Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: L'Equipe Claims He's Coming To Chelsea On Five Year Deal

Draft Talk. Round 2 Poll

Alright so I had the idea to see what the fans want, I know we've talked about who we draft in the first. But who does everyone think we target after that? Where do we look round 2 and after that?

Star-divide

With the first pick I attached the poll, assuming Fairley and Peterson both will most likely not drop to the 4th pick so I went a head and removed them.

Now for the other picks where do we go from there? What positions do you think the Bengals need to target? What players would be the best values for those positions? If a QB like Newton or Mallett fall to 2nd round would the Bengals pull the trigger on one of them? These are just the combination of things I'm curious to see the other fans take on. 

Post up your own Mock drafts and share with us your opinions on the draft.
(trades are fine)
If your not up to date with the draft class right now no worries! Just post what positions we need to target and when you think the Bengals need to rank that in their priorities. 

Hopefully at the end of this we can come to a consensus of what the Bengals need to look at.

Poll
Who do the Bengals go round 2? Bengals[fans voted to] draft A.J. Green round 1. If it's a different player at the same position mark it down in a comment.
DeAndre McDaniel SS Clemson
69 votes
Marcus Cannon OG TCU
122 votes
Mikel Leshoure RB Illinois
62 votes
Marvin Austin DT North Carolina
49 votes
Ryan Mallett QB Arkansas
64 votes
Greg Jones LB Michigan St.
11 votes

377 votes | Poll has closed

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Cincy Jungle's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Cincy Jungle's writers or editors.

Comment 354 comments  |  6 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Defensive line.

Hopefully we can sign Ray Edwards to be our defensive end opposite Dunlap, then take Dareus or Green. I just don’t want Peterson, as he’ll likely be a safety since he’s 220 pounds.

by ddbumpus on Jan 31, 2011 8:35 PM EST reply actions  

I've been liking the Idea of Ray Edwards for a while.

I think if you get rid of odom (and geathers lol) MJ93, Dunlap, Edwards and Rucker could be a solid group of DE’s.

So who do you think we target round 2-7?
Or better said, what positions.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Jan 31, 2011 8:41 PM EST up reply actions  

BPA rounds 2 – 7. My guess is as follows.

Round 2: O Line
Round 3: Safety
Round 4: Running Back/D Line
Round 5: O – Line
Round 6: Kicker
Round 7: Best of WHatever is left.

by ddbumpus on Jan 31, 2011 10:08 PM EST up reply actions  

1st of all

just saying this but edwards has been playing on one of the best d lines in the league so all the concentration has been put on the other guys… who else do we know that had good production due to being on a good d line? cough cough antwan odom

by trussell70 on Feb 3, 2011 10:27 AM EST up reply actions  

that's fair

but he’s not a superstar noone thinks he is and he wont be paid as one.

all hypothetical of course.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 3, 2011 11:11 AM EST up reply actions  

what about

mathias kiwanuka? just another de that will be a free agent that actually plays the right end spot

by trussell70 on Feb 3, 2011 1:45 PM EST up reply actions  

neck/back issues

I dont like to touch those guys

Cincyjungle.com Provisional Contributor for the NFL Draft
Follow me on Twitter for Bengals & NFL draft talk

by Joe Goodberry on Feb 3, 2011 4:25 PM EST up reply actions  

all i knew was

he was tearing it up this past year and he got hurt… i didnt know it was a herniated disc in his neck so i retract my statement im with you goodberry neck and back issues are a stay away sign

by trussell70 on Feb 4, 2011 9:05 AM EST up reply actions  

haha thanks

I hope I didnt sound like a jerk. I was just being informative

Cincyjungle.com Provisional Contributor for the NFL Draft
Follow me on Twitter for Bengals & NFL draft talk

by Joe Goodberry on Feb 7, 2011 8:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Edwards plays LE like Dunlap

who would you like to move?

Twitter - @joeGoodberry
You might remember me as "Firstpick"

by Joe Goodberry on Jan 31, 2011 9:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Edwards to RE.

Dunlap/Edwards > Freeney/Mathis :-)

by ddbumpus on Jan 31, 2011 10:09 PM EST up reply actions  

nope

Twitter - @joeGoodberry
You might remember me as "Firstpick"

by Joe Goodberry on Jan 31, 2011 10:31 PM EST up reply actions  

what else can I say?

Dunlap plays LDE

Twitter - @joeGoodberry
You might remember me as "Firstpick"

by Joe Goodberry on Jan 31, 2011 10:38 PM EST up reply actions  

They're pretty much interchangeable anyways.

The whole “doing your moves backwards” thing is overrated. The fact is that when a RDE switches to LDE, the only huge thing is that his competition is almost always far worse at RT than it would be if it were a LT.

"I bet that sex Bengals fan is really pissed now." -DT3428

by sexsalad on Jan 31, 2011 10:40 PM EST up reply actions  

I understand

But why is it that Dunlap has played LDE his whole life? Even in college. Some guys are better on a particular side. I always was. Some moves worked when I played RDE others worked when I played LDE

Twitter - @joeGoodberry
You might remember me as "Firstpick"

by Joe Goodberry on Jan 31, 2011 10:44 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

no

Allen is the pass rusher. The bigger DE usually plays LDE because the TE is on his side too

Twitter - @joeGoodberry
You might remember me as "Firstpick"

by Joe Goodberry on Jan 31, 2011 10:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Appreciate it.

Still learning some nuances of football, especially defense.

by ddbumpus on Jan 31, 2011 10:52 PM EST up reply actions  

LDE is strong side

I should have said that in the beginning. From the QBs perspective Jared Allen is to his left. But, the Middle LB see Jared Allen on his right. Hence… Right End.

Twitter - @joeGoodberry
You might remember me as "Firstpick"

by Joe Goodberry on Jan 31, 2011 10:55 PM EST up reply actions  

You sure on that one?

I swore a lot of people saying not to get Bowers would mention that he and Dunlap both play RDE, not LDE.

by Doc Scratch on Feb 1, 2011 1:45 AM EST up reply actions  

yes im 999999999% sure

Cincyjungle.com Provisional Contributor for the NFL Draft
Follow me on Twitter for Bengals & NFL draft talk

by Joe Goodberry on Feb 2, 2011 6:52 AM EST up reply actions  

+1

"You don't live in Cleveland, You live in Cincinnati"-Sam Wyche
"I promise to throw interceptions for touchdowns just as good as he did" -Jordan Palmer

by TennBengalfan on Feb 1, 2011 10:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I think they could make the switch.

I don’t think that would prevent us from drafting them and moving them.

by ddbumpus on Feb 1, 2011 11:22 PM EST up reply actions  

bowers

has the versatility to play both end positions… in fact he would move around some in college and play the other side

by trussell70 on Feb 2, 2011 8:08 AM EST up reply actions  

Switching between RDE and LDE isn't as big of a deal as some of you think.

Actually, I bet one of them would love to play LDE and face the weaker right tackles.

Think of it like this; if it were against the 2010 Bengals, it would be the difference between facing Whitworth and Roland.

"I bet that sex Bengals fan is really pissed now." -DT3428

by sexsalad on Jan 31, 2011 10:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Antwan Odom switched

Twitter - @joeGoodberry
You might remember me as "Firstpick"

by Joe Goodberry on Jan 31, 2011 10:39 PM EST up reply actions  

sexsalad

dunlap and edwards both play LDE not RDE so one of them would have to switch and go against the stronger tackle

by trussell70 on Feb 1, 2011 10:10 AM EST up reply actions  

Wait... you don't want Peterson BECAUSE he'll be a safety?

I actually think thats a pretty dang good reason to draft him… lol. Don’t we only have 2 safeties signed for next year?

by The Dealio on Jan 31, 2011 10:01 PM EST up reply actions  

lol

Ndukwe’s a FA
Roy’s a FA.

I know we def. have a bigger need for SS most likely via draft.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Jan 31, 2011 10:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Prolly 1 of them..

I think we re-sign one and draft 1.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Jan 31, 2011 10:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Definitely Ndukwe.

Cannot handle another “I broke my arm/whatever else and be gone for majority of the season”. I really did like Roy though.

by ddbumpus on Jan 31, 2011 10:16 PM EST up reply actions  

That's fair

I think Youth>Age/Injury prone

Is smart.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Jan 31, 2011 10:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I think Roy is still productive when healthy

I’d like to see him back another year or two while we develop a younger guy

by The Dealio on Feb 1, 2011 9:43 AM EST up reply actions  

When healthy is the key word.

by ddbumpus on Feb 1, 2011 11:07 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I think Ndukwe

With a guy like DeAndre McDaniel would be a great set up. You would go into training camp having these 2 fight for the spot.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 1, 2011 8:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Throw Reggie Nelson out there in the other spot.

And keep Chris Crocker around as Veteran guidance. I’d have no complaints and it’s not like Zim has issues rotating his safeties. He did it a lot until our depth got paper thin.

by Doc Scratch on Feb 2, 2011 8:56 PM EST up reply actions  

He did a lot

your 100% right

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 2, 2011 9:23 PM EST up reply actions  

+1

Flying is as simple as throwing yourself at the ground and missing

by bill schwab on Feb 3, 2011 12:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Would love to have a safety like him.

But Zimmer never emphasizes safeties, and D-line is priority #1 for us as our pass rush sucked. I also predict Ghee being a safety next year, battle between him and Nelson for starting FS with possibility of a pick being in the mix for the spot.

You know how zimmer works….have elite corners to mask the safeties, and use them as run stoppers/minimal support.

by ddbumpus on Jan 31, 2011 10:14 PM EST up reply actions  

I would say

Zimmer had Roy Williams in his prime.. There was a little emphasis on SS

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Jan 31, 2011 10:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Touche.

Good call. What did their corner situation look like? I’m certain it wasn’t anywhere near as good as ours.

by ddbumpus on Jan 31, 2011 10:18 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't believe so.

I think Pac-Man was there.

So maybe a little bit like ours. haha

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Jan 31, 2011 10:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Wasn't he signed then cut nearly immediately?

For being out of shape and overall suckage? Oh and the fact he shoots people in strip clubs.

by ddbumpus on Jan 31, 2011 10:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Makes it Rain in strip clubs. Get your facts straight!

Greatest quote in georgetown in 2010.

“I’ma make it rain” – Adam “Pac Man” Jones

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Jan 31, 2011 10:28 PM EST up reply actions  

that would be exactly

why i WOULD want peterson…you know safety, a big need

by joeb69 on Jan 31, 2011 10:59 PM EST up reply actions  

you don't want peterson?

that would be exactly why i WOULD want peterson…you know safety, a big need

by joeb69 on Jan 31, 2011 11:01 PM EST up reply actions  

We have a lot of needs haha

Safety is one I hope they address in the 2nd or 3rd. For the first pick I hope they take Bowers, Fairley, or if they are gone and Green is there, him. Especially if Chad gets traded/released. I don’t really know where to begin after that. We need everything 70sav said except maybe RB/WR depending on what happens with the FA, and even then it wouldn’t be a bad idea to draft one.

by aguy on Jan 31, 2011 9:14 PM EST reply actions  

some players I'm interested in

I like ILB Martez Wilson and OLBs Justin Houston, Von Miller, and Mason Foster. I’m not sold on Greg Jones. Martez would be available in the 2nd but I don’t think we need that position at all- and certainly not that high. Houston and Miller are gone unless we trade down- and I’ve seen some mocks with Miller going as high as #3. Foster may be available later but isn’t an urgent need for us.

We really need a disruptor on the interior of the d-line. Obviously, Fairley would be the best bet but I think Marvin Austin might do in a pinch. Probably have to grab him in the second and probably wouldn’t if we’d grabbed Bowers in the first. Phil Taylor is a prototypical nose guard- a Vince Wilfork or Shawn Rogers wide load, that I’m not sure would fit in our 4-3. You know how I love the big fellas but it just doesn’t seem a fit. Stephen Paea is another interior lineman but I’m not all that impressed with him. What about Jarvis Jenkins out of Clemson?

There’s quite a few good guards out there. Clint Bolling from Georgia, John Moffitt from Wisconsin, and Danny Watkins from Baylor all play with a nasty streak which I like a great deal. I like Marcus Cannon’s size but, to be truthful, I haven’t seen much tape of him and don’t have a real good feel for how he plays the position.

Safety is a huge need. My favorite is DeAndre McDaniel. Yeah, he’s got an attitude, he’s cocky, but he makes plays and I think Zim could channel that aggression into an Ed Reed type player. I think Rahim Moore out of UCLA is better than he’s rated, primarily because of playing on an otherwise horrid Bruins defense. I’m not sold on Tyler Sash- I think he’s another Tom Nelson. Ahmad Black is a bit undersized but always seems to be at the heart of the action. Robert Sands is huge and a big hitter but he may be a bit slow to play at this level- that’ll probably depend on the combine. Will Hill is intriguing in the later rounds.

I think, regardless of whether Carson is back or not, we don’t grab a quarterback in the first two rounds and, after that, only Kaepernick actually has the potential to one day run the offense.

So, if we’re gonna assume Carson’s back and no significant extra picks from moving Chad, I’d like something like this:

1: Bowers
2. DeAndre McDaniels
3. Colin Kaepernick
4. John Moffitt or Clint Bolling
5. Greg Little or Terrance Tolliver
6. Justin Boren
7. Alex Henery or Kai Forbath.

by IgnatiusJReilly on Jan 31, 2011 9:52 PM EST reply actions  

Where's Taiwan Jones? :)

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Jan 31, 2011 9:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Damn it! I new I'd forget something

Okay, we get a pick for Chad and it’s either Taiwan or Derrick Locke- who is so fast Chris Johnson looks like he’s going backwards and can run between the tackles, too.

by IgnatiusJReilly on Jan 31, 2011 10:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Wishlist:

Round 1, DT – Nick Fairley, Marcell Dareus, Marvin Austin, Stephen Paea
Round 2, OT/G – Joseph Barksdale, Rodney Hudson, Gabe Carimi
Round 3, WR – Randall Cobb, Tandon Doss, Greg Little
Round 4, SS – Tyler Sash, Jeron Johnson, Shiloh Keo
Round 5, ILB – Casey Matthews, Alex Wujciak, Josh Bynes
Round 6, DE – Ryan Winterswyk, Pierre Allen, Greg Romeus
Round 7, RB – Taiwan Jones, Noel Devine, Evan Royster, John Clay

I’d like to take a DE and OT in free agency with the cap space losing Carson will free up.

by Cry on Jan 31, 2011 9:53 PM EST reply actions  

2 – Carimi will go top 15-20 for sure
4 – I think we will be able to find better safeties in round 4

Twitter - @joeGoodberry
You might remember me as "Firstpick"

by Joe Goodberry on Jan 31, 2011 10:03 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm with you on Carimi

That would be surreal if he fell to us in the second. Otherwise I think there are some good guards out there such as

Stefen Wisniewski | 6’3, 302 pounds | C | Penn State
Marcus Cannon | 6’5, 350 pounds | OT | TCU
Ben Ijalana | 6’4, 320 pounds | OT/G | Villanova

by The Dealio on Jan 31, 2011 10:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Crap

I forgot Ijalana. I’m also thinking the criticized for being light, Rodney Hudson, could definitely pack on 20-30 pounds and, with his excellent technique and athleticism, be a good guard here.

by IgnatiusJReilly on Jan 31, 2011 10:18 PM EST up reply actions  

It's hard to pack on 20-30 lbs on a frame

and maintain your athleticism.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 1, 2011 4:07 AM EST up reply actions  

especially his frame

and not to mention if he were to add that weight his athleticism will drop and technique can get a little worse by not being able to move as well

by trussell70 on Feb 1, 2011 10:13 AM EST up reply actions  

+1

Moisture is the essense of wetness, and wetness is the essense of beauty.

by Blue Steel on Jan 31, 2011 10:19 PM EST up reply actions  

what about the prospect of Andre Smith to RG though?

have Cannon at LG next to Whitworth and keep Collins at LT?

Moisture is the essense of wetness, and wetness is the essense of beauty.

by Blue Steel on Jan 31, 2011 10:20 PM EST up reply actions  

*Collins at RT I meant

Moisture is the essense of wetness, and wetness is the essense of beauty.

by Blue Steel on Jan 31, 2011 10:20 PM EST up reply actions  

RT*

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Jan 31, 2011 10:20 PM EST up reply actions  

That would work, too

Get Livings and Mathis out of the equation altogether.

by IgnatiusJReilly on Jan 31, 2011 10:21 PM EST up reply actions  

THANK YOU

Moisture is the essense of wetness, and wetness is the essense of beauty.

by Blue Steel on Jan 31, 2011 10:23 PM EST up reply actions  

One of them would have to stay on as a backup.

"I bet that sex Bengals fan is really pissed now." -DT3428

by sexsalad on Jan 31, 2011 10:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Mathis.

Though we have hudson.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Jan 31, 2011 10:29 PM EST up reply actions  

I want that guy back from Hard Knocks

who looked like Randy Jackson. Augustus something or other. And what about converted guard Jason Shirley? Is he still in the mix?

by IgnatiusJReilly on Jan 31, 2011 10:33 PM EST up reply actions  

This would be my ideal draft at this point

Rnd 1 (4) – A.J. Green WR UGa
Rnd 2 (55) – (I would trade back here, aquire another 4th round pick) Ahmad Black S FL
Rnd 3 (67) – John Moffitt G/C Wisconsin
Rnd 4 (100, 115 &120 (trade Chad)) – Delone Carter RB Syracuse, Owen Marecic FB Stanford, Mason Foster OLB Washington
Rnd 5 (133) – Ricky Stanzi QB Iowa
Rnd 6 (166) – Markus White, DE, Fl St
Rnd 7 (199) – Josh Thomas CB – Buffalo

Twitter - @joeGoodberry
You might remember me as "Firstpick"

by Joe Goodberry on Jan 31, 2011 10:00 PM EST reply actions  

Love Marecic

even if he didn’t displace Pressley, he would be a dynamite special teamer and even a back-up LB

by IgnatiusJReilly on Jan 31, 2011 10:22 PM EST up reply actions  

why does everyone love ahmad black so much

i would take duenta williams from unc over that guy

by trussell70 on Feb 1, 2011 10:15 AM EST up reply actions  

if ahmad black was 6'0" 205lbs

 Would go in the top 20 picks. He’s that good!
Sure he’s small, but so are Bob Sanders, Earl Thomas, and Donte Whitner. All are at least starting safeties in the NFL. Black is mostly similar to E.Thomas without as much speed.

Twitter - @joeGoodberry
You might remember me as "Firstpick"

by Joe Goodberry on Feb 1, 2011 12:19 PM EST up reply actions  

i actually just watched some more clips of black

and my mind has been swayed i actually am starting to like this kid a lot more but im still saying duenta williams would also be a great addition… my 3 safeties i really like now are mcdaniels, williams, and black… rahim moore for how high he will be drafted isnt worth it i think those 3 have just as much potential (goodberry thank you for making me take a 2nd look at black)

by trussell70 on Feb 1, 2011 1:58 PM EST up reply actions  

no problem, its what I do

The Think woth D. Williams is he just got hurt. He wont be able to work out, and will he be ready for the 2011 season? I bet that drops him to the 5th or 6th round. No joke.

Cincyjungle.com Provisional Contributor for the NFL Draft
Follow me on Twitter for Bengals & NFL draft talk

by Joe Goodberry on Feb 1, 2011 3:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Black is just a flat-out baller

his combine stats may not rate a second look but he has that instinct that you can’t teach. Plus, he’s a little bigger than Bob Sanders.

by IgnatiusJReilly on Feb 1, 2011 5:58 PM EST up reply actions  

OMG, there's actually football talk on this post....

okay, here’s my question. Since it’s apparent we may not get Fairley, what other DT prospects are out there? And are there any who will be better than Peko/Sims/Atkins?

Moisture is the essense of wetness, and wetness is the essense of beauty.

by Blue Steel on Jan 31, 2011 10:14 PM EST reply actions  

nevermind, I see this question was arleady brought up above

disregard

Moisture is the essense of wetness, and wetness is the essense of beauty.

by Blue Steel on Jan 31, 2011 10:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I love Marvin Austin.

Unfortunately, he’s not worth a really high 2nd like ours and he probably won’t fall to the 3rd.

"I bet that sex Bengals fan is really pissed now." -DT3428

by sexsalad on Jan 31, 2011 10:16 PM EST up reply actions  

but maybe a potential lower 2nd round pick we get for Palmer or Chad???

Moisture is the essense of wetness, and wetness is the essense of beauty.

by Blue Steel on Jan 31, 2011 10:16 PM EST up reply actions  

if he wouldnt have been suspended

he would be a 1st rounder so why couldnt we grab him with our 2nd rd pick… yes its a little reach but the dude is good and his ceiling is extremely high

by trussell70 on Feb 1, 2011 12:03 PM EST up reply actions  

His ceiling may be high..

But so is what he could fail at.

Not playing for a season and didn’t wow me during the shrine game. (which is all 3rd, 4th 5th round guys) Which is a game I think was vital to his draft stock.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 1, 2011 12:42 PM EST up reply actions  

for his 1st time playing in a year

he actually did quite well… he may not have wowed you but his play wasnt bad and will only continue to get better

by trussell70 on Feb 1, 2011 1:50 PM EST up reply actions  

like i said though

he played against mid and late round talent.

a 2nd rounder should stand out a lil more.. he’s a 3rd in my book

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 1, 2011 2:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I rate him number 48 on my Big Board

Cincyjungle.com Provisional Contributor for the NFL Draft
Follow me on Twitter for Bengals & NFL draft talk

by Joe Goodberry on Feb 1, 2011 3:51 PM EST up reply actions  

I haven't done a big board lately..

I would prolly give him late 2nd early 3rd..

I was more saying it’s what I would spend on him with our picks

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 1, 2011 5:20 PM EST up reply actions  

i have one updated every sunday for another website

Cincyjungle.com Provisional Contributor for the NFL Draft
Follow me on Twitter for Bengals & NFL draft talk

by Joe Goodberry on Feb 2, 2011 6:54 AM EST up reply actions  

you answered your own?

If you don’t get Fairley, you wont find an upgrade over who we already have

Twitter - @joeGoodberry
You might remember me as "Firstpick"

by Joe Goodberry on Jan 31, 2011 10:34 PM EST up reply actions  

My ideal draft

1. Bowers.
2. Marcus Cannon or Stephen Wisniewski
3. Marvin Austin
4. Greg Little
5. Josh Bynes
6. A RB. No particular preference here.
7. Greg McElroy. I didn’t think he’d fall this far until he broke his throwing hand. Now that he’ll be rusty at the combine, he could easily fall to this spot.

"I bet that sex Bengals fan is really pissed now." -DT3428

by sexsalad on Jan 31, 2011 10:15 PM EST reply actions  

Greg Little isnt a sleeper

Teams are very high on him. I could see him going round 2 through 4 at the latest

Twitter - @joeGoodberry
You might remember me as "Firstpick"

by Joe Goodberry on Jan 31, 2011 10:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I never said he was.

I had him going at the beginning of the fourth, which you just acknowledged as a possibility.

"I bet that sex Bengals fan is really pissed now." -DT3428

by sexsalad on Jan 31, 2011 10:43 PM EST up reply actions  

you never know though

people said the same about gilyard last year and he lasted until the 4th… point is, there’s lots of guys in the draft and you never know who’ll slip

by The Dealio on Feb 1, 2011 9:50 AM EST up reply actions  

haha no, you guys loved Gilyard

I don’t live in Ohio. I saw him as he was.

Twitter - @joeGoodberry
You might remember me as "Firstpick"

by Joe Goodberry on Feb 1, 2011 12:21 PM EST up reply actions  

It's really hard to do this right now.....

with so many unknowns. Who do we target in FA? Is Carson gonna stick around, get traded, retire, or get released? What about Chad? What about JJ? What about Benson?

Depending how those situations play out, you have to draft accordingly. You also have to draft, offensively, accordingly to who your OC is. We currently do not have an OC.

I’m somewhat encouraged that we won’t go defense over Green by reports that blame the offense for the defensive problems. I don’t agree with that, but still would like Green in the 1st. Take Green, and as long as Carson is sticking around, draft oline and defense the rest of the way.

by Stanley1 on Jan 31, 2011 10:16 PM EST reply actions  

I think the

offense needs to take some of the blame for defensive problems. mind you not all. but consider the fact that turn overs gave the other team prime field position and we rarely won the battle for time of possession.

When you turn the ball over and don’t control time of possession it’s hard to win.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Jan 31, 2011 10:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Injuries killed the defense too

We were hurting pretty much everywhere on defense at some point during the season. When guys signed a few days before a game are playing, it can end badly

by aguy on Jan 31, 2011 10:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Yep.

Who the F were half those people in the secondary? I think I saw a couple of my neighbors playing.

by ddbumpus on Jan 31, 2011 10:26 PM EST up reply actions  

That's actually another fair thing to say to.

But that too would make you think with those players coming back you may not need the emphasis on D as much?

I mean we really went through a freak thing losing so many players.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Jan 31, 2011 10:26 PM EST up reply actions  

I think we draft at least one safety

a d-line guy (preferably end if not Fairley) and an inside LB. Maybe throw a CB or another safety in a late round. I want at least one O-Lineman, maybe 2, and maybe a WR/RB?

by aguy on Jan 31, 2011 10:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Why are experts so high on Blaine Gabbert?

I haven’t seen him, but every year there is a QB that comes out of nowhere and becomes the hot thing – see: Joe Flacco.

by ddbumpus on Jan 31, 2011 10:25 PM EST reply actions  

Gabbert

is a physical prototype, Roethlisberger-bodied, fairly strong-armed QB. His problem will be his release, taking snaps under center, and figuring out a non-gimmick offense. Why they’re so high on him, I have no idea.

by IgnatiusJReilly on Jan 31, 2011 10:32 PM EST up reply actions  

lol

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Jan 31, 2011 10:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Nah, cause he's not a runner at all

Pretty much a pure passer. Think Graham Harrell from Texas Tech a couple years back.

by IgnatiusJReilly on Jan 31, 2011 10:34 PM EST up reply actions  

This.

You always hear that he’s “mobile,” and he is, but he’s not a runner.

"I bet that sex Bengals fan is really pissed now." -DT3428

by sexsalad on Jan 31, 2011 10:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Ahh Gotcha.

Loved that Texas Tech/Texas game. That Michael Crabtree grab to win the game was AWESOME.

by ddbumpus on Jan 31, 2011 10:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh and Mike Leach will be 2011 OC.

Called it here! We have to get the biggest idiot possible to be our next OC. Maybe locking Ocho in the shed will straighten him out.

by ddbumpus on Jan 31, 2011 10:36 PM EST up reply actions  

That's more the vibe I get.

Maybe with more of an upside.

But I’m not a Gabbert fan.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Jan 31, 2011 10:35 PM EST up reply actions  

out of nowhere?

Gabbert was one of the best QBs in the NCAA the last couple years. I have unmeasurable hatred for the state of Missouri for numerous reasons, but I can’t deny this kid can play. Whether he can do well at the NFL level.. I don’t know. He took over for Chase Daniel, who was phenomenal, and the Tiger offense really didn’t miss a beat. Unlike Daniel (who looked very good in preseason, btw) Gabbert is tall enough to be considered for a starting job in the NFL.

The knock on him: He played in a spread offense in college, specifically in the Big 12. Is he the next franchise QB or the next David Klingler?

by indesignkat on Feb 3, 2011 9:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Next version, what, 2.0

1. Robert Quinn- to bulk up and play opposite Dunlap in tandem with MJ93. Dude is like butter rushing the passer.
2. Marcus Cannon- because he’s a giant
3. DeAndre McDaniels
4. Greg Little
5. Kendrick Burney
6. Taiwan Jones
7. Kai Forbath

by IgnatiusJReilly on Jan 31, 2011 10:26 PM EST reply actions  

Ooh, I forgot about Deandre McDaniel.

"I bet that sex Bengals fan is really pissed now." -DT3428

by sexsalad on Jan 31, 2011 10:27 PM EST up reply actions  

I see him taken right before our 3rd.

I would love him to be there.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Jan 31, 2011 10:29 PM EST up reply actions  

If we got him AND Fairley

we’d have the makings of a mean as $hit defense.

by IgnatiusJReilly on Jan 31, 2011 10:29 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I've seen him mocked to us in a couple of drafts

Some have Bowers going to Carolina, and if that happens all bets are off. I think Denver is going to grab Peterson, and Buffalo just might be obsessed enough with their skill players to draft Green. (I can hope right?)

This is our year!

by Paul Cannon on Jan 31, 2011 11:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Or a desperately needed QB

as, apparently, Ralph Wilson has already made his desire public. I could see Blaine Gabbert going to Buffalo, not that I’d wish him on anyone- except maybe Cleveland. I’ve also seen, since he proved he wasn’t a one-trick pony at the Senior Bowl, Von Miller being mocked to Buffalo. Who knows. I think it’s way too high for a 237lb. DE who’ll have to learn to be an NFL linebacker.

by IgnatiusJReilly on Feb 1, 2011 1:34 AM EST up reply actions  

Given that Fairley's a 4-3 DT, if he makes it past Carolina, he drops to us.

And they always have options of A.J. Green and Da’Quan Bowers. Fairley’s a great player but even Suh didn’t go #1 overall. I don’t think the Rams or the Lions mind.

by Doc Scratch on Feb 1, 2011 1:52 AM EST up reply actions  

On Denver's defense..

http://espn.go.com/blog/nflnation/post/_/id/36470/broncos-likely-to-switch-to-4-3

Their new DC said this"

“I don’t look at it as a huge issue,” Allen said. “Each player has a unique skill set and the challenge for a coach is to find out what those guys do well. So we’re going to give them opportunities to do the things that they do well, whether it’s 4-3, 3-4, 4-4, it doesn’t really matter. I think our challenge is finding out what our personnel can do and highlighting those strengths.”

Allen and Fox both come from 4-3’s and the idea of them getting a piece like Fairley or Bowers to help the change may really intrigue them.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 1, 2011 2:32 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeh, that's what I was thinking.

Still the possibility they take Peterson regardless but given that they have to retool their entire defense (as the secondary outside of Bailey was terrible as well), any pick will help.

by Doc Scratch on Feb 1, 2011 2:59 AM EST up reply actions  

For me the biggest question is if Car takes a WR or

if Buffalo takes a WR or QB. Anywho, there are drafts that say either of those scenarios are likely… Also, Marcel Dareus might slip into the top 4 as well

by The Dealio on Feb 1, 2011 9:58 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm just going to throw it out there that if we trade back a little bit I wouldn't be too opposed to Cam Newton.

I don’t want him really high, but it would be cool in the 10-15 range.

"I bet that sex Bengals fan is really pissed now." -DT3428

by sexsalad on Jan 31, 2011 10:38 PM EST reply actions  

-1

Please, no Akili Smith part 2. You know we’ll draft him though.

by ddbumpus on Jan 31, 2011 10:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Exactly why I don't want him at 4.

I still see him as a guy whose ceiling is Roethlisberger, which is a VERY good thing. His floor is what scares me. I still say it would be a weaker-armed Jamarcus Russell, but most don’t agree with me.

"I bet that sex Bengals fan is really pissed now." -DT3428

by sexsalad on Jan 31, 2011 10:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Kid's motivated and driven to win

Jamarcus never seemed to have that- nor the flat out speed, the accuracy, and the running skills. Not really worried about Cam getting fat.

by IgnatiusJReilly on Jan 31, 2011 10:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Cam could eat Akili

and still go out and run a 4.5 40. Totally different animal. I’m not saying we should draft him but he has the potential to be a more accurate, better running Donovan McNabb.

by IgnatiusJReilly on Jan 31, 2011 10:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Again, I wouldn't want him at our pick.

I’m just kicking around the (most likely unrealistic) possibility that we trade back to the mid first and he’s still there. If he was sitting there in the mid 1st, we have a pick and this Carson situation hasn’t been sorted out or he’s been traded, well…

"I bet that sex Bengals fan is really pissed now." -DT3428

by sexsalad on Jan 31, 2011 10:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Rather have him that Gabbert.

That’s for sure! Or Ryan “cocaine is a helluva drug” Mallett in the first round.

by ddbumpus on Jan 31, 2011 10:46 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree wholeheartedly that we don't want him at four

and I think he might require a gifted QB coach to really prosper, which doesn’t seem to be the case here anyway.

by IgnatiusJReilly on Jan 31, 2011 10:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Fairley is still an option for us

Some teams are really scared about his personality and wreckless play

Twitter - @joeGoodberry
You might remember me as "Firstpick"

by Joe Goodberry on Jan 31, 2011 10:42 PM EST reply actions  

And we all know

The Bengals don’t give a damn about personality hahaha

by aguy on Jan 31, 2011 10:44 PM EST up reply actions  

So what you're saying....

is that we’ll be so attracted to him we’ll have to draft him as our reclamation project.

by ddbumpus on Jan 31, 2011 10:44 PM EST up reply actions  

12.5% chance he's a Bengal? lol

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Jan 31, 2011 10:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Fairley-Bengals need to see him

run the 40 without a shirt before they consider drafting him.

"When you chart (the plays) and see where it broke down there was no common theme to it." - Bob Bratkowski

by featherman on Feb 1, 2011 1:48 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't mind

as long as he doesn’t go jumping off a pickup. RIP slim.

by aguy on Jan 31, 2011 10:46 PM EST reply actions  

So taking a few notes of your guys's mocks etc

Emphasis on Early round safety. (2-3)
Mid round interrior OL, (3rd-4th)
Mid round LB (4-5)
-
We need another DE,
We need another WR
--
Now question I’d like people to elaborate on. The QB situation.
If Cam Newton or Mallett fall to 2nd do we consider it at least?
And if not, is it important to at least look into it a qb sometime earlier, since Carson seems to have no interest in being here?

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Jan 31, 2011 10:47 PM EST reply actions  

Go after Kyle Orton or Kevin Kolb

Draft a QB when there’s a real franchise QB to be had.

by Cry on Jan 31, 2011 10:50 PM EST up reply actions  

1% chance Newton makes it to round 2

If Mallett is there, its a perfect opportunity to find a trading partner

Twitter - @joeGoodberry
You might remember me as "Firstpick"

by Joe Goodberry on Jan 31, 2011 10:50 PM EST up reply actions  

If Mallett is there, its a perfect opportunity to find a trading partner

That makes too much sense. lol

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Jan 31, 2011 10:52 PM EST up reply actions  

That's hard

I suppose, since he’s 31, whether he’s gonna be here or not, we need a replacement if not now then eventually. I’d like to give it a pass this year and take a shot at Landry Jones next year but can LeFevour- or some stopgap vet get us through if Carson is gone. I like Kaepernick because I think he would benefit from Carson’s tutelage but, at the same time, he could be thrown out there to fend for himself with his athleticism if we had to. Same goes for Newton if he slips out of round one- which I doubt, or we pick up a later round one for Carson and/or Chad.

by IgnatiusJReilly on Jan 31, 2011 10:51 PM EST up reply actions  

+1

Its time to upgrade the trenches. DL round 1, OL Round2, Safety Round 3

by The Dealio on Feb 1, 2011 10:01 AM EST up reply actions  

you cant plan a draft imo

Take best player available every pick, and you will be successful

Twitter - @joeGoodberry
You might remember me as "Firstpick"

by Joe Goodberry on Feb 1, 2011 12:22 PM EST up reply actions  

What happens when it's a player where you already have depth?

And what happens if at the end of a day you never address a certain need?

by Cry on Feb 1, 2011 4:14 PM EST up reply actions  

fill holes via free agency

Whats our biggest need this offseason? OL and DL depth? And QB?

What was our biggest need in 09?
Offensive weapons

What was or biggest need in 08?
Offensive line

My point is, your needs change. We went into the 09 season with Chad Coles Henry Caldwell Simpson
we came out with Chad

Cincyjungle.com Provisional Contributor for the NFL Draft
Follow me on Twitter for Bengals & NFL draft talk

by Joe Goodberry on Feb 1, 2011 11:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Personally, I’m going to disagree about another linebacker. I really don’t think we’ll take one. My guess is that Jones will be resigned, and we’ll have Maulaluga, Jones, Rivers, Skuta, rey, Muckelroy and possibly Brandon Johnson. For all we know it could be Michael Johnson as a LB.

As for WR, we have Chad, Simpson, Caldwell, Shipley. Cosby will be gone. Could see that early (green?) but I think 2nd round here if a first round talent falls.

by ddbumpus on Jan 31, 2011 10:51 PM EST reply actions  

I guess I think Chad's gone

Usually when a player brews up so much trouble against his own coach it’s a one way ticket out of there.
Even more when he he actually blatantly says he wants to fight him.

I don’t think Dhani will be resigned part of me thinks he wants to move on and enjoy his celebrity and tv show (which unlike chad he has a good show). And Brandon may want to venture off into free agency to test the waters (do you blame him)

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Jan 31, 2011 10:58 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm not sure Maulaluga will be moved to MLB.

If he does, I’d like to see Michael Johnson take his spot.

by ddbumpus on Jan 31, 2011 11:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't think he will honestly.

I don’t think he’s got the football IQ to be the QB of the Defense.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Jan 31, 2011 11:01 PM EST up reply actions  

So we need a MLB. Do you have anybody in mind?

I don’t think Zimmer would make Muckelroy his starter.

by ddbumpus on Jan 31, 2011 11:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Muck is a very very intellectual player

Twitter - @joeGoodberry
You might remember me as "Firstpick"

by Joe Goodberry on Jan 31, 2011 11:04 PM EST up reply actions  

If he can do it, that'd be great.

One less need for a team that needs a lot.

by ddbumpus on Jan 31, 2011 11:05 PM EST up reply actions  

He may be able to.

Vinny Rey I heard is another high football IQ player.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Jan 31, 2011 11:06 PM EST up reply actions  

You're incorrect because this is the bengals, not a normal organization.

Usually when a player brews up so much trouble against his own coach it’s a one way ticket out of there.
Even more when he he actually blatantly says he wants to fight him.

by ddbumpus on Jan 31, 2011 11:00 PM EST reply actions  

I think Marvin will do everything he can

to get him out of here.

And if Brat can finally get fired..
Anything can happen ;)

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Jan 31, 2011 11:02 PM EST up reply actions  

another factor that have to be taken into account is the cba

If a new cba is not reached before the draft. Then teams will just assume that all of their free agents are gone and out of their plans. So when draft day comes around teams are gonna fill their holes.

So we have to assume free agents will be low priority.

Twitter - @joeGoodberry
You might remember me as "Firstpick"

by Joe Goodberry on Jan 31, 2011 11:03 PM EST reply actions  

Hm.

I dunno enough about the back-of-the-pack guys to say I want this player or that player, but I’m not sure about our LB situation as you guys seem to be. If Dhani is let go and Brandon Johnson goes elsewhere for starter money, you need to take at least one guy, either draft or FA. I don’t have faith in the Michael Johnson experiment and I feel like we’d stunt his development moving him to OLB after he started coming on towards the end of the year as a pass-rushing DE.

So, I want Fairley. It’s possible we can get him as Denver seems to be taking Peterson and if they don’t take him and take Fairley, they’re dumb as hell (though with Fox coming in, that defense could shift back to a 4-3 and then they’d need all the personnel they can get for a 4-3, but that’s also dumb as hell as they’d ruin a decent 3-4 LB corps). That’s basically it. If we don’t get him, I could care less about who we pick because it won’t be a need but just kind of a frugality. Sure, you draft Bowers. What does he do on third-down scenarios when we bring Johnson in? Sure, you draft A.J. Green. Whose playing time do you take and do you shove SImpson back down the depth chart again? Sure, you draft Patrick Peterson, do you risk tweaking him or do you just tell Hall or Jones or Joseph that they mean next to nothing?

And then there’s the QB but let’s get Palmer’s situation sorted out before we say anything on drafting one of those guys. If he still wants to leave, let him leave, or draft his replacement. If he feels like staying, wait until next year. Landry Jones and Andrew Luck make a decent class and not every team is going to be as needy as we are this year.

Second round should be a guard or a tackle converted to guard. Basically interior linemen again. If no good picks (which shouldn’t be possible, there are a ton of tackles that can convert as well as a ton of actual guards themselves) present themselves, go safety, then go guard in the third (otherwise guard, then safety).

Fourth through sixth round should be BPA, and seventh round should at least look into kickers.

by Doc Scratch on Feb 1, 2011 2:07 AM EST reply actions  

I rec'd this article by the way.

Everybody else should too.

This is our year!

by Paul Cannon on Feb 1, 2011 9:09 AM EST reply actions  

Here's my ideal draft

I’d love to get either Peterson or Fairley, but I’m sort of assuming those guys are gone. So with that said here’s what I would like to see:

  1. - Marcell Dareus – I’d be hesitant to take Bowers or Quinn since I think that they would stunt the growth of MJ. If we could get a dominant guy in the middle next to Atkins, I’d be pretty happy with our DLine.
  1. - Marcus Cannon or an equivalent OG – One of the biggest Olinemen in the draft, and would fit great in our power running scheme.
  1. - Safety (If McDaniel’s still there he might be a good option), – I don’t think we should wait much longer than this to draft a DB. Obviously if we draft Peterson then this wouldn’t be needed, but I think it’s more likely that Fairley drops to us than Peterson.
  1. - RB – The more that I consider resigning Benson the more I’m against it. Yes, we could wait until the last rounds to find a RB, but I’d like to see if we could pick up a guy like Kendall Hunter or Demarco Murray.
  1. - 7 in no particular order: LB, QB, FB, WR. At this point I think they should be drafting for value only. There’s no sense in trying to fill holes with late round picks

This is our year!

by Paul Cannon on Feb 1, 2011 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't know how that all got confused....

the last one is supposed to say “rounds 5-7”

This is our year!

by Paul Cannon on Feb 1, 2011 3:25 PM EST up reply actions  

few notes

1) I really dont love Dareus. He’s number 9 on my Big Board. He takes plays off. Not in really good shape. Played 3-4 end most of his college career. He’s not an ideal fit for us.

2) I’m 50/50 on Cannon. Yes hes huge, but at 6’8", he’s maybe too tall to play guard. Of course he plays with bad leverage, bends at the waist instead of the knees, lets smaller D-linemen get inside of him and move him around. Theres a chance Pouncey is there in round 2. My top Interior O-Linemen are…
1) M.Pouncey FL
2) S.Wisneiwski Penn st
3) J.Moffitt Wisc
4) M.Cannon TCU
5) R. Hudson FLst
6) D.Watkins Baylor

Cincyjungle.com Provisional Contributor for the NFL Draft
Follow me on Twitter for Bengals & NFL draft talk

by Joe Goodberry on Feb 1, 2011 3:58 PM EST up reply actions  

if pouncy is their in round 2

Regardles of who we pick in the 1st ill be happy with our draft.

by JCompton41 on Feb 1, 2011 5:12 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I'm not sure on Pouncey

he just seems to small, especially for the AFCN with the likes of Hampton, Ngata, and Rogers. Sure, his brother is excelling at center, but even at times, I’ve seen him get blown off the ball.

I’d much rather see a mamouth, beefed up guard, like a Cannon – or Andre Smith converted over. Or… both of them on either side of Cook with Whitworth and Collins on the outsides….

Moisture is the essense of wetness, and wetness is the essense of beauty.

by Blue Steel on Feb 1, 2011 5:23 PM EST up reply actions  

he's also 6-6.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 1, 2011 10:17 PM EST up reply actions  

also if it's so easy..

why hasn’t he added to his frame?

he’s seemed to work at keeping to that playing weight.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 1, 2011 10:20 PM EST up reply actions  

even Steinbach has been overmatched at times

due to his lack of size. He’s a great pulling guard, but at the point of attack against the run, he gets beat up a lot.

Moisture is the essense of wetness, and wetness is the essense of beauty.

by Blue Steel on Feb 1, 2011 10:41 PM EST up reply actions  

questions..

1. Where did you get 6’8" CBS, andTCU’s own website list him at either 6’5 or 6’6.

2. Not big on Ijalana?
Or just don’t view him as a Tackle?

3. Speaking of tackle to guards
What about Demarcus Love and Lee Ziemba ?

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 1, 2011 5:49 PM EST up reply actions  

typo for cannon

Ijalana was on my OT list that’s why I didn’t think of him. He would be my #2 G

Cincyjungle.com Provisional Contributor for the NFL Draft
Follow me on Twitter for Bengals & NFL draft talk

by Joe Goodberry on Feb 1, 2011 11:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Understandable

I know some may not be big on Cannon, I’ve heard some concern with him being too large already.

And yea I think Ijalana is fair to be put at #2 Guard.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 1, 2011 11:52 PM EST up reply actions  

was talking with a friend about Nate Solder

I think that’s why I had 6’8" on my brain

Cincyjungle.com Provisional Contributor for the NFL Draft
Follow me on Twitter for Bengals & NFL draft talk

by Joe Goodberry on Feb 2, 2011 6:59 AM EST up reply actions  

Quick reply

1. I’m pretty sure that they said that Carlos Dunlap took plays off too, but if Dareus is not ‘in good shape’ then that is a red flag. We’ll find out more after the combine.
2. I’d be ok with any of those offensive lineman. I don’t claim to be an expert on any of those guys, but I’ve only heard good things about Cannon, and I’d be stoked to have him. If he can handle the NTs, DEs and LBs in the AFC North is my only qualification – throw height out the window.

This is our year!

by Paul Cannon on Feb 1, 2011 9:54 PM EST up reply actions  

i would normally agree about height

But after watching Roland struggle with leverage really make me think about it more

Cincyjungle.com Provisional Contributor for the NFL Draft
Follow me on Twitter for Bengals & NFL draft talk

by Joe Goodberry on Feb 2, 2011 7:00 AM EST up reply actions  

yeah, but that's Roland at RT

The guy has about the equivalent mobility and flexibility as a California Redwood – What the coaches ever saw in him, I have no idea.

To some extent you probably have to take height into consideration (I’d rather not have Manute Bol for instance), but Roland is a bad comparison. The guy is simply not talented.

This is our year!

by Paul Cannon on Feb 2, 2011 8:57 AM EST up reply actions  

This fanpost gives me an idea for a future post.

Twitter - @joeGoodberry
You might remember me as "Firstpick"

by Joe Goodberry on Feb 1, 2011 12:24 PM EST reply actions  

your welcome! hahaha

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 1, 2011 12:25 PM EST up reply actions  

thank you friend

Cincyjungle.com Provisional Contributor for the NFL Draft
Follow me on Twitter for Bengals & NFL draft talk

by Joe Goodberry on Feb 1, 2011 12:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Thoughts

First and foremost, thank you for an excellent fanpost and a series of (mostly excellent) comments. It’s good to see the community is coming around to the idea that we aren’t picking a OT or Safety number 4 overall and the demands for the Bengals to trade back seem to be limited. I admit I have often grumbled for people to stop doing that because it’s not a Mike Brown thing, even though I personally believe that it would be best for the team. On the other hand, Brat was fired, so anything can happen. But I DO NOT think you trade away from a top 5 spot without getting 2 first rounders in return, just my opinion.

In a vacuum, here’s a rough idea of my ideal draft.

Round 1: AJ Green (second choice: Bowers)
I wanted Bowers for a long time but I’m starting to think that WR is a bigger weakness than D-Line. I don’t think Jerome Simpson is a number 1, though I think he’s a solid number 2. Green is a number one, and with a potentially inexperienced QB, it can help to have weapons on the outside, especially weapons not named TOcho. SIde Note: Fairley doesn’t drop here, or else he would be my pick because I think he’s on a different level than, well, everyone.

Round 2: Derrek Sherrod (second choice: Rodney Hudson)
I know people will call me names for picking these two and you may be right if you say Hudson would be available in the 3rd. My thinking is that in order to maximize the potential from this pick, I would like an O-Lineman with flexibility. Sherrod could play tackle, or possibly slide in at left guard depending on whether Man Boobs can handle tackle or will need to move to guard himself. I like Hudson more than other guards such as Cannon because he can also play Center very well, which gives us increased flexibility. Of course, should someone such as Carimi or T. Smith mysteriously slide out of the first round, I would pick them over Sherrod.

Round 3: DeAndre McDaniel (second choice: Deunta Robinson)
I think safety is a good choice here, and McDaniel provides the best option. I loved what I saw from him in the Senior Bowl. Robinson had a first round grade at the beginning of the season, but since he played for North Carolina, he naturally received a four game suspension. He also suffered a horrific broken leg in the bowl game, so he might be a steal later in the draft, but he was an absolute ball hawk when he played.

Round 4: Pat Devlin (second choice: Christian Ponder)
I think we need to go QB. These are two guys that might be available in the 4th round, or maybe they won’t be. Frankly, neither I nor anyone else knows at this point. Hey, I never would have guessed Colt McCoy would have lasted until the 85th pick last year, so hopefully there is a QB with good potential at this pick.

Rounds 5-7: Why guess?
I’m not going to bother fielding a guess. There will be good players that drop because of concerns about character and such. I would like to see the team grab an offensive lineman, a defensive lineman, and a linebacker with these picks. No kicker though. Between Nugent coming back and the fact that most good kickers are signed as Undrafted Free Agents rather than drafted (I theory I’m stating without facts to back it up) I think it’s a waste of a pick to get a kicker.

by Just Chris on Feb 1, 2011 5:28 PM EST reply actions  

I'm with you all the way through there

until Ponder. But that’s just a minor quibble. I’d like to see Kaepernick in the third. Not instead of McDaniel- safety being essential, but maybe as the pick we get for Chad. I think, realistically, Devlin gets more credit than he deserves because Flacco made people aware of Delaware. If there was no Flacco, I don’t think Devlin would be on anybody’s radar. Ponder has too much of an injury history for me to feel secure with longevity of his arm. Kaepernick, with a year or two to learn and bulk out a little, has all the tools to make an impact ala Josh Freeman- but a better runner.

by IgnatiusJReilly on Feb 1, 2011 6:12 PM EST up reply actions  

I would say one thing about kickers..

The Kicker out of Nebraska is prolly one of the better ones ive seen coming out of college for the past few years.

His 2008 Clutch 57 yrd kick over Colorado is still impressive. The kid is way clutch.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 1, 2011 6:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Plus

Henery is also a good punter, just in case Huber gets hurt or something.

by IgnatiusJReilly on Feb 2, 2011 1:18 AM EST up reply actions  

though in all honesty

I think we would have to use a 6th on him

he would be gone by our 7th rd picl

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 2, 2011 1:44 AM EST up reply actions  

As much as football fans don't like it

Kicker is an important position on the team, in fact kickers hold basically every scoring record in the NFL (outside of QBs).. so to get an elite kicker I think is worth it, even in the 6th round.

by The Dealio on Feb 2, 2011 9:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Nuge is a beast

I think we should wait and see if he can come back and be good. Sign a free agent or undrafted rookie to challenge him

by aguy on Feb 2, 2011 10:19 AM EST up reply actions  

No offense aguy

That’s the fan in all of us saying that.
That Nuge can come back. It was his kicking leg man.

He most likely can’t. I’m pulling for him but we have build.
And like IJR said he can punt too.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 2, 2011 1:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Just so you know...

Kickers come back from injuries all the time. Acl/Mcl ones are pretty bad, but he can come back and still be good. The questions about his return are a) can he get back to form without reinjuring the knee, and more importantly b) does he want to come back. If he comes back and reinjures the knee, he’s looking at probably getting a full knee replacement before he’s 40 if he’s doing some sort of rigorous exercise regularly. So he may choose not to try

by aguy on Feb 2, 2011 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

It's actually better that it's his kicking leg

instead of his plant leg. Plant leg is the knee that takes the brunt of force/torque on every single kick- I’ll try and find it, but there was an article interviewing Nuge and he sounds VERY confident (of course he would though) about his rehab and coming back stronger. I think Nuge will be just fine, but if he isn’t we do need a contigency plan that doesn’t soudn like a librarian kicker (Clint Stitser) just sounds like i want to punch him in the nose for no reason

The Curse of Bo Jackson: Jan 13th,1991- present day

by TruWhoDey on Feb 4, 2011 10:21 AM EST up reply actions  

Can someone explain

why everyone is in love with Simpson suddenly? I’d love for him to turn out decent so he wasn’t a wasted pick, but it took 2 years for the coaches to have the confidence to field him. He played mediocre with his horrible ball security and having two fumbles. Plus he’s done jack every time we played him before those last two games (in preseasons). And seeing as the coaches said they kept him off the field because he was having trouble adjusting to Pro level AND my biggest concern, learning the playbook. Especially since new OC means new playbook, it worries me to think we’d have him be a #1 or #2 receiver.

by aguy on Feb 1, 2011 7:42 PM EST up reply actions  

It's one thing to use him as a number 2

Say have him and Caldwell fight it out for #2.
If you brought a guy like AJ Green in to be the new #1

But fans love to hype up their teams. But what do you expect sometime fandom beats out reason

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 1, 2011 8:02 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd wouldn't be opposed to that

I like Caldwell a lot, but he still needs to prove himself too. I would just worry about having such a young receiving core. That is partially why I want Chad to stay.

by aguy on Feb 1, 2011 8:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Most cases I would argue for a veteran receiver

But is Chad really the guy you want to keep rubbing off on your young wr’s like Green?

Sure he may teach him a little, but do you want your young guys to have the ego?

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 1, 2011 8:10 PM EST up reply actions  

So long as their play backs it up

sure. Chad was cocky when he started to play well. He unfortunately continued when he stopped playing so well. And I don’t know that they will. Caldwell and Simpson should have egos by now if he was gonna rub off on them. So why should Green?

by aguy on Feb 1, 2011 8:53 PM EST up reply actions  

It's just more or less the

Bad apple ruins the bunch thing. Chad’s a diva wr. And he loves to pout when things aren’t going his way. And the whole carson getting more attention then him is eating away at him.

If it was someone say Donald Driver (just naming a random better character wr) sure, but i don’t think Chad is the mentor I want for young players. I just think Chad is too selfish of a player to take a B roll to his eventual replacement.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 1, 2011 9:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Caldwell and Simpson are both going into year 4 in the league

Scary thought, but by NFL standards, they are Vets. They both probably know the system inside and out by this point.

This is our year!

by Paul Cannon on Feb 1, 2011 10:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Caldwell does..

Simspon was prolly busy..

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 1, 2011 10:19 PM EST up reply actions  

And

new OC= new system. I agree that a Driver type character would be a good role model, but for learning how to handle being a rookie receiver, working with Chad and against Leon and J.Jo would be helpful wouldn’t it?

by aguy on Feb 1, 2011 10:23 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't know I just

don’t see chad being the a good mentor.
your argument is he would be a good one.

But the bigger thing I think is I honestly don’t think he would even want to mentor a guy like AJ green. And would view him as a threat rather than a teammate.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 1, 2011 10:25 PM EST up reply actions  

could be

no real way to know. I’d like to see them both starting this season and rotate Caldwell, Shipley, and Simpson. If Chad’s gone I want him for sure. I just wish someone would give Chad a little slap to wake him up so he starts playing again instead of goofing off. Maybe Marvin should accept that cage match challenge…. hahaha

by aguy on Feb 1, 2011 10:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I think this is a pretty fair concern

But hey, he played great those last three games… no doubt about it. I have the same worry about a new O.C. coming in with a new system. Will Simpson grasp it in time? Personally, I think its worth the risk to grab one of those stud Defensive players

by The Dealio on Feb 1, 2011 8:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm just excited

I was a big proponent of drafting him out of Coastal Carolina- mainly because of his athleticism and hands, and even I had almost written him off before his late season debut. Of course we can’t just pencil him in at #1 and call it a day. That’s why I’m behind drafting Green at 4. It probably will be somewhat of a different scheme and I can see it taking a little time- both for a rookie like Green and Simpson to master it. I just don’t see Caldwell as a starting NFL wide receiver and Shipley is slot all the way. Now, it could be that Jerome IS our big, downfield threat and a more Desean Jackson like running mate might be in order. Titus Young or that kid out of Troy- Jernigan?.

by IgnatiusJReilly on Feb 2, 2011 1:25 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't see Caldwell as the starter.

Hell, I see SImpson, Caldwell, and Shipley used in the same way that Housh, Henry, and Ocho were five years ago. If I remember right, Housh was the starter and they brought Henry in on the outside to draw pressure off the top for Housh to work his magic.

by Doc Scratch on Feb 2, 2011 9:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Problem is

they aren’t Housh, Slim, and Chad. Chad was a huge deep threat and often drew double coverage. T.J. was the reliable hands who could get open. And slim was speedy and had a LB or safety trying to pick him up so one of the other 2 couldn’t make a play. Simpson, Caldwell, and Shipley can’t do that.

by aguy on Feb 2, 2011 10:08 PM EST up reply actions  

MOCK DRAFT

1. de or dt
2.gaurd
3.center
4.wide reciever that can stretch the field
5.fullback
6.best available
7.best available
I say we just pick up a couple qbs in free agency and maybe wait on a better draft class with Luck next year if we suck again.

by diehard fan on Feb 1, 2011 7:58 PM EST reply actions  

safety?

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 1, 2011 8:12 PM EST up reply actions  

do we need a center

and is there, beyond Wizniewski and O’Dowd, a center that will be available there. The kid from Slippery Rock- Fusco?

by IgnatiusJReilly on Feb 2, 2011 1:26 AM EST up reply actions  

Hudson can play guard

I really don’t think Odowd will be a starting C in the NFL

Cincyjungle.com Provisional Contributor for the NFL Draft
Follow me on Twitter for Bengals & NFL draft talk

by Joe Goodberry on Feb 2, 2011 7:03 AM EST up reply actions  

Hudson was horrible in preseason last year

yeah, he was drafted as a project, but I wouldn’t count on him for anything at this point.

This is our year!

by Paul Cannon on Feb 2, 2011 9:07 AM EST up reply actions  

What about Reggie Stephens?

He played great in the preseason. I’m excited to see him compete with Kyle Cook.

by Cry on Feb 2, 2011 12:22 PM EST up reply actions  

I think I'd want to see him more.

My initial impression that is he will be a capable backup, but it’s hard to say until he plays against the Steelers and the Ravens lines, I’ll reserve judgment.

This is our year!

by Paul Cannon on Feb 2, 2011 4:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Rodney Hudson... sorry

Cincyjungle.com Provisional Contributor for the NFL Draft
Follow me on Twitter for Bengals & NFL draft talk

by Joe Goodberry on Feb 2, 2011 10:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Are you that high on Rodney

fitting in the AFCN.. I think he has too small of a frame.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 2, 2011 11:06 PM EST up reply actions  

not at Guard

I think he would be a good Center for us

Cincyjungle.com Provisional Contributor for the NFL Draft
Follow me on Twitter for Bengals & NFL draft talk

by Joe Goodberry on Feb 3, 2011 4:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Otis Hudson

Our 5th round draft pick from last year

by The Dealio on Feb 2, 2011 10:00 AM EST up reply actions  

no, Iggy was right

Cincyjungle.com Provisional Contributor for the NFL Draft
Follow me on Twitter for Bengals & NFL draft talk

by Joe Goodberry on Feb 3, 2011 4:24 PM EST up reply actions  

BTW

Just an update for everyone

After a long close race, A.J. Green is in the lead of the poll.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 1, 2011 9:07 PM EST reply actions  

So let's say were looking for a 3rd round QB

We have a two 3rd rounders because we dealt Chad.

(even if you don’t want one, give me your input on WHICH QB you would draft at that pick)

Let’s say the available QB’s are
Kaepernick
Dalton
Devlin
Stanzi
Ponder
McElroy

Who would you draft?

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 1, 2011 10:32 PM EST reply actions  

we dealt Chad?

are you speaking hypothetically or did I somehow not hear the news?

Moisture is the essense of wetness, and wetness is the essense of beauty.

by Blue Steel on Feb 1, 2011 10:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Hypotheticalness sir.

Or if it makes u feel better say they all made it to the top of the 4th ;)

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 1, 2011 10:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Top of 4th

would be awesome, but they won’t all be there haha

by aguy on Feb 1, 2011 10:55 PM EST up reply actions  

haha, okay

soon hopefully though….

Moisture is the essense of wetness, and wetness is the essense of beauty.

by Blue Steel on Feb 2, 2011 7:09 AM EST up reply actions  

Personally

I like Kaepernick the most, then maybe Dalton. Ponder would be alright but I worry about his health. Stanzi is probably a stretch. All of them are projects most likely though. When it comes to QB, I’m just waiting to see what happens with CP and what we do the first 2 rounds

by aguy on Feb 1, 2011 10:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Personally

I’m torn between Dalton and Kaepernick.
KC has a huge upside if you get any of that potential out he could be a massive talent.
Dalton is just a winner plain and simple, the kid finds ways to win and was a big leader at TCU.

And for the sake of this let’s say the draft so far was
Green, Ijalana, McDaniel and now we’re looking QB

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 1, 2011 11:05 PM EST up reply actions  

lol did not mean to steal ur tag line

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 1, 2011 11:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Really should trade for someone.

Don’t think that the QB’s in the draft are franchise QB’s. Maybe next year.

by ddbumpus on Feb 1, 2011 11:24 PM EST up reply actions  

like i said sir lol

you must chooose

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 1, 2011 11:43 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't like Dalton

but, then, I’m prejudiced against gingers. ; )

by IgnatiusJReilly on Feb 2, 2011 1:27 AM EST up reply actions  

none

but if i had to choose… ponder

by trussell70 on Feb 3, 2011 10:51 AM EST up reply actions  

and im pretty sure

that a lot of those guys are gonna fall further than 3rd rd but i still dont think we need to draft any of those guys

by trussell70 on Feb 3, 2011 10:54 AM EST up reply actions  

Kaep or Dalton

woudl both fit the new smash mouth WCO we’re about to run…

The Curse of Bo Jackson: Jan 13th,1991- present day

by TruWhoDey on Feb 4, 2011 10:28 AM EST up reply actions  

draft

1. wr- aj green
2. dt- marvin austin
3. best guard/center (orlando franklin, marcus cannon, clint boling, rodney hudson, stefen winiewski)
4. ss- ahmad black
5. fs-deunta williams/ de- greg romeus
6. best o-lineman/fullback- charles clay
7. cb- richard sherman

by trussell70 on Feb 2, 2011 7:03 AM EST reply actions  

Advice for Mikey Brown

Advice for our GM / Owner / Thrift-mister / Mr. Nepotism:
I won’t charge MB the full-price of a scout’s salary for this info…so someone see that he gets this, please

BIG MOVES
End the misery – no more Bob bratkowsky (check) bring in Chow!
Carson Palmer to S.F. for 2nd rounder, two fourth rounder’s (I’ll miss CP, but better for both)
Trade Philly Eagles 2nd round pick and Chad Johnocho for Kevin Kobb
Franchise tag Jonathan Joseph
Allow Cedric Benson to walk
Pick up Brandon Jacobs in Free Agency – perfect RB for our system and the AFC North

FREE AGENCY
Resign Center Kyle Cook, Guard Evan Mathis (Pray he can stay healthy), FB Brian Leonard, LB’s Dhani Jones and Brandon Johnson, Saftey’s Ndukwe and Nelson, DL Fanene

DRAFT: Nothing fancy…just filling needs
Round 1 (late 20’s): OL Anthony Coztanzo (can play any position on line but Center)
Round 2 (45): RB Mikel Leshoure (ILL.); WR Torrey Smith (Maryland)
Round 3: Safety Will Hill (Fla.)
Round 4: CB Demarcus Van #### (Miami)
Round 4: Center Tim Barnes (Missouri)
Round 4: Best RB avalible – project for future
5,6,7 – 3 LB’s fighting for one spot (trick from Steelers playbook)
Compensatory picks – Best player’s available

Come on Brown – let’s shoot for those elusive winning seasons!
“Every year – a NFL team will win four games and lose four games – its those other eight that make up the season”

by True Pete Rose Grit on Feb 2, 2011 3:35 PM EST reply actions  

Forgot to mention – trade down from 4th pick – grab extra pics if possible

by True Pete Rose Grit on Feb 2, 2011 3:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Interesting take on it

I will say 1 thing. Will Hill will not go that high in the 3rd his character issues are off the charts

http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2011/1/19/1943956/the-happy-football-life-of-will-hill

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 2, 2011 4:38 PM EST up reply actions  

It's safe to say.

I don’t see him going too early in this draft.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 2, 2011 9:26 PM EST up reply actions  

I am against dealing Palmer,

but I am all about trading down and attempting to move Chad. I would love to see us draft Linemen with both early picks, because it doesn’t matter what we do at QB if we don’t have a line to block. An elite OLine could have make Akili Smith look average. QB=Overrated. All about trying to make this OLine great and make Carson a Pro Bowler again, which he could be (though I am sure many will disagree).

I also dislike Brandon Jacobs. Ideally, you would think he would be good in the AFC North, but the guy is softer than he should be at his size.

by kennythered on Feb 4, 2011 2:22 PM EST up reply actions  

I used to be against it a lot more.

I’m accepting it as I think it may happen.

We need a new offensive play maker. If we bring in a new play book Jerome may not catch on so easily. (lol) And Chad may very well be dealt. So I feel it’s OK in my book at least consider the #1 WR. No he doesn’t promise a super bowl. But it at least is a good start to give who ever the new QB is to give them elite weapons.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 2, 2011 9:51 PM EST up reply actions  

groan. Another 3 years for Simpson to learn the playbook?

If I were the coaches I would give him like 3 routes, and leave it there.

This is our year!

by Paul Cannon on Feb 3, 2011 12:57 AM EST up reply actions  

Aight Jerome

Go long.

Seems simple enough right

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 3, 2011 12:59 AM EST up reply actions  

I'd rather build the lines.

Specifically interior. We need more help there, what happened to the “NO TOP 5 RECEIVER” brigade.

Also I don’t buy the “Jerome can’t catch on” line, it seems as real as the “Dunlap doesn’t know how to practice” line the coaches tried to feed us. They covered him up depth-wise for years (thanks Chad).

This is why I hate the Bowers and Green picks. They both stunt players with massive potential. Getting good players in the draft is great but continually covering growing players in place of rookies is silly, it’s basically preventing the players who need the experience to get good from getting it in favor of some college kid. I have faith in Jerome and Michael Johnson to do damn good but we need to give them the time to reach their potentials instead of just covering them up again after they waited to get uncovered in the first place. Give me Fairley. Give me Dareus. Hell, give me Carimi. But I don’t give me Green or Bowers. That’s not helping this team.

I also have faith in Caldwell too, since they figured out he’s a deep threat and not a possession guy.

by Doc Scratch on Feb 3, 2011 2:09 AM EST up reply actions  

We need to be beef up the line 100% agree

Do i want A.J. green not necessarily, no.

Do I realistically think the Bengals may draft him. Yes I do.
I’ve always tried to get the most realistic choice. And A.J. Green would help get a passing game going. Caldwell can very well be a 4th wr, but that’s the thing with these pro sports. You have to upgrade the guys with just potential to guys who can actually translate it to the field.

Personally the big board is now.
Fairley Bowers Green Quinn

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 3, 2011 11:28 AM EST up reply actions  

What about Dareus?

And who says Green will actually translate his potential too? The draft is a gamble on some arbitrary measure of talent as well as the ability to realize that potential (and believe me, it’s totally arbitrary, just look at all the raving on Blaine Gabbert that didn’t start until Luck decided against coming out, people have him rated higher than Bradford and I’ll bet $20 Bradford will end up having a better career than Gabbert ever will).

But yeh, my picks are basically Fairley and Dareus.

by Doc Scratch on Feb 3, 2011 5:42 PM EST up reply actions  

You can't make the translate talent to the next level argument

When talking about one player to the next.

How do you know Dareus will?

It’s a hard argument to make.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 3, 2011 5:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Fair enough. :v

I just find it redundant to cover up players with the potential to be well with other players who are only selling their potential in the first place. Drafting Fairley or Dareus won’t really cover up too much given how much we rotate our DLinemen, specifically our tackles (I’m not as opposed to Bowers, I just don’t understand how we’d use him, specifically on third down scenarios), but we don’t rotate receivers too frequently.

by Doc Scratch on Feb 3, 2011 6:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Wouldn't fairley cover up Geno or Pat Sims ;)

aka more potential.

And isn’t it more of a point to upgrade a position that position that rotates less?
I mean I know I’m playing devils advocate here pretty hard.
But who has a hire level or potential. AJ Green or Caldwell?
Who has the actual potential to be an elite wr in the league?

I like Caldwell. But you got to look at it from all angles.

And let me ask this. If we draft Green, are you going to be pouting or all excited we drafted the top offensive weapon in the draft.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 3, 2011 9:25 PM EST up reply actions  

It depends on who's there.

If we took Green with Fairley on the board (I’m not that dependent on Dareus, he projects better as a 3-4 end), I’d be right pissed but then again, I don’t feel like I’d be alone in that. If we took Green with like Peterson and Quinn on the board, I probably wouldn’t mind. I’m not a fan of our current position in the draft as I don’t like a lot of the top talent in comparison to our needs (basically only DT is a huge need and the best ones could be off the board by the time we pick). We need a guard, FS, and DT. The best picks are DT, a 3-4 End, a 3-4 OLB, a CB, a 4-3 End, and a WR so as long as we’re not passing up on Fairley, I can be okay with whatever we pick up as long as it helps.

I just don’t see the point in us drafting a WR after Jerome made us all eat crow and I really doubt we pick up Green after how much of an impact Jerome made in those last three games. If we do get him, oh well, I’m not in charge of this offense and I’m curious about how Gruden would use two receivers with #1 potential (but without the ego or age). I just don’t see the point.

by Doc Scratch on Feb 3, 2011 9:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Whoops, SS, we've got Reggie and Crocker for the FS position.

I don’t see the Gerbil catching on and Ndukwe’s a backup for a reason.

by Doc Scratch on Feb 3, 2011 10:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Jerome made us eat crow in the Old Offense

He’ll need more time to learn this new offense. I heard through some “insider sources” he’s a total idiot.

Fairley > Green every time

Keep in mind. Green isn’t just the best WR, he’s the best offensive player in this draft. And I mean our offense could use the best weapon we could get.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 3, 2011 10:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeh, again, I won't be pissing in people's milk if we draft Green.

I just don’t buy that Jerome’s enough of an idiot that he can’t grasp the playbook in the offseason.

by Doc Scratch on Feb 3, 2011 10:04 PM EST up reply actions  

I think you underestimate his stupidity ;)

I heard from a source he is incredibly dumb lol.

Which I want to know his wonderlic

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 3, 2011 10:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Who's the source? :v

And yeh, he and Caldwell both, I heard Caldwell’s an idiot too.

At least they’re not dumb enough to be giant distractions over the season!

by Doc Scratch on Feb 3, 2011 10:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Do you know who Paul Sparling is?

Wonderlics:
Caldwell 8/14
Jerome 17/23 (2 tries)

btw Keith rivers was a 16

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 3, 2011 10:11 PM EST up reply actions  

read my response to Kenny

i explain my inside info :P

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 4, 2011 8:50 PM EST up reply actions  

It's a sad rumor about Jerome

because I have heard from some real inside sources, that he is not stupid and knows his routes, runs them better than anyone on the team (until we landed Shipley this past year). Jerome was Marvin’s guy, while TO/Chad/Henry/Bryant have been Brown’s guys. In 2008, the Eagles were ready to take Jerome instead of DeSean Jackson if he slipped one more slot and the Steelers had a deal in place with Redskins at 48 to trade up a few picks just to land Jerome. We were offered a 3rd rounder during the ‘09 draft for him and the Cowboys wanted him, not Henry for Marcellus Bennett. I really believe the guy has been a victim of some bad situations and some poor rumors, that are far from true. Jerome knew the playbook in year 1, he didn’t get a shot until year 3, due to Mikey.

by kennythered on Feb 4, 2011 2:32 PM EST up reply actions  

The athletic trainer's daughter

(paul sparling’s daughter,) said he dad thinks he’s one the “slower” player he’s ever met..
How do I know Paul Sparling’s daughter? She works at hooters in Newport :P

I’ve heard he’s a great athlete and has so much natural ability, but couldn’t translate it. And I’ve also heard Jerome was Mike Browns guy. If Jerome was really Marvins guy, Caldwell would’ve been benched while Jerome was out there during 09.

Our insider sources seem to be different. Mines the head trainer(through his daughter lol) who’s yours?

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 4, 2011 3:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Santa Clause

he knows all

Cincyjungle.com Provisional Contributor for the NFL Draft
Follow me on Twitter for Bengals & NFL draft talk

by Joe Goodberry on Feb 7, 2011 9:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Has anyone seen

that Jay Gruden (John’s little bro) might have been hired as OC?

by aguy on Feb 2, 2011 10:22 PM EST reply actions  

not a fan.

Unless we can use that sweet Arena football yo-yo motion, I don’t want him.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 2, 2011 10:31 PM EST up reply actions  

supposedly they may have already finished a deal with him. I’m not too crazy about him

by aguy on Feb 2, 2011 10:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Interested in why you aren't sold on Jon.

He seems to have all the right tools. Did great things with the Tuskers. UFL is a much higher level of football than AFL.

by Cry on Feb 3, 2011 10:53 AM EST up reply actions  

UFL is a higher level?

bigger field but the same talent level man.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 3, 2011 11:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Not so sure about that. Have you watched it?

Not many NFL call ups from the AFL, plenty from the UFL.

by Cry on Feb 3, 2011 12:02 PM EST up reply actions  

I watched both

And I was a Las Vegas Loco’s fan (thanks to DeDe)

I’d say the difference is more to the fact that it’s the same size field and closer to the same game, so players are more attracted to play in it.

It might be a small bit better, but I think it’s not a big talent difference.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 3, 2011 12:16 PM EST up reply actions  

just noticed

mikel leshoure is from illinois not cal

by trussell70 on Feb 3, 2011 1:39 PM EST reply actions  

i was think shane

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 3, 2011 1:51 PM EST up reply actions  

gotcha

i wasnt sure if you were thinking of him or just put cal on accident

by trussell70 on Feb 3, 2011 1:57 PM EST reply actions  

What does everyone think

of this kid, well not so much a kid really, from Baylor, Danny Watkins. Guy was a firefighter in the wilds of British Columbia until he went for a fire management course at Butte Community College in California. While he was there, he was talked into playing football and ended up doing two years there before getting a D-1 scholly in Waco. He’s an aggressive, nasty guard- 6’-4", 315, not a behemoth like Cannon. Probably available in the early 4th. Trouble is; dude’s 27. Now, he doesn’t have the wear and tear of a lifetime of football, so his longevity might be a little longer than one might normally suspect. He’s extremely tough, high character and, as a late-rounder, maybe cheap enough to take a shot on. Reminds me a little- in what little film and Senior Bowl footage I’ve seen, of Eric Steinbach. Anyone?

by IgnatiusJReilly on Feb 3, 2011 8:10 PM EST reply actions  

I like him

I think his age will crash his stock. (not a 6th or anything but considerably)

And your right I think he’ll be a late 3rd or possibly a 4th.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 3, 2011 9:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Something tells me

this guy would be a great asset to our line even if he only ended up as a sort of journeyman back-up. Winning a starting job would just be gravy. I’ve also been doing some research, reading scouting reports and watching film on LSU’s Joseph Barksdale. He’s 6’-5", 335lbs. and may be the best all-around linemen in the entirety of the draft. About the same size as Andre, he’s(according to walterfootball)“…by far the best technician in his draft class. He has elite knee bend, has textbook hand use, and displays nice patience in pass protection. He’s a very athletic, talented player who will eventually be climbing 2011 NFL Draft boards.” And I’m thinking Barksdale could play either tackle or guard, which I’m not sure Cannon could do. This could allow Andre to slide inside and the rookie to handle RT or vice versa. Thoughts?

by IgnatiusJReilly on Feb 3, 2011 9:38 PM EST up reply actions  

or move him to LG in addition to Andre sliding down to RG

and then keep Collins at RT…

Moisture is the essense of wetness, and wetness is the essense of beauty.

by Blue Steel on Feb 3, 2011 9:46 PM EST up reply actions  

If he's as good as you're raving, then we may need to trade back to get him.

Or hope to hell he improves his stock to top five material. I doubt he’ll be waiting in the early second with so many OL-needy teams.

by Doc Scratch on Feb 3, 2011 9:59 PM EST up reply actions  

it's amazing how some of the OT's stock dropped

like Sherrod and Costanzo (in many opinions) from earlier this year. Plus, how is 285 lb Tyron Smith, the second highest rated OT?

Moisture is the essense of wetness, and wetness is the essense of beauty.

by Blue Steel on Feb 3, 2011 10:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Johny-come-lately here

so, since we’re probably not going to get Fairley, and I know a few of you mentioned there weren’t any stellar DT’s coming out this year – besides Fairley – who would be an improvement over what we already have. Have any of you heard of Kenrick Ellis and what are your thoughts on him? 6-4, 335 lbs of what looks like a lot of bulk, could he possibly be a good pickup in one of the middle rounds?

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/567576-2011-nfl-draft-prospects-20-players-who-will-be-on-the-rise#page/13

Moisture is the essense of wetness, and wetness is the essense of beauty.

by Blue Steel on Feb 3, 2011 10:18 PM EST reply actions  

I look at Ellis being more of a 3-4 NT

Than a 4-3 DT.

but idk.

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 3, 2011 10:27 PM EST up reply actions  

I just want the next Ngata

whatever he is…. I figure if we keep bringing in 335+ guys, eventually one of them will pan out….

Moisture is the essense of wetness, and wetness is the essense of beauty.

by Blue Steel on Feb 3, 2011 10:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Isn't he a 3-4 NT lol

We dont want next Ngata we want next Sapp

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 3, 2011 10:43 PM EST up reply actions  

actually, Ngata supposedly plays DT

the other guy, I think Redding, is listed as the NT. Ngata seems to move up and down the line, depending on how the offense sets up. Basically, they put him whereever he can inflict the most damage with his 350 lb disruptive force of a body.

Moisture is the essense of wetness, and wetness is the essense of beauty.

by Blue Steel on Feb 3, 2011 10:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Kelly Gregg is NT, Ngata and Redding Play DE

On Nickel, Ngata Moves inside to DT

Cincyjungle.com Provisional Contributor for the NFL Draft
Follow me on Twitter for Bengals & NFL draft talk

by Joe Goodberry on Feb 7, 2011 9:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Ngata plays anywhere

no joke. He could be our best DE or best DT.

by kennythered on Feb 4, 2011 2:36 PM EST up reply actions  

We don't need a NT.

Just a disruptive DT. Atkins, Sims, and (to a lesser extent) Peko are nice. We just need one more guy with a mean streak in the rotation. Obviously Tank is not the answer.

by Cry on Feb 4, 2011 12:15 AM EST up reply actions  

I’m going to say we need upgrades in the DE rotation

over the DT rotation. If we can’t get Fairley, I rather go mid round and pick up romeus

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 4, 2011 12:21 AM EST up reply actions  

I think Dareus would be a perfect fit

and a possibility if Bowers, Peterson, and Fairley are all gone

by The Dealio on Feb 4, 2011 11:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Hopefully Atkins can be that Disruptive DT

Cincyjungle.com Provisional Contributor for the NFL Draft
Follow me on Twitter for Bengals & NFL draft talk

by Joe Goodberry on Feb 7, 2011 9:09 PM EST up reply actions  

carried a very athletic 350+ frame

I keep hearing it but keep laughing everytime

Hopefully my picture doesn't show my bias.

by C Byers on Feb 4, 2011 1:45 PM EST reply actions  

I think, for a very athletic

350lb. frame, one would need to be Shaq Diesel.

by IgnatiusJReilly on Feb 4, 2011 4:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Cincinnati Bengals.

Editor-In Chief

Cj_small Josh Kirkendall

Editor/Managing Editor

Rudiblanket_small Anthony Cosenza

5255_133614603784_666578784_2414703_1976100_n_small Jason Garrison

Authors

Photo_3_small BeerRun

010511170110_small Joe Goodberry

40297_422933299865_509514865_4658259_6466915_n_small Ryan Harper

Small Brennen Warner

Sb_nation_small Jack Cassidy

580551_10150822857707018_613867017_11694254_1239726425_n_small Nick_Crago

Img_0783_small Mike Fightmaster

Moderators

Nfl palewook

680764146_0eac16fabd_small 80%OFTHETIMEIMRIGHTEVERYTIME

Tawky_tawny_small UpStateMike

Joeb698_86e260_small joeb69

Bengals_stamp_by_jamaal10_small Doc Scratch