Mailbag: Was Mike Brown A Genius For Trading Carson Palmer Or Just Lucky?
Many readers have an opinion, but unlike our millions upon millions of members who comment on this site, those readers would rather not make themselves known to discuss (and sometimes debate) their points of view on the website. While I urge most people to join the discussions on the site, in the end its their prerogative. So we receive a good chunk of emails from readers in which I spend some time collaborating with, talking about the Bengals and the issues facing the Bengals. One of those readers sent me a question that got me thinking:
Do you think Mike Brown was a genius for holding onto Carson Palmer for so long?
In a word, no. My belief is that Brown was completely lucky, fully intending to adhere to the principles he echoed during July's press conference, saying that he won't reward players that demand a trade while under contract. If not for Cleveland's Chris Cocong breaking Jason Campbell's collarbone, this trade doesn't happen, which greatly benefited with Hue Jackson's previous association with the Cincinnati Bengals. According to ESPN NFL Insider Adam Schefter on Mike and Mike in the Morning on Wednesday, the Bengals declined an offer similar to what the Washington Redskins gave up for Donovan McNabb (two and a four); a deal that many experts believed the Bengals would have received.
Simply because Mike Brown refused to accept Washington's offer for a one and conditional three in 2008 for wide receiver Chad Ochocinco, I'm not exactly convinced that Brown was even willing to accept this trade, especially considering the headlines he's generated by being so stubborn with his point of view. And as one knows with Brown, when he takes a stance publicly, he will resist it with every molecule in his body. I believe, and this is nothing more than personal conjecture, Marvin Lewis and Katie Blackburn were needed to convince Brown to make the deal for two reasons; Help improve fan relations by acquiring a first and second round draft pick (you did see the reaction from all of us, right?) and as a path towards continual improvement with the team's foundation.
In the end, and that's all that matters, Brown deserves the credit for setting his "principles" aside and pulling the trigger. It concludes the suffocating story on Carson Palmer's tragic ending and it looks to the future with a certain foresight that this organization has lacked for some time. At the same time I'm not buying that Mike Brown expected all of this to happen, no. Patience is a virtue and it won out, but if not for Cocong's hit on Campbell last weekend, Palmer stays "retired" and we're looking at the 2012 NFL draft as the next window for a trade.
47 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'll say what I said the other day
Of course he was lucky…I can’t imagine any combination of circumstances coming together for one particular team the way this happened for us anytime again soon. Any one of those variables out of place and Carson is still sitting on his sofa right now.
BUT, there also wasn’t any other circumstance that could have gotten such a high price for Carson. If Mike Brown is the only owner/GM that wouldn’t have traded Carson Palmer sooner, then Mike Brown is the only owner/GM who could have gotten 2 first round picks for him at the trade deadline. You can feel how you like about that…it’s not the most comforting thought…but it’s the truth. And the bigger truth is that Mike Brown’s stubbornness could have just made this team a force in the AFC for the next decade. I don’t know about you, but I could forgive a whole lot of Akilii Smiths and David Klinglers for a Lombardi trophy or two. Maybe, just maybe, it took MB about 20 years to hit his stride. To be fair, he put together a championship caliber team in 2005. That talent was in place for a few more years. Let’s say 5 years from now Andy Dalton is polishing a Super Bowl ring and on his way to a few more. You could argue that half of Mike Brown’s tenure was actually fairly successful.
I think I just threw up in my mouth a little bit…
All luck
I’ll still give him love for making the trade happen, but had Campbell not gotten hurt then this never happens. Even if the Raiders were looking to get Carson with a healthy Campbell they definitely don’t offer two 1st round picks which would in turn mean MB never accepts a trade. But still…it happened. So kudos to MB.
whole ton of things had to happen
1) the cleveland browns knock campbell out.
2) the raiders were desperate to make the play offs to show something for al’s last year with the team
3) the raiders didnt want to deal with their hated rival (the broncos to get orton cheaper than palmer).
4) gerrard had surgery and couldn’t help the raiders.
5) mike brown said yes. in 21 years, this is the 1st time he’s ever said yes to a big trade.
" Mike Brown is the owner that Cincy doesn't deserve, not the one it needs..."
One thing getting lost in all of this
It hasn’t been confirmed, and probably never will be, but it sure sounds like Marvin and Katie were instrumental in getting MB to move on this. So yeah, in 20 years he has never done anything like this, but maybe that’s a sign that cooler heads (and at least one better football mind) are starting to take control over at PBS. Just imagine what this team looks like if these draft picks are used the way we’ve used our top picks the past couple years. Imagine adding FOUR Greshams or Greens or Maualugas to this team around Dalton. All week I’ve been walking around and all of a sudden realized that I have a big goofy smile on my face for no reason.
i read something on a blog somewhere
might have been espn or pft that suggested that scenario as the catalyst behind the trade. we’ll probably never know. doubt, katy is going to publicly torpedo her father.
" Mike Brown is the owner that Cincy doesn't deserve, not the one it needs..."
Maybe not until he is dead
If those draft picks become key players in a Bengals Super Bowl win, we will find out eventually because that is a story that wants to be told.
by LooseCannon on Oct 21, 2011 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions
He was lucky to get two (potential) first rounders
But if it hadn’t been the Raiders, another team probably would have come calling with some high draft picks and Palmer would have been traded during the offseason. A team like the Redskins that is probably too good to be out of the running for Luck, would have come looking for a seasoned Vet.
Whatever else you want to say about Brown, he played his cards right on this one and pounced at the absolute highest point of value for the former #1 overall pick – and for that you have to give him some credit.
by Paul Cannon on Oct 21, 2011 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions
Patience
is the answer here. Palmer gave the Bengals the stop sign at a time when it appeared our offense really needed his experience. Fortunately, we lucked out that Andy Dalton was ready so Brown could now solely ‘punish’ Palmer. It’s a no brainer that Brown likely considered some teams might come calling at some point in the year due to other QB injuries. By maintaining an unrelenting public stance, he was able to drive up the price. Thus, Brown can’t be considered lucky because even the most adamant owners are usually business minded understanding the basic concept of supply and demand.
E. All of the above
Imagine the adjectives if mb rejected offer….
by quickslant on Oct 21, 2011 10:51 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Voted for being extremely lucky........
he waited intentionally, which obviously turned out to be the right move. But no one ever imagined anyone would give up what they did (especially since Campbell isn’t exactly Tom Brady). It’s still hard for me to understand how the Raiders think Palmer is that “missing piece” that will put them over the top for a title. They’re not a bad team, but I don’t think of them as a championship caliber team.
by The Van Buren Boys on Oct 21, 2011 10:51 AM EDT reply actions
a little of both
Everyone knew it was possible a team would lose a starter and go after palmer, it was just if they would be desperate enough to give mike brown what he wants. He got lucky a team with playoff hopes lost a qb, but that wouldn’t had happens if he unloaded him for a 3rd or so in the offseason.
by JCompton41 on Oct 21, 2011 10:54 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
lol you basically said what i was going to say...
i think it was a calculated risk, but who knew Campbell was going to get hurt, who happened to be an ex-coach of carsons and would be willing to give up a higher pick for the trade. But you have to give props to Brown because most owners/GM would have a knee jerk reaction and would have traded Palmer in training camp to the Seahawks for maybe at most a 2nd round pick.
AMAS
It was luck that jason got hurt
but it was his patience that allowed him to make this deal. as others have noted, if brown doesn’t take the stance he did, most other GM would have traded him in the offseason for maybe a fourth round pick! He had nothng to lose and everything to gain. If he waits till the offseason, he trades him to someone (maybe the raiders anyway) for prob a 2nd, and another pick. Or the waits till a QB gets hurt (which happens every year) and holds that GM for ransom and gets what he did.
He played the game smart and got the big prize instead of settling
somewhere in the middle
After the 2011 draft occured about the best you could have expected for Palmer were future draft picks. Sure they could have traded him for a player and picks but their history of trading player for player is sketchy at best. So until the 2012 draft happens Palmer had some value. Lord Brown did not have to make a move till then. That was the genious part. The lucky part was the series of events that happened to the Raiders, and the timing of those events. Less then two days before the trading dead line their starting QB goes down thus creating a need lucky was Hue Jackson being in charge with the void involved with the passing of Al Davis. Hue seems to be the biggest living Palmer fan.
pure luck
If not for Campbell going down, the Bengals would have gotten absolutely nothing out of Carson Palmer this year. Could Brownie have expected it? No. Hoped for it maybe, but he was obviously content to get nothing out of Palmer vs accepting a lower pick. I can understand why he did it, but that doesn’t change the fact that it was a huge stroke of luck that the Bengals got what they did.
Some credit is due to Brown though
because he could have done what everybody else told him to do and traded him away as soon as the CBA was signed. It doesn’t matter if it was stupidity or strategy that made him wait, because the moment that Palmer’s value was at its peak, Mike Brown made the right move – and in the end, that’s all that mattered.
by Paul Cannon on Oct 21, 2011 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions
I don;t really care...
It was a good move! Nuff said!
I represent the Bengals of Cincinati with extreme passion and prejudice and make no apologies for it!
I think it's entirely results oriented
Just because he lucked into a really lopsided trade doesn’t mean he played it well.
Even with the substantial offer, it sounds like he still needed to have his arm twisted by Katie and Marvin.
I don’t think this is the case, but just because I enjoy being cynical of ole Mikey: the attendance was hurting him, and the only reason he agreed to the trade (even after he was getting ridiculous value) was because the attendance would drop substantially further if the fans found out he could get a 1st and a conditional 1st for the guy but still refused the trade. Eh? There you go. I’ve just turned the best thing he’s done in years into a negative about his greed.
Seriously, though, I think it’s foolish to give MB any credit for this. Whether it’s Marvin or him, certainly somebody deserves kudos for some of the things going on here the past couple years, but I really don’t think this trade is one of them.
I think Marvin and Katie were involved
But not to the point where they needed to talk him into accepting this deal. I think they were the ones that twisted his arm into discussing the trade. I really dont’ think even Mike Brown would have ever dreamt of turning down the offer he got. But when Hue Jackson started calling, it probably took Marvin and Katie to get MB to the table in the first place.
Not that we'll ever know
But I think that Mikey is too principled to accept the deal on his own. He strikes me as the type who would refuse any offer just to keep Palmer retired and “win” the situation.
As said, though, we’ll probably never know.
There were three main factors in this
1. A Highly Improbable Series of Events: not just Campbell getting hurt, but the fact that it happened right before the trade deadline, to a team that hasn’t been competitive in a while and is desperate to win now, Garrard announcing that he needed surgery (thus removing their most affordable option), the emotional resolve created by Al Davis’ passing, Pryor being unable to practice with the team until recently, etc. This is like a Rube Goldberg contraption, or Mousetrap.
2. Mike Brown being willing to make a spectacularly-beneficial deal. This is new territory for him, after his failure to say “yes” to the Ricky Williams trade and the 2008 Chad trade. I do believe our little senior citizen is finally growing up.
3. The freaky omen/sacrifice value created by all those Bengal tigers that were killed in Ohio, this week. Multiple Bengal tigers killed = Carson magically traded. Between this and lightning striking Touchdown Jesus, I think those Supernatural guys need to visit Ohio and see what’s going on.
by Big Sky Bengal on Oct 21, 2011 11:47 AM EDT reply actions
Off topic...
Ryan Fitzpatrick about to sign a $10 million/year contract? Seriously? I love what Fitz has done over a 6 game span, but they can’t really think he’s a $10 million QB.
its because, thats the average for a quality QB not elite QB
Any team will give a QB 10 million a year if he can manage the offense like the coaches want it to be managed…. 10 million for a qb isn’t a lot its status quo
AMAS
not just for six games
he has done it all of last year since he took over. He has but up good numbers in that offense and 10 illion is about right for him
i dont disagree with that....
I’m just saying that’s what the bills see in him… I think he does a lot behind the scenes too..
AMAS
Cmon Be real
The whole trade was luck on our part and desperation on the Raiders part for losing their starting QB. If Campbell didn’t go down we probably wouldn’t trade Palmer and lucky for a 3rd next.
31 out of 32 owners/GMs
would have traded carson sooner for less… the fact that Brown knew he was willing to take a less for carson before next draft to prove a point. It was a calculated risk that paid off because no one knew campbell was going to get hurt. So thats the credit Brown deserves, because all other gms and owners would have gotten less.
AMAS
Yes, there was luck involed, but PATIENCE is the answer.
If there is no patience this deal doesn’t get made either. If he has no patience he trades Palmer right off the bat for a 3rd maybe a 2nd at the very most. Waiting till the season gets underway was a great move. It’s almost a guarantee that SOME team will have a major injury to their QB. If that team has playoff hopes and their backup don’t give any hope, that team is gonna offer a lot to pull Carson out of retirement. So, he played the odds that he would get a better offer mid season. That is patience and being a smart businessman. The LUCKY part was that it happened to the Raiders with Hue Jackson, right after Al Davis dies, and 2 days before the trade deadline. Like I said, there was some luck there to get as much value as we did, but it was PATIENCE that really made the deal happen.
If you believe the reports
This deal might not have been made without Hue Jackson’s personal connection to Mike Brown. So, even if you argue that some team would have had an injured quarterback, it’s possible that Brown would have turned down this trade with almost any other team.
by LooseCannon on Oct 21, 2011 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions
We will never really know...
No one knows what was going on in the Front Office. Everyone can speculate all they want, but who was in the front office when this went down? I don’t know because I wasn’t there.
it's just like in star wars....
in Return of the Jedi and Luke is meeting w/the Emperor, and the rebels on the forest moon of endor are being captured by the empire’s forces, and the rebel fleet is flying into a trap, and Luke is captured & on the death star….
Everything is turning to crap for the rebellion, and the Emperor sneers, “Everything is proceeding as i have forseen it.”
Just like with Mike Brown:
He knew the Raiders would be 4-2.
He knew the Raiders would lose their starting QB.
He knew the Raidersw ould be desperate to give up the farm for a declining QB.
He knew that Al David would be dead and wouldn’t stop such a rediculous trade.
There is no luck involved, as Mike Brown would say, “Everything is proceeding as i have forseen it.” :-)
Ok. But...
I think you guys are missing the point here: Ok we got the the picks, now we need to meke those picks count. We need some high quality scouters or at least know if ML will stay here for a long time, so we can draft some players that can play in this system.
by Salvador Verduzco Uzcanga on Oct 21, 2011 12:58 PM EDT reply actions
luckily but don't agree...
While I agree that it was a lucky break, I think this and the proposed deal with Washington were different circumstances. Also, in many cases most trades are based on needs of one team and the other team being lucky enough to be able to give up a player because of backup players can fill the position, and that’s why I think the 2 trades were different:
In the case of the Chad trade, Cincinnati at the time did not have a replacement player of a similar quality to take his place. If there was a proven replacement player on the roster that could step into the position without effecting the rest of the offense, then I could see a trade being made.
In the case of Palmer trade, I think we do see this replacement player (Andy Dalton), while he may not be flashy and is still a rookie, the Bengals are 4-2 (higher then where many people thought we would be) and I could see where Mike Brown could get rid of Palmer for a younger QB that has shown he can make this team a competitive team.
I agree they had no Chad 8/5 replacement
The conventional wisdom at the time was to make the trade and use the 1st round pick on the top WR that they would have gotten in Washington’s spot (Devin Thomas).
If we had made the trade and grabbed Devin Thomas we would have looked like idiots.
Granted, D Thomas didn’t have the baggage that you get with Chad, but he would have been a huge downgrade at the WR position.
In the 2008 draft, had they traded Chad Eight-Fifths, they would have been depleted at WR.
They would have been forced to draft a replacement.
The top 5 WR’s in that draft selected were:
Donnie Avery (taken #33)
Devin Thomas (#34)
Jordy Nelson (#36)
James Hardy (#41)
Eddie Royal (#42)
That draft also included such gems going in the first 2 rounds like Malcolm Kelly, Limas Sweed and Dexter Jackson.
None of those guys were worth adding in lieu of Chad. And the trade would have looked terrible.
Plain old dumb luck
MB was going to hold onto Palmer simply because of his principles and force his retirement. This was not a strategic or even planned move because there were so many previous offers that were declined. MB’s decision was influenced by his relationship with Hue and the fact that if was leaked that he didn’t trade Palmer, in return for what was on the table, there would have been an overthrowing of the Bengal’s government by good and patient people of Cincinnati.
Our last few draft classes have been impressive and production from those classes have exceeded the majority of expectations. I’m encouraged by having 2 first round picks in 2012 and possibly 2 more in 2013.
Couple things...
MB never said he wasn’t going to trade Palmer… he said that he wouldn’t trade him unless he got the right value for him, which was 2 first rounders… something none of us ever thought would happen, so we just assumed he was just gonna let Palmer retire.
Second, if he hadn’t made a trade, it wouldn’t be likely that we would know that there were serious discussions, and it would be much less likely that we would know exactly what was offered and declined in this hypothetical.
I've said it before
There is only one organization in the NFL that is dumber than us and that’s the Oakland Raiders.
What do you do when there's no way out? Find a way to get deeper in it.
Some old fashioned vitriole-
I do not want two first round picks for Palmer, I want to see the same 4-12, pick six Palmer that played for us last year.
We all know that it was dumb luck, period. And I actually half believe that MB had to be talked into the trade, as dumb as that actually sounds out loud.
This new CBA may be the best thing to ever happen to the Bengals since MB now must be competitive in salary, and rookies won’t be making the multi million dollar deals they have in the past. This means it is not that expensive to trade up in the draft. It is possible that having multiple picks is as important as how high you are drafting as being able to package a good trade will enable you to trade up in position. Look for teams to be less willing to trade picks in the future as these economics catch up.
Lucky, stubborn, out of touch?
I question the depth of dumb that is intrinsically Brown; as an acting GM. Is it a permanent condition? He is not wired for the job and it seems inevitable that vintage Brown will appear again, soon after this stumble-luck-high has subsided.
I was exactly the right strategy
Kick Carson to the curb and ignor the first offers. The preseason offers had to be garbage. The best offers would be from a desperate team before the deadline or before the next draft., in that order. I’m surprisedit took this long for someone to get desperate to save their season. I figured there would be either injury or performance issues by now that would drive up the price.
It’s genius to a point in that in that he had to see the right business strategy here to get max value for his asset. It’s luck to a point that matters outside of his control, however probable, needed to unfold his way. It’s a calculated risk in that regard. That’s true of any business deal.
I think the issue here is that he probably chose the right strategy for the wrong reason (emotions) and needed to be cajoled into executing it deftly.
In that regard it’s serendipity that he bungled his vengeance into a jackpot.
That’s pure luck!
by K312 on Oct 21, 2011 8:01 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Mike Brown is not stupid!
His strategy is infuriating to football fans who want to see their team win, but it isn’t dumb. His two strategic goals are to (1) parlay his monopoly over pro football in the Cincinnati metro area into as much money as possible, and (2) maintain unchallenged authority over the franchise, so that nobody interferes with objective #1. If MB cared about opinion on these fan blogs, he’d probably view us as babes in the woods who would have given up Carson for the first crap deal that was offered. After all, he is the guy that fleeced Hamilton County for PBS, right?
Carson got tired of the personal empire that puts return to shareholders (the Browns) over winning, so he left. MB’s goal was to maximize value for the asset, and he did so. It fits with the bigger idea that he wants the team just competitive enough and the fans just hopeful enough that he gets a crowd of 60,000 out to each game. If the team happens to win big once in a while, so much the better. If it wins consistently, then it means he’s overpaying the players. After all, if the Bengals won back to back Super Bowls, it’s not like you could fit 90,000 people per game in the stadium the next year.

by 



























