If There Can Only Be One: Johnathan Joseph Should Be Re-signed Over Cedric Benson
As a proud student in the School of Obvious Stuff, after many hours of research using bunsen burners and beakers full of bubbly blue stuff, this writer concludes that the Cincinnati Bengals have several decisions to make during the offseason. And that’s after electing to re-sign Marvin Lewis and reportedly picking up Chad Ochocinco’s option year; as some would argue, old dogs from an old school that produced two playoff games and three losing seasons. Yet, aside from Lewis returning, the big decisions remain.
Of the players with expiring contracts, who will the Bengals re-sign? Will those players even want to return? What position will the team draft? Will they draft based on need (a theory I’m a student of) or will they draft the best player available? They’ve done both, so dictation based on history’s influences provide no hints.
The debate rages with variables transforming into modified questions with answers that are preceded with the most common of conjunctions. Nothing is certain; everything is questioned. This is the life of a Bengals fan observing an offseason after only winning four games during the most recent season. This is the life of a Bengals fan projecting the actions of a man that does the unreasonable, the questionable and the unexpected.
With all of that said, one argument rose recently between this illustrious student of awesome and his comrade in arms, Jason Garrison. After hurling grenades, exhausting .223 remington rounds that fits in our rifle of Who Dey, the two writers decided to battle in a war of words, debating one of the top issues this offseason. Between Johnathan Joseph and Cedric Benson, which player should be signed? Jason picked Cedric Benson. Yours truly, the immaculate one, picked Johnathan Joseph. And here are my reasons.
| PRODUCTION IS VALUE ENOUGH |
One could argue that Adam Jones or Morgan Trent could squeeze in as an eventual replacement if Johnathan Joseph has indeed played his final game of the season. While they are serviceable, they’re also not Johnathan Joseph. A large reason for Cincinnati’s playoff push last season was the combination of a powerful rushing offense (Benson) and great defensive work. Much of that defensive work came from Joseph, who only allowed three touchdowns, was among the league leaders in interceptions (six), passes defended (13) and opposing quarterback rating when thrown to (64.9). Additionally, Joseph’s 62 tackles was only ten tackles away from Nick Harper and Ronde Barber for most tackles by a cornerback in the NFL. You simply cannot pull names out of a hat for a physical cornerback that plays the pass as well as he does.
Even though injury slowed his contribution this season, his production is still very high, only allowing three touchdowns in 2010 and an opposing quarterback rating of 79.2. Additionally with an injury-plagued season, Joseph is one of the least thrown-to cornerbacks in the league (4.25 passes/game) and his 10.4 yards/receiving allowed to opposing receivers is better than Aaron Ross, Devin McCourty, Ronde Barber, Cortland Finnegan, Champ Bailey, Charles Woodson and Darrelle Revis, who is allowing 16.9 yards/receiving to opposing receivers this season.
| SAVE THE DRAFT FOR OTHER POSITIONS OF NEED |
After Nick Fairley’s BCS Championship performance that won the game’s MVP award, it makes you think. If the Bengals let Joseph go, they lose a premiere cornerback and will be forced to draft another cornerback. Even if it made sense that you’d be content with Adam Jones filling the role, keep in mind that next year the contracts of Leon Hall and Jones will expire. That would leave Brandon Ghee and Morgan Trent as your projected starters if the team is unable to sign any of those three cornerbacks.
Realistically, you have to draft a cornerback to replace Joseph if you want to replace his level of production; ideally a talented defensive back in the early rounds of the NFL draft. And there's no assurances even that will happen, with the draft being as predictable as a pregnant woman's mood swings. Scout Inc rates two cornerbacks, LSU’s Patrick Peterson and Nebraska’s Prince Amukamara, as the draft’s top eight players. Sure you could go that route and based on what draft experts say -- the same people that have the job security of local meteorologists -- they are fine players. You could also bank that Jones will give the Bengals a “thanks for giving me a chance so I’ll return” courtesy. And that’s after you put faith in that the neck injury he suffered against Atlanta isn’t something more lasting that will limit his productivity during the 2011 season.
By re-signing Joseph, you temporarily push aside the need about Leon Hall when his contract expires after the 2011 season. And then, you can weigh the option as to whether or not to draft a cornerback in next year's draft. This frees the organization to draft guys like Da’Quan Bowers, Nick Fairley, Marcus Dareus, Robert Quinn or other monsters of the defensive front, whoever will be available. Sign Joseph and find yourself an opposing pass rusher to benefit Carlos Dunlap, or girth in the middle of the defensive line to close the gaps of widening rushing lanes. With Michael Johnson and Geno Atkins already blossoming into their roles, this team could put together a really good defensive front, along with having what many consider as the best cornerback duo in the NFL.
Doesn't that get your blood flowing? Doesn't that make you growl uncontrollably into Terry Tate tackles while in the office shouting Who Dey? No? Well, then you just not alive.
| RUNNING BACKS ARE EASIER TO FIND AND BENSON ISN’T GETTING YOUNGER |
Did you know that between 1997 until 2010, the Bengals have produced a 1,000-yard rusher in 11 of those 14 seasons? Even during one of those seasons (2003), Corey Dillon and Rudi Johnson combined for 1,498 yards rushing. Along with Dillon, Cincinnati featured running backs like Rudi Johnson -- the team's single-season record holder who was drafted in the fourth round -- and the team's current feature back, Cedric Benson, who was signed off the streets because no team was willing to risk their pristine imagine to sign him.
Of the 20 running backs with the most yards rushing in the NFL this season, seven were either undrafted or selected later than the seventh round of the NFL Draft. Arian Foster became only the second undrafted running back to record at least 2,000 yards from scrimmage in NFL history. The other was Priest Holmes, who did it three times. You can find good feature backs anywhere in the draft, and even the hours after.
Additionally, when Benson went down with an injury in 2009, the Bengals rushing game actually improved with two separate running backs that posted 100-yard rushing performances.
| Rusher | Carries | Yards | TDs | Opponent | Result |
| Bernard Scott | 21 | 119 | 0 | Raiders | L, 17-20 |
| Larry Johnson | 22 | 107 | 0 | Browns | W, 16-7 |
| Note: During the two games that Cedric Benson missed in 2009, the Bengals rushing offense put together the best two-game stretch all season, running the ball for 387 yards. | |||||
Cedric Benson has been a great running back for the Bengals when they needed an offensive player to step up and perform, leading the team to a playoffs in 2009. However, among the league’s 48 top rushers who have run the football at least 92 times, Benson’s 3.5 yard/rush average ranks 43rd and his seven fumbles ranked second-most in the league. At this point of the argument, it shouldn't be whether the Bengals choose between both players. It's whether the Bengals should sign Benson at all.
It’s not just his fumbles that’s hurt the Bengals either; it’s when they’ve happened. Benson’s fumble against the Atlanta Falcons occurred when the Bengals were down by a touchdown with 9:46 left in the fourth quarter. The Falcons recovered and scored a touchdown, giving Atlanta a 14-point lead and the eventual win. Benson fumbled with 2:22 left in the first quarter against Indianapolis, who recovered the fumble, scoring a touchdown on the ensuing possession giving them a 17-point lead in a game that the Bengals lost by six points. With a ten-point lead against the Buffalo Bills, Benson fumbled at the Bengals 32-yard line with 10:04 left in the third quarter. The Bills’ Drayton Florence recovered the fumble and returned it for a touchdown reducing Buffalo’s deficit to three points in a game they’d win 49-31. With 7:44 left in the second quarter, Benson fumbled the football on San Diego’s 20-yard line. The Chargers would eventually score a field goal on their ensuring position. That’s five lost fumbles that resulted in three touchdowns, a field goal and a punt. Considering he's been sure-handed in the past, we're willing to give him a break for having an aberration year with his fumbles. But not enough of a break to favor him over Joseph, if given the option.
I would be highly supportive of the Bengals if they signed Benson, as long as it’s not at the result of losing Joseph. However, it’s hard to believe that the Bengals couldn't simply find a running back from the middle rounds of the NFL draft or even an undrafted free agent to be an effective feature back. Question to yourself: Which player is more easily replaceable?
Part two of the third point: Figure that in order to retain Cedric Benson, now that his two-year “thank you for taking a chance on me” contract expires, years will become a critical point during Benson’s negotiations. Recently turned 28 years old on December 28th, if the Bengals want a shot at signing Benson, they might have to look at something in the neighborhood of a 3-4 year deal, depending on the demand from other teams. Either way, by the time Benson’s next deal ends, he could be well into his 30s.
Of the top 20 running backs in 2010, only six are older than 25 years old and the two that are older than 30 years old – Thomas Jones and LaDainian Tomlinson - share time. With Benson reaching the 300-attempts plateau in back-to-back seasons, his body is going to quickly wear down as most bruising running backs watch their bodies break down in the latter half of their 20s. According to an NFL Players Association study in 2002, the length of an average NFL career is only 3.3 years. “The shortest careers were those of running backs (2.57 years).” [1]
| CONCLUSION |
Simply put: In an ideal world, the Cincinnati Bengals are able to retain both players. In a less than ideal world, the Bengals will sign one player and it should be the best one of the two. Johnathan Joseph.
[1] Pro football: Inside the NFL.
New York Times, 24 March 2002, B6
Mike Freeman
24 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Get us a good O-Line, and 1000-yd RBs are a dime a dozen!
I’m pulling the lever for JJ.
by TheWalrus1971 on Jan 13, 2011 1:56 PM EST up reply actions
lock it up
i agree with every single point you made. J-JO over Benson!!!
The Curse of Bo Jackson: Jan 13th,1991- present day
At first glance I thought this was a double post..
Then I realized it wasn’t a double post, it was Jason’s previous post changed for correctness.
Keep J-Jo over Benson 9 times out of 10.. Completely agree.
by 80%OFTHETIMEIMRIGHTEVERYTIME on Jan 13, 2011 10:33 AM EST reply actions
this is a no-brainer.
if forced to choose one or the other, it would be JoJo every time. address RB in the draft.
Brandon Ghee
Why does everyone forget about this guy? I guess it’s easy to because he was on Special Teams and only played half of the year, but he’s last year’s 3rd rounder. He should be in the mix. That’s not to say that I let JJ walk for Ghee—lock up JJ and see what you have in the 3 CBs behnd him and Hall.
I actually think Ghee would be a good FS. He seems to have good instincts and isn’t afraid to lay the wood on a guy. Could be a good spot for him in a crowded secondary…
by Anthony Cosenza on Jan 13, 2011 11:25 AM EST reply actions
Not forgotten....
…but he could be an option at FS.
by wiseking on Jan 13, 2011 1:46 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Also, he's a reason to re-sign JJ
and have confidence in letting Leon go next offseason. Hall’s good, but I’m tired of him getting burned deep. He’s not worth the money it would take to keep him.
Same old Cyanide, new look.
by Pardon_My_French on Jan 14, 2011 10:13 AM EST up reply actions
not so sure...
JJ is injury prone. Benson isn’t. I wouldn’t over pay for either. Even if they lose JJ the draft should focus on DL, Fairley should be the top priority if he’s gone then the DEs. Improve the pass rush. The Steelers and Ravens both have average corners but they are great at rushing the QB. The Bengals should copy that approach.
I don't agree
The monetary value of Benson (undervalued) is way to good to pass up. Plus, we WANTS to play in Cinci. This is why GREAT teams like the Patriots have success. They know when to let go of veterans (like Moss, Seymour, etc.) before they become overvalued. The money we would be paying JJO should go towards either an offensive lineman or Safety.
I honestly think 2010 was a fluke for Benson who still had over 1000 yards rushing. Look at 2008-2009, the guy was rock solid when protecting the ball. Non-existent offensive identity along with bad run calling rhythm = fail. At least in those years, they knew they were a run first team.
"I gotta show em' how to eat right man, that's all...I got all five food groups. Pancakes, sausage-egg McMuffin, cinnamon roll, large orange juice... I just be juiced all day."
Benson
Benson won’t be here if Bob Bratkowski is still on the staff. I’m all for Jonathan Joseph, but i’m afraid we may have to overpay to keep him in Cincy.
JJ stated he wanted to play here too.
Plus if you look at the game where J.J was out and it was just Jones and Hall, they got lit up through the air. I believe that was the Atlanta game and they whooped are ass
"This is why GREAT teams like the Patriots have success. They know when to let go of veterans (like Moss, Seymour, etc.) before they become overvalued."
No. They know how to replace them.
Managing Editor at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Josh Kirkendall on Jan 13, 2011 12:50 PM EST up reply actions
I don't think they replaced Moss
They shifted their offensive scheme to more two-tight end sets and more back field options. Moss didn’t fit in; to their new offensive play calling. The Pats are not throwing the deep ball as they did in 2007.
by sgiridharan1982 on Jan 13, 2011 1:51 PM EST up reply actions
So what your saying is offenses work better when you have players who fit the scheme?
Sincerely,
Bratkowski
+1
Managing Editor at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Josh Kirkendall on Jan 13, 2011 3:23 PM EST up reply actions
RE:
They re-acquired Deion Branch.
Managing Editor at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Josh Kirkendall on Jan 13, 2011 3:25 PM EST up reply actions
Deion Branch doesn't run the deep route as Randy Moss did for NE.
by sgiridharan1982 on Jan 14, 2011 1:00 AM EST up reply actions
So what?
Managing Editor at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Josh Kirkendall on Feb 1, 2011 12:06 PM EST up reply actions
Very True
that was what I implied in my head, it just didn’t end up in my comment above.
"I gotta show em' how to eat right man, that's all...I got all five food groups. Pancakes, sausage-egg McMuffin, cinnamon roll, large orange juice... I just be juiced all day."
They should keep him
But Mike Brown is going to go the cheapest way. In his mind, he will be thinking he has Adam Jones another year, he has leon Hall, why should he spent top dollar to keep JJ? I think he’s gonna let him go.

by 























