasn’t he taken rounds before we picked him off the scrap heap. The perfect time to make impulse decisions on college film material is at the draft, if people didn’t believe in him then, what has he shown the last four months that he’s any different?
His agent will try
to find a team to add him before accepting the PS.
But there’s a LOT of competition on cut day. With all the experienced WRs available who have had success in the past, it’ll be pretty hard for a rookie to latch on with a 53.
Check the other teams fan blog sites and you won’t read a peep of ‘hey Briscoe might get waived by the Bengals.’.
Reedy thinks
They drop quan to keep briscoe. To me, that’s a mistake.
RIP Slim.
by brandone on Sep 3, 2010 12:44 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Agree completely.
They NEED to keep Quan and Briscoe. Simpson needs to go.
by Anthony Cosenza on Sep 3, 2010 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions
It depends
I’d like to keep both, and at this point I feel Caldwell is the most expendable. Simpson is a better fit for Palmer but dez is a polished route runner and in a few years, he could be the new Chad.
RIP Slim.
by brandone on Sep 3, 2010 12:59 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I think he is right and we should let QC go. Briscoe can be inactive and learn and he can come back next year and contend for the fourth WR spot. Simpson has shown this preseason he can play good against second string guys at least and make big plays which is who he will be playing against if he comes out as the fourth or fifth reciever. It will be bottom of the chart CBs. QC is great on ST but we have two good Punt Returners who averaged more and lots of people who return kicks. Hes a great talent but if briscoe is as good as people say, he is expendable.
But you have to realize
Quan is a big reason why those guys are having such good returns. If you watch replays of most of the big ones, Cosby has a key block to spring them.
RIP Slim.
by brandone on Sep 3, 2010 2:00 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
It seems to me that any anti-Simpson talk is reflexive. SImpson ended the Preseason tied for second in catches, had the most yards, and tied for the most TDs, and remains the second youngest WR on the Roster, to me that earns him another chance.
Briscoe is very young, and I would like to see his development.
Shipley is awesome.
Cosby has earned a spot on the team from his teams efforts and production in the preseason.
Chad and TO are stars.
Caldwell had limited production this preseason. He was the second best reciever on the team by the last regular season game, but was still only productive early in the year as the 4th reciever. Last season the recievers were bad enough that the team brought in enough draft picks and free agents to fill the roster. TO me Caldwell ends up the odd man out.
I agree
I’m not seeing anything from Caldwell that shows he should be kept instead of these other guys who can stretch the field.
by Throw the ball on Sep 3, 2010 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions
In a perfect world
we would keep Briscoe Simpson and Cosby, and trade Caldwell for a 5th round pick or something. Reality is that this administration has rarely done the right thing. What’s going to happen is that we are going to keep Caldwell, Simpson, and Cosby, we will put Briscoe on waivers, at which point he’ll be taken by team desperate for some WR depth and will have a flourishing career outside Cincinnati. This year won’t be impacted by that decision but we’ll let Simpson walk next year and be banging our heads against the walls because Briscoe will be then seen as a solid #2 receiver in a team that was smart enought to claim him off waivers.
Surprise cuts and acquisitions
I think the Bengals are going to be plucking an OL and possibly a FB off waivers or trade
Cosby, Caldwell, and Briscoe should stay
Here is my list of the 6 WR’s we should keep.
1. Ochocinco
2. T.O.
3. Shipley
4. Cosby
5. Caldwell
6. Briscoe
In my opinion I just don’t think Simpson has done enough to earn a spot on the Bengals roster. Yes Caldwell didn’t do as much but this is just preseason. Caldwell should stay on this team because he is very valuable and he would be a good slot receiver in the redzone. Then we keep Cosby not only because of his ST abilities but his ability to play the slot receiver. Then Briscoe. We keep Briscoe and develope him into a starting receiver this year and bring him next year to be our #4 receiver.

by 



















