Bernard Scott Against The Steelers Highlights Growing Production This Year
Since joining the Cincinnati Bengals following the sixth round of the 2009 NFL draft, the label attached to running back Bernard Scott has always been one of "durability." Words like explosive and elusive are nothing compared to the durability perception that's followed Scott like a little duckling following mother. When there was a belief that Scott could one day become the team's feature back, that belief was planted into reality when Scott covered for an injured Cedric Benson during the 2009 season. And Scott produced, posting 206 yards rushing on 39 carries in consecutive games. Unfortunately Scott missed three straight afterwards due to an injury, only reinforcing that "durability" label.
That being said, we're not exactly sure how warranted the label is anymore. Since returning during Cincinnati's week 16 win over the Kansas City Chiefs in 2009, Scott has played every game since -- a streak of 28 straight, including Cincinnati's wild card loss to the New York Jets.
Unfortunately Scott's sporadic playing time this season hasn't offered the running back an opportunity to find his rhythm; somewhat critical for a running back to really produce. Heading into Sunday's game against the Pittsburgh Steelers, Scott's 3.2 yard/rush average was significantly lower than his career 4.6 yard/rush average before the 2011 season. In fact his career average dropped 0.4 yards/rush due to the season he's having this year.
But it's improving.
During a three-game stretch since his first start this year against the Seattle Seahawks, Scott posted 138 yards rushing on 35 carries for a 3.9 yards/rush average. And during his final two games against the Titans and Steelers, Scott is averaging a more Scott-like 4.8 yards per carry.
The team's backup running back came into the game during Cincinnati's third possession, following consecutive three and out possessions. With 1:41 remaining in the first quarter, Scott takes the handoff out of shotgun and sheds off a James Harrison tackle. The running back finds a lane developing between Bobbie Williams and Andre Smith, with A.J. Green neutralizing cornerback Ike Taylor, exploding through, while shedding a Ryan Clark attempted tackle, for an 11-yard gain. Two plays later Andy Dalton connected with wide receiver A.J. Green on a 36-yard touchdown reception (that you've probably seen already).
Unfortunately Scott wouldn't get another chance to run the football until 10:38 remained in the fourth quarter.
With 10:38 remaining in the game and a seven-point deficit, Scott followed the blocks of Andre Smith, Bobbie Williams and the right side of the offensive line when a cutback lane developed between Nate Livings and Andrew Whitworth. Steelers defensive end Brett Keisel was the first defensive player to hit Scott, who had already picked up seven yards on the play, picking up two more on the tackle. Scott picked up the first down on a cutback behind Kyle Cook that gave the running back six yards.
At one point in the fourth quarter, Scott was the team's leading rusher until late in the game when Benson found his rhythm. Both running backs combined to record 44 yards rushing on six carries during the game's final quarter.
Scott's 38 yards rushing against the Steelers gave the running back a season-high 5.4 yard/rush average against one of the better defenses in the NFL.
26 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It's all about changing the pace with Scott
Great use of him yesterday (also given Leonard being absent). Came in at the right moment and gave the offense something different.
by wiseking on Nov 14, 2011 1:21 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Leonard was in
but he seemed to be used most on pass blocking. He did have 2 carries.
by Oregonbengalsfan on Nov 14, 2011 1:40 PM EST up reply actions
The quicker we get a lead in a game
the more we will see of Scott, it seems like they like to use scott in the second qtr and some in the 4th to rest Ced.
AMAS
I would like
To see Scott get half of the carries. We need a bigger sample size to see what he is really capable of. I really like what I see when he runs.
by Helmsy on Nov 14, 2011 2:00 PM EST via iPhone app reply actions
Yesterday
I felt that when Scott was in the game we were moving the ball effectively. I felt as if Marvin and Jay were trying to keep Ced happy by giving him the ball. Aside from that 17 yard run, I wasn’t impressed with Ced. Scott needs more touches.
by sgiridharan1982 on Nov 14, 2011 3:10 PM EST reply actions
When I was watching the game
I was wondering why Scott wasn’t getting more carries. He seemed to be tearing it up when he got the ball. Any insight as to why he’s used so little?
This message will self destruct
GIMME FOOD GIMME FRIES GIMME SAMMICH ON THE SIDE - James Hetfield
We've wondered the same thing at times
Granted he had his best performance this year against the Steelers (7 carries, 38yds, 5.4ypc) but his body of work is so small we can’t really tell how good he would do (although he looked great Sunday). Against Seattle, when Benson was suspended, was his first game as the #1 back (22 carries, 76yds, 3.5ypc) but that was also against one of the best run defenses in the league.
I think we are all of the mind (besides Echmbst, who is Ced’s biggest advocate on this site; and I just now noticed that he was apparently banned from here and has taken his rants to BTSC) that Scott needs to get more carries, but we are also aware that he probably can’t be an every down (or bell cow) back. I’m personally starting to think we should run with Scott and Leonard (Leonard is our 3rd down specialist back who didn’t see but 2 carries against Pitt, probably due to a knee injury suffered last week). Too many times, at least to me, it seems that Benson waits to perform “better” until another back shows him up. And I’ve been a big supporter and fan of Benson in the past, so that says something.
by Oregonbengalsfan on Nov 14, 2011 3:42 PM EST up reply actions
So basically, people feel about Scott
the same way so many BTSC’ers feel about Isaac Redman.
All I know is watching the game, I kept thinking “who the fudge is this guy” I’m actually surprised to find out he only had 38 yards. He just seemed to find the gap pretty well.
And yes, Echmbst has came to BTSC, and he made us aware of the ban, lol
This message will self destruct
GIMME FOOD GIMME FRIES GIMME SAMMICH ON THE SIDE - James Hetfield
Not sure
Maybe his repeated “your gay” to several people. I just found out about it because I saw his comment on BTSC.
by Oregonbengalsfan on Nov 14, 2011 4:17 PM EST up reply actions
how do you do that thing
where you type something, and it turns out to be a link?
This message will self destruct
GIMME FOOD GIMME FRIES GIMME SAMMICH ON THE SIDE - James Hetfield
When you click the reply button
it shows a few formatting options between the subject box and the body box. Click on the chainlink icon and you past the url into the dialogue box that opens up.
by Oregonbengalsfan on Nov 14, 2011 4:32 PM EST up reply actions
thank you thank you
This message will self destruct
GIMME FOOD GIMME FRIES GIMME SAMMICH ON THE SIDE - James Hetfield
optionally,
if you want to have it look like this link back to the steeler site, you can type in a formatted link:
<a href=“http://www.behindthesteelcurtain.com” target=“_blank”>link back to the steeler site</a>
Broken down:
<a href=“URL” target=“_blank”>TEXT</a>
where URL is replaced by the url to the site you want and TEXT is replaced by the text you want to serve as the link.
the target=“_blank” forces the link to open in a new window.
You could do target=“_new” as well.
OR… target=“_mytarget” and that opens a new window OR reuses the window if you have multiple links that use target=“_mytarget”
by supergrover on Nov 15, 2011 10:44 AM EST up reply actions
Much easier to just use the chain link icon
it adds all of that and lets you check a box to open in a new tab. Not everyone is versed in HTML. :)
by Oregonbengalsfan on Nov 15, 2011 12:26 PM EST up reply actions
Yes, I'm certainly not
but thank you supergrover
This message will self destruct
GIMME FOOD GIMME FRIES GIMME SAMMICH ON THE SIDE - James Hetfield
Oh and be aware Echmbst is a 14 yr old kid
so expect responses in kind.
by Oregonbengalsfan on Nov 14, 2011 3:51 PM EST up reply actions
what do you mean?
why did you feel you needed to warn me about that? if you don’t mind me asking
This message will self destruct
GIMME FOOD GIMME FRIES GIMME SAMMICH ON THE SIDE - James Hetfield
the problem is
The Bengals just aren’t getting enough downs to test out multiple backs and distribute the ball to our talented corp of receivers. Drives need to last longer than just 4 or 5 plays if we want an adequate sample of Benson vs Scott vs Leonard. On top of that, many of the third downs have been third and long; forcing pass plays.

by 
























