Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The MMA Hour Is Back

The Monday Touchdown: 4 Wins in a Row Gives the Bengals a 5-2 Record Heading Into Week 8

SEATTLE - OCTOBER 30:  Quarterback Andy Dalton #14 of the Cincinnati Bengals throws a pass against the Seattle Seahawks on October 30, 2011 at Century Link Field in Seattle, Washington.  (Photo by Jonathan Ferrey/Getty Images)

The Bengals went all the way out to Seattle to play the Seahawks coming off of their Week 7 bye and, based on the team's history under Marvin Lewis, the odds were stacked against them. Their record in the weeks following their bye under Marvin Lewis was 2-5-1. Their record on the West Coast under Lewis was 1-5 (1-7 if you count Denver) and they hadn't won in Seattle since 1994. 

This was a game many were worried about and with good reason.

However, for the fourth week in a row, the Bengals emerged victorious and continue to keep pace with the Steelers and Ravens in the AFC North. Here are the seven biggest things I noticed from the Bengals Week 8 win over the Seahawks.

Point 1: We Can Partly Thank Pete Carroll

Star-divide

In my opinion, Carroll made two mistakes during game and the first mistake was who started at quarterback. Even though Tarvaris Jackson practiced fully on Friday and warmed up with the team before the game, Carroll opted to go with Charlie Whitehurst instead. After the Bengals beat up on Whitehurst and jumped out to a sizable lead, Carroll decided to put Jackson in. Jackson played much better and helped the Seahawks move the ball down the field. If he had been in the whole game, the score would have probably been much closer. If Jackson was healthy enough to come in the game at some point, why not start him?

Another reason we should have thanked him was at the end of the first half. The Seahawks had the ball in a fourth-and-two situation on the Bengals' three-yard line. Instead of getting the three guaranteed points, Carroll decided to go for it and try for the touchdown. Marshawn Lynch came close but didn't make it and time ran out. The Seahawks got nothing.

So, thanks Carroll.

Point 2: What's the Point of Cedric Peerman Being on the Team?

If there was a game in which I figured Cedric Peerman would play, it would have been this one. With Cedric Benson's suspension, you would think that Peerman would get a few carries even if those carries were just to give Bernard Scott a break. Peerman didn't even make an appearance. Scott carried the ball 22 times, Leonard carried it twice and even Andrew Hawkins carried the ball once, but Peerman never touched it. 

Why is he on the roster?

It makes me wonder if he'll be cut when the Bengals' two-game exemption for Benson is over.

Point 3: A.J. Green Passes Calvin Johnson's Rookie Touchdown Total

Calvin Johnson, who is arguably the best wide receiver in the NFL, has had a freakishly awesome season so far. He has 11 touchdowns so far this season and he's already racked up 11 touchdowns and over 800 yards. A.J. Green isn't to that point yet but with his performance in the Bengals game on Sunday (four catches for 63 yards and a touchdown), Green surpassed Johnson's rookie stats. 

As a rookie, Johnson only caught four touchdown passes and had 756 total receiving yards. I don't think there's any question that Green will have the better rookie season between the two wide receivers.

Maybe there was a reason scouts said that Green was the best wide receiver to come out of the draft since Johnson.

Point 4: Having Lynch Didn't Help Much

Having Marshawn Lynch back in the lineup seemed to be a big deal to the Seahawks. When we talked to Joseph Okabe from 12ManRising.com on our podcast last week, he told us that he felt the Seahawks could win if both Jackson and Lynch played against the Bengals.

However, Seahawks fans and Marshawn Lynch got introduced the Bengals front seven, who held Lynch to 24 yards on 16 carries. That's an average of 1.5 yards per carry and hardly anything to write home about. 

Point 5: Bernard Scott Can, and Should, Do More

Against the Colts the Bengals coaches decided to give the team's top-two running backs, Benson and Bernard Scott, almost an equal amount of carries. Benson got 16 and Scott got 11.

Bernard Scott carried the ball 22 times for 76 yards against a very tough Seahawks running defense. Jay Gruden did what he could to get Scott around the edge and get him the ball in space so he could make a play or two and even though the Bengals didn't score a touchdown on the ground in Week 8, Scott looked pretty good.

From this point on, I hope that Scott and Benson split carries right down the middle. Also it would be nice to see Scott more involved in the passing game.

Point 6: LOUD NOISES!

I knew that Seahawks fans had a reputation for being loud, but holy crap it was loud. When the TV announcers are getting somewhat drowned out by the sound of the crowd yelling, you know it's loud. 

It must have been almost deafening on the field.

Extra Point: Bengals Could Take Advantage of Flex Scheduling 

Flex scheduling doesn't start until Week 11, according to the NFL's flex scheduling rules. In Week 11 the Bengals play the Ravens and then they play the Steelers in Week 13. If the Bengals win in Tennessee and then they win their first game against the Steelers, it is likely that the NFL could flex the Bengals to a Sunday night game in their second game against the Steelers or the Ravens. 

Who would have thought that the Bengals would even have a chance to play in a primetime game in 2011? 

Comment 69 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Bernard Scott Can, and Should, Do Less

Benson Can, and Should, Do More!

How about 35 carries FOR Ced this week, the O-line is better with running off tackles.
Why must i repeat this every game or two.

Reggie Nelson should get the game ball!

by Echmbst on Oct 31, 2011 9:09 PM EDT reply actions  

because ced still gets the same 3.some ypc every game.

Ced has his place on this team, and he does what he needs, but Scott has a place and needs to be used in it. Give Scott 10 or 15 carrys/catches a game using his speed. Give Benson 20 carrys to grind clock and wear out the defense.

by JCompton41 on Oct 31, 2011 9:37 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

he had one game above 3.8 vs the bills

And had one game of 2.2 vs the jags. The others were around 3.6. I’m not saying he’s bad, but he’s not great.

by JCompton41 on Nov 1, 2011 12:37 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Who ced great

We made Obama president hes not great he’s lazy

by Echmbst on Nov 1, 2011 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Really

I dont read Cincy jungle for its political stance… Or the political stance of others, just to read about the bengals… Keep you political rhetoric to yourself

by Toasted_Orange_Monster on Nov 1, 2011 2:34 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I care

Theres a lot of people hurting in Ohio.
We need more results from our politicians.
And we need to support our team by going to the games if we can.

by Echmbst on Nov 1, 2011 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Its fact

Please stop being emotional (gay)

You should be able to relate to an example of someone not being great
being a political comment is just your interpretation not fact

by Echmbst on Nov 1, 2011 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

i will repeat

You should be able to relate to an example of someone not being great
 being a political comment is just your interpretation not fact

by Echmbst on Nov 1, 2011 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Scott can run off tackles

I seen a few off tackles run where it look like Scott had no place to go and made something out of it. i believe Scott gets to the whole quicker then Ced. Scott proved that he can carry the ball 20 times. The Seahawks run deffens is one of the best in the NFL. Scott dnt have the power Ced has but he reads better then Ced do and is quicker to the point of attack then Ced is. Scott will break a long run before Ced will. So give Scott a chance.

by i am will on Oct 31, 2011 9:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

He didnt break 80

and it looked like he dropped at first contact

by Echmbst on Oct 31, 2011 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Against the #1 run defense

I like Ced, but your man-crush is amazing.

by Oregonbengalsfan on Nov 1, 2011 2:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

35

Ced is going to prove to all you skeptical vacuous fans
Marvin give Ced 35 carries and we win the upcoming games

by Echmbst on Nov 1, 2011 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Vacuous

vac·u·ous/ˈvakyo͞oəs/
Adjective:
1. Having or showing a lack of thought or intelligence; mindless: “a vacuous smile”.
2. Empty.

Know the definition of a word before using it.

Your vacuous (mindless) obsession with Cedric Benson is getting old.

by Oregonbengalsfan on Nov 1, 2011 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why are being infantile?

Like all the Cedric whiners your wrong and should watch the games

by Echmbst on Nov 1, 2011 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Its sad

Sometimes you are objective and give thoughtful comments.

by Echmbst on Nov 1, 2011 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's the thing

You haven’t said anything objective or thoughtful. It’s all Ced, Ced, Ced. I have mentioned before that I have been a big supporter of Ced on here, but I at least did some research and showed stats etc to back up my claims. And I didn’t just repeat the same thing over and over and over and over.

by Oregonbengalsfan on Nov 1, 2011 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Objective time

You have no research on this page
But please reply with the number of fumbles Ced has.

by Echmbst on Nov 1, 2011 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

When were fumbles even brought into the conversation?

And you want to see my research go to the threads where I was defending Ced. I’m waiting for your research…

And Ced’s lack of fumbles (except for last year) were one of my big points in said defense.

by Oregonbengalsfan on Nov 1, 2011 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Infantile

in·fan·tile/ˈinfənˌtīl/
Adjective:
Childish; immature

Calling someone vacuous and infantile, is in itself, quite infantile.

I don’t miss a single game.

by Oregonbengalsfan on Nov 1, 2011 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

its ok

Admit he didn’t break 80 and it looked like he dropped at first contact

by Echmbst on Nov 1, 2011 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

I never said he didn't break 80

I’d look like a fool trying to say he did since he didn’t. And Benson has been looking like he drops at first contact also. So…

by Oregonbengalsfan on Nov 1, 2011 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

At least he can make people miss

Benson tries to go through them and rarely does.

by Oregonbengalsfan on Nov 1, 2011 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

First play of season for the offense

He broke a tackle, so please stop whining

by Echmbst on Nov 1, 2011 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

LOL 1 tackle?

and who’s whining Mr “Give Ced the ball”

Starting to sound like “LEAVE BRITNEY CEDRIC ALOOOOOONE!!!” :’(

by Oregonbengalsfan on Nov 1, 2011 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh wow

so now I’m gay… is that happy gay or homosexual gay? Wow you are classy.

by Oregonbengalsfan on Nov 1, 2011 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

please be positive

we don’t want to know if your happy or a pitcher or catcher
this is football not ESPN

by Echmbst on Nov 1, 2011 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Please be positive...

come on… You want to go start calling people names then want to try and say someone else isn’t being positive. Dude, you are a class act. Come back with something more than “I love Ced so he should carry the ball”.

by Oregonbengalsfan on Nov 1, 2011 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

wait

My comments are about point 5

The team is facing a tough stretch and we will lose games if Ced doesn’t get 25 touches. You can’t argue fact

Can you agree with that?

by Echmbst on Nov 1, 2011 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes I can argue that

Let’s see, he got 19 carries against the Bills, we won that game. Only 24 against the Jags, won that one. Only 16 against the Colts, won that one.

by Oregonbengalsfan on Nov 1, 2011 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Correction

Calling someone vacuous and infantile without cause, is in itself, quite infantile.

by Oregonbengalsfan on Nov 1, 2011 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

when Benson has 25-plus carries ...

Scott ‘s running style isn’t this team.
Marvin is holding Ced back
Cedric historically
Bengals bears 37 carries 189 yards
Bengals Ravens 34 carries 117 yards
Bengals Lions 36 carries 110 yards
Bengals Chiefs 29 carries 133 yards
All are wins, the only stat that is announced every telecast is that
when Benson has 25-plus carries ..

by Echmbst on Nov 1, 2011 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wow

Dude doesn’t let up … He must have been Ceds side dish in college… Ced is a great RB but has yet to show his potential this year other than the big play against Cleveland he hasn’t shown much burst and I have noticed that he seems to trip on his own feet and when there is little to minimum contact he seems to drop like a brick

by Toasted_Orange_Monster on Nov 1, 2011 2:39 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Ding Ding Ding a new whiner

Which game did he drop like a brick?

by Echmbst on Nov 1, 2011 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hahaha

I think if you read through anything I’ve posted I’m a ced supporter. And as for a whiner, the only time I’ve whined is to my wife for not enough bj’s. I do think ced might be showing us his age, he’s taken a beating being our full time back and I think this year we haven’t been able utilize him the way we want or need to. But cut back the whining talk and realize that being on this website you’ll see real whiners just not me or the other guy you called a whiner. It’s opinions and opinions that are back by facts or personal views. That what a blog site is, so go to another site if you can’t take people voicing thier opinions.

by Toasted_Orange_Monster on Nov 1, 2011 4:07 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

ok

if he doesn’t get the carries you can’t prove hes old

today your whining admit your wrong or don’t

by Echmbst on Nov 1, 2011 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

They weren't #1 in yards per game.

Which is generally how teams are ranked. I forget where they were placed, but it was top ten.
But they were (and still are) ranked #1 for yards per carry, which, arguably, is the better indicator. It was a tough matchup for Scott, and he did pretty well.

by Aether on Nov 1, 2011 4:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

"ranked #1 for yards per carry"

That was the stat. I thought it was #1 in something. But yes Scott did well and Benson, I think, would have been hard pressed to do better against that run D. I think they should have given Peerman a shot, let him run up the gut like Benson to wear down the D.

by Oregonbengalsfan on Nov 1, 2011 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Cedric Peerman

I wouldve liked to see him get some carries, but he made another special teams tackle Sunday. He’s a really good special team player, plays really hard.

by JDT1418 on Oct 31, 2011 10:09 PM EDT reply actions  

Cedric Peerman is on the team because he is the only guy worth crap on the kick coverage team

He had another nice hit Sunday.

Peerman is the man. When Chuck Norris wants to know how to hit someone on a football field, he calls Cedric Peerman.

by BeerRun on Oct 31, 2011 10:36 PM EDT reply actions  

I might be wrong...

but in regards to the flex schedule….Aren’t networks allowed to move a 1 PM game to 4pm? I’m fairly sure this has happened before in the past.

by KSE on Oct 31, 2011 10:47 PM EDT reply actions  

Scott should get more carries

+1 to that. He is the kind of runner that needs consistency game to game in order to get a rhythm; his run style is more “art” or “finesse” than Benson’s. Its like a 3pt specialist in the NBA. You HAVE to give them court time to warm up their shot and get comfortable. Scott opened it up in the 4th when the line nutted up and gave him some good blocks and he had some freedom to do his thing.

"We never tried Amar'e, Nash, and a live Grizzly bear." -Scott Howard, January 18, 2010
"All they’re fighting for is to stay as obscenely rich as they are now, based on their ability to bounce a ball and throw it in a hole." East Bay Ray, October 10, 2011

by N8lol on Nov 1, 2011 12:50 AM EDT reply actions  

1. Pete looked like Marvin last year

2.Must be ball security issues?

3.Better than Chad Whoever in every way!

4.If our line continues to play this way every game and we don’t give up any more 400 yard passing games, they will be comparing us to the 85 bears.

5.20 good carries is about all B .Scott has in him per game. Ced moves the pile and can carry 30+ plus.

6.What did you say? Huh? Huh?

E.P. If they do, I hope A.D. doesn’t overthrow all his passes on the first two series.

by keithster on Nov 1, 2011 12:53 AM EDT reply actions  

peerman=

great specials team play… i say keep for now….and im sure morgan trent wont get cut bcuz pacman is injury prone…. unless ced ups his production or goes beast mode in the playoffs and helps us win it all, i want to see someone new next year….maybe pead might drop to the 4th rd for us? on another note oakland is looking at ex bengal t.j…..

by JulianK on Nov 1, 2011 2:39 AM EDT reply actions  

Oregon and toasted and others

when Ced gets 30 plus carries and bad yards and they lose,
I will stop posting you guys don’t know football

Till then stop whining, Ced is doing the job…. ZERO fumbles

by Echmbst on Nov 1, 2011 4:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Cincinnati Bengals.

Editor-In Chief

Cj_small Josh Kirkendall

Editor/Managing Editor

Rudiblanket_small Anthony Cosenza

5255_133614603784_666578784_2414703_1976100_n_small Jason Garrison

Authors

Photo_3_small BeerRun

010511170110_small Joe Goodberry

40297_422933299865_509514865_4658259_6466915_n_small Ryan Harper

Small Brennen Warner

Sb_nation_small Jack Cassidy

580551_10150822857707018_613867017_11694254_1239726425_n_small Nick_Crago

Img_0783_small Mike Fightmaster

Moderators

Nfl palewook

680764146_0eac16fabd_small 80%OFTHETIMEIMRIGHTEVERYTIME

Tawky_tawny_small UpStateMike

Joeb698_86e260_small joeb69

Bengals_stamp_by_jamaal10_small Doc Scratch