Cincinnati Bengals' Top-Ranked Defense Is Justified
Initially we were cautious about making a big deal regarding Cincinnati's top defensive ranking Monday morning for two reasons. One the weekend wasn't over with two teams remaining for Monday Night Football. Two the Bengals defense hasn't been challenged yet to really promote the team's defensive ranking as a grandiose achievement.
Now it's time to briefly amend both.
Currently the Cincinnati Bengals have allowed a league-low 275.5 yards of total offense through four games this year. There's a chance that either the Indianapolis Colts or Tampa Bay Buccaneers could supersede the Bengals as best defense by Tuesday morning. And by chance, we mean that Colts have to give up less than seven yards of total offense and the Buccaneers will literally have to post the best defensive performance in the history of the NFL with -52 total yards allowed.
Alright so the chances aren't probable.
Save for an aberration in 2010, this is the defense Bengals fans expected to carry over from the 2009 season when Cincinnati ranked fourth in the NFL. How good are they? The rankings alone tell that story:
| Statistic | Rank | |
| Total Defense | 275.5 | 1st |
| Rushing Defense | 86.8 | 7th |
| Passing Defense | 188.8 | 3rd |
| Scoring Defense | 18.5 | 6th |
| Third Downs | 32% | 3rd |
| 1st Downs Allowed | 16.0 | 4th |
| Yards per Play | 4.4 | t-1st |
| QB Sacks | 10.0 | t-12th |
| Forced Fumbles | 6 | 4th |
The curious nature of being a Bengals fan includes the perfected art of finding ways to be suspicious of a Bengals achievement. Not only can't we accept the fact that Cincinnati beat an undefeated team, we'll find ways to complain about the nature of that win. It wasn't that the Bengals beat the Bills, it was that the Bengals were gift-wrapped favorable calls from the officials. After all the Bills aren't really that good; swelling Cincinnati's defensive rankings. So forth and so on.
Yet these people do exist, and God love 'em we've been their brothers and sisters for the better part of 20 years. Pessimism is strongest among older fans, having gone through the period that must not be named after Paul Brown's death and before Marvin Lewis' arrival.
That begs the question, do you have a problem with someone shunning Cincinnati's defensive ranking, pointing out three of the offenses the Bengals have played are ranked outside the top 20?
Personally I don't have a problem with someone making the argument; I just have no reason to use that as a crutch holding any of us back from the praise that these guys deserve.
Before Sunday's meeting against the Buffalo Bills, the Cincinnati Bengals already sported the league's third-best defense; so the whole defensive thing didn't come out of nowhere. We were anxious for this contest because it would be the best measuring device to really gauge Cincinnati's defense. Buffalo came into the game averaging 37.7 points/game (1st in the NFL) and 431 yards (3rd). When the Bengals defense used up the Bills like recycled toilet paper, Buffalo fell 17.7 points and 158 yards shy of those averages.
After Mike Nugent converted a 21-yard field goal to reduce Cincinnati's deficit to 11 points, the Buffalo Bills jogged onto the field with 11:23 remaining in the third quarter, marking their first possession of the second half. From their own 20-yard line, quarterback Ryan Fitzpatrick handed off to running back Fred Jackson. Defensive tackle Geno Atkins was literally an immovable object, even through the attempted strain of an attempted double team, clogging the point of attack. Michael Johnson crashed down neutralizing the outside while Thomas Howard and Rey Maualuga made the tackle for a limited two-yard gain after Jackson realized he had nowhere to go. You could almost see it now, singing a country song. They took my running lane, away ran my dame...
On the following play, Fitzpatrick stood behind center in shotgun with an empty backfield. Michael Johnson and Geno Atkins, on the right (from the defensive perspective), bull rushed their perspective offensive linemen until Johnson detached into Fitzpatrick's legs a full second before Atkins knocked Fitzpatrick's upper body sideways. The second down quarterback sack virtually ended the possession before third down.
Early during the fourth quarter, the Buffalo Bills were preparing to record their 17th play during a possession that began with 5:26 remaining in the third. Three third downs had already been converted and the drive was the Mona Lisa of ball control. However the Bills accidentally fell behind schedule two plays prior with an incomplete to Donald Jones (pass was low) and a no-gain Fred Jackson run during the Robert Geathers' comeback tour.
Third down and ten from the 12-yard line with 12:08 remaining in the fourth quarter. A conversion was possible but a touchdown would wreck Cincinnati's chances for a comeback, expanding into an 11-point deficit. A field goal was manageable, keeping the Bills within striking distance of a single possession. The Buffalo Bills call a running back screen over the middle to Jackson. As the running back tried stretching to the left, Morgan Trent forced him back up the middle and tackled Jackson from behind with a little help from Rey Maualuga.
"We knew as a defense that we wanted to be big. We knew their offense was very good, and this was a test for us. We wanted to come out and give it everything we had. We wanted to prove that we are a legit defense. We let some big plays get through, but overall I think we did a good job."
Yes, you'd be right. This is the first time we mentioned Morgan Trent since preseason.
The concession for a field goal over the elation of a touchdown was huge. Most offensive possessions that accumulate 15 snaps or more tend to end only when touchdowns are scored. One could argue that a 17-play drive isn't productive of a top-ranked defense whereas someone else could easily point out that's exactly what a top-ranked defense would do; preventing the touchdown.
With 2:07 remaining in the fourth quarter, Ryan Fitzpatrick walked to his center and shouted instructions with five wide receivers stretched along the line of scrimmage. Five yards were needed for a first down. As Fitzpatrick dropped into his fifth step, defensive end Carlos Dunlap turned the corner forcing the quarterback to step up into the pocket.
Jonathan Fanene penetrated just enough to force Fitzpatrick to reassess his sudden predicament. Scramble on third-and-five for positive yards and a prayer of picking up the first down? Or throw the football and hope someone makes a play to sustain the drive that could win the game during a 20-point tie and two minutes remaining? Truth is Fitzpatrick was forced into the decision with Atkins flashing (not that flashing) into the quarterback's peripheral vision. And just as Atkins laid out the quarterback, Fitzpatrick threw a prayer down the left sidelines that fell incomplete. Brian Leonard does a Chuck Norris on the Bills and the Bengals win.
In the end... Comparing this defense to any defense in the league isn't an objective that's worth debating. Because here's what we know. They can rush the passer, force three-and-out possessions and hold some of the league's top running backs like Peyton Hillis, Frank Gore and Fred Jackson to well under 100 yards. There's no hidden meaning, no arguments to fuel an anti Mike Brown passion and nothing more than good ol' fashioned defensive football.
46 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It's all because Rey Rey plays the middle now.
No more Dhani ( ten yards past line of scrimmage tackler ) Jones
true
He was a good “in space” tackler, but was not a hard hitter at the line of scrimmage
by ticalcaldwell on Oct 3, 2011 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions
for all his faults
let’s remember Dhani never played middle before he came here, so he was never a true middle linebacker, and considering…he did a pretty damn good job.
Was waiting for this article
Think about this stat….All 4 AFC North teams are in the top ten…..wow….REY REY had a few great stops yesterday…love it….NUMBER 1 D….Let me sit back and enjoy this for the week…..May be the last time I see it for a long time……WHODEY
Nothing serious
If anything, we’re getting healthier.
Managing Editor at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Josh Kirkendall on Oct 3, 2011 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions
Sacks
While I wish the ranking was higher, it is good to see they are in the top half of the league in getting to the Quarterback. Also love to see them being in the top five in forced fumbles.
by Cedric Benson Boat Party on Oct 3, 2011 3:23 PM EDT reply actions
Zimm has them going
i take my hat off to the defense and Zimm. The passed the test they needed too. Its still alot of season left but we had a good first quater of football so far. Three more to go. I believe that the Bengals will get better as the season moves along. But they should be proud cause noone would think they would be 2-2 at this point and second in the division. WHO DEY!!!!!!
Pressure > Sacks
I think most will agree we have a really good front 7 and were worried about the secondary. I think the sacks are great but the pressure is the real key. With pressure on the QB I think it hides some of the weaknesses, which is what teams like the steelers have done for years. As for rankings, I think the only one that matters is points allowed and as long as we can keep the other team to under 20 we always have a chance.
The defensive front have brought it.........
I like the LB play as well. We have covered backs coming out of the backfield so much better this year. Lawson and Howard can run with those guys, which in the past have killed us for big plays.
by The Van Buren Boys on Oct 3, 2011 3:41 PM EDT reply actions
The Mike Zimmer Era on D
BLITZINNATI IS BACK!!!!!!! PREPARE TO BE SACKED!!!!!
the ravens and steelers prove D wins Rings…. And well you dont need that great of a QB… lucky for us we have a good QB just not experienced yet…
Lets get rid of palmer and start some extenstions….
+1
with the trading deadline looming, I just wish we could get that extra receiver for him just in case the whole Simpson debacle blows up or if nothing else, someone’s gotta have an extra o-lineman they’d be willing to part with for him…hmmm…Indy
Ints
The only thing we are really missing is int’s and I beleive they will come in bunches especially if we continue to pressure QB’s.
and manage to play with a lead
"At the very end, somebody took a dump right where I stood in the dugout every day." Dusty Baker
ESPN
No comments about he defense on NFL Prime Time
Just the 2 ref calls. They suck and the fluke plays.
Great job guys!
i was waiting for this article as well
yesterday, as I was looking at the recaps of the other games all I could think of was this:
with as well as we’re playing on D and the way his season has gone, can you imagine how good we would be if we hadn’t lost JJoe.
and just an FYI his stats don’t tell the entire story. he’s had 2 INTs and (i’m pretty sure) 2 TDs called back for penalties on his team.
RIP Slim.
why do you twist the knife
"At the very end, somebody took a dump right where I stood in the dugout every day." Dusty Baker
The cost of J-Joe
equals the cost of Howard, Lawson, and Clements.
W/ J-Joe we don’t have any of those three. So this D would actually be worse w/ J-Joe.
Change gone come mane! Trust me! Cause i Bleed tigerblood!--Jerome Simpson
+1
Great point. J-Joe is great, but what the Bengals did after losing him made the team better opposed to just a position. Had Zim written all over it. And let’s not forget Jones is coming back soon (pending a suspension). Oh, and Keith Rivers and Dontay Moch. It’s pretty amazing the defense isn’t technically at full strength and they’re doing what they’re doing.
I think JJoe leaving
is what force the bengals to sure up the rest of the D… and now look
by Bengalsfan024 on Oct 3, 2011 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions
this will be my blanket reply
don’t get me wrong, i love all of the players we’ve signed and i love how our D is doing. but we still have the money for jjoe, lawson, and howard. we wouldn’t have had to sign clements so the point is moot. i’m fine letting him go, but he’s healthy right now and has about 4 INTs if not for penalties. plus a blocked FG. our d is great, but he was the one thing we dont have right now, a playmaker.
RIP Slim.
No, they did not have the money. J-Joe costs 8 million more than Clements.
To get J-Joe, you have to trade or release Palmer. They weren’t going to do that. We can argue all day about that, but working under the assumption that Palmer was going to be on the books, they don’t have the cap room.
In fact, after Palmer and Smith’s impending 5 mil bonus, they only have 1.5 million in cap room as of today.
So no, they did not have the money to re-sign J-Joe and add Lawson, Jennings, and Howard.
J-Joe’s salary this year literally equals Lawson + Howard + Jennings + Clements. The money was not there if you assume that Carson was not getting traded or released.
Change gone come mane! Trust me! Cause i Bleed tigerblood!--Jerome Simpson
Unless you know about cap management
And realize they could have structured his contract in a cap favorable way. Also teams were allowed to go 6 mil over the cap this year and 3 mil next year per the CBA. Lastly they could have waited to extend cook saving a little more $
RIP Slim.
by brandone on Oct 4, 2011 4:32 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Thanks for telling me I don't know about cap management.
I explained it pretty well, I thought. Throw in the fact that it’s believed they offered him similar to the Texans, and Andre Johnson already had him as a Texan in June, and I think it’s really just a moot point.
I mean, sure, the Bengals could have done all of these things. But do you think they would have? Just based on the way they treated the cap this year? Based on the way they have treated the cap in the past?
Nope, nope and nope.
Change gone come mane! Trust me! Cause i Bleed tigerblood!--Jerome Simpson
And we got 2 CB's playing football every week for him!
Let him go!!!
"Men often become what they believe themselves to be. If I believe I cannot do something, it makes me incapable of doing it. But when I believe I can, I then acquire the ability to do it even if I didn't have it in the beginning."
by Dwight Carter on Oct 3, 2011 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Our D is fer real
It kills me how some are touting teams like Green Bay & New England as being all that. Uh, no…they’re the best offenses. Their defenses are crap. It would seem as if the AFC North is the only division that plays D anymore & I, for one, love it. Once our O catches up with our D, we’re gonna be a serious force.
The next 3 games are against the teams ranked 30, 31 and 32 on offense.
"Pawtucket Patriot Beer. If you drink it, hot women will have sex in your backyard."
by Evil Monkey on Oct 3, 2011 5:43 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
i just picked up the Bengals D in fantasy and am looking to trade the Ravens D
for someone who overvalues it. Good times a coming for this D!
Change gone come mane! Trust me! Cause i Bleed tigerblood!--Jerome Simpson
Me too, might get some idiot to overpay for a hot defense
Need more turnovers though.
With the kind of pressure the line has been getting the turnovers should come.
"Pawtucket Patriot Beer. If you drink it, hot women will have sex in your backyard."
Here are the defensive rankings
1. Cincinnati Bengals
2. Pittsburgh Steelers
3. Baltimore Ravens
9. Cleveland Browns
I love me some D! Who Dey! Number One!
When were we last the #1 defense in the league?
by cincyplayoffwin2012 on Oct 3, 2011 5:54 PM EDT reply actions
1983
by yards (not by points).
The Bengals have been historically abysmal on D since Paul Brown retired as head coach. With just a couple of years (2009 being one of them) where they were good. So if this keeps it up it really isn’t your father’s Bengals… more like your grandfather’s Bengals (under PB the Defense was almost always good)
by occams_tiger_teeth on Oct 3, 2011 7:31 PM EDT up reply actions
This is great.
Looks like this franchise is making the right turn (knock on wood)
by cincyplayoffwin2012 on Oct 3, 2011 8:35 PM EDT up reply actions
Just food for thought
Maybe part of the reason the teams we played were poor statistically on offense is because they played the Bengals. With only 4 games, that means a quarter of their games came against a good defense, which could slide their offensive Ranking down!
Greetings from a Buffalo Rumbler
Congratulations on a very hard fought and well played game. Your defense is most definitely for real, I have to say. The Bills were unfocused and didn’t play like they’re capable of on offense, and a large part of that is because of the pass rush you guys generated with your front 4. You stopped one of the top running backs in the league this year, especially during the second half, and made Fitzy look unsure of himself.
Yes, Fitz was off from the beginning on Sunday, but your defense made sure to take full advantage of that, and never let him recover. I have nothing but respect for the way the Bengals played on Sunday, especially on defense. We’ll bounce back, our offense is too capable and our HC too clever to let this loss dictate the rest of our season, but it did hurt. We gave up a big second half lead because your defense didn’t allow us more then 3 points, Congratulations for that, and for breaking the streak (we know how gratifying it is to do so), and good luck the rest of your year!
"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.
Nice to hear from a fan of one of the teams with a great offense
Will be pulling for the Bills the rest of the year.
Much luck & respect back to ya
I know our fanbases can relate & it’s awfully damned nice to see teams like Buffalo & Detroit emerging from the depths. Would love to see you guys stomp out the Patsies & take the East!
Bleacher Report
The bengals are now ranked 25th, the browns are ranked 20th! 1 spot above the Eagles! WTF! why are they so madly in love with the browns this year!? This is crazy
by SCbengalsfan on Oct 3, 2011 7:24 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
probably a cleveland based reporter
Oh well. I’d rather be the #1 D than #20 team on a fan site.
by cincyplayoffwin2012 on Oct 3, 2011 8:34 PM EDT up reply actions
Nice article but there is one statistic missing
QB pressures. The Bengals are in the north half of the league in sacks, but it appears the opposing QB is taking a lot of shots after releasing the ball. I would be interested in knowing where the Bengals rank in QB pressures. You have rarely seen a good pocket by the opposing team this year. It is always being collapsed on one side or the other.
Also, if I remember correctly the Bengals were in the top 5 in sacks prior to playing the Bills. Fitz does not take sacks and had only been sacked once coming into the game. The Bengals got him once and put him down a lot.

by 


























