Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Eden Hazard In London For Medical, According To Reports

Pernell McPhee: Bengals Offense Tipping Off The Snap Count

JACKSONVILLE, FL - OCTOBER 09:  Center Kyle Cook #64 of the Cincinnati Bengals calls out blocking assignments against the Jacksonville Jaguars during play at EverBank Field on October 9, 2011 in Jacksonville, Florida.  (Photo by Grant Halverson/Getty Images)

There are aspects to Andy Dalton's game you could file under "he's a rookie." Such as the long-bomb at the end of the first half that Ed Reed picked off when the team was threatening for, at the very least, a field goal to reduce Cincinnati's seven-point deficit to four. Or not calling an audible to get out of Jay Gruden's decision to actually run an option against the Baltimore Ravens on Sunday. Another we could file under is Dalton developing tendencies that's tipped the Baltimore Ravens off, especially late in the game when the defensive line got a good release off the snap.

Star-divide

McPhee said he noticed by studying game tape that Dalton had a tendency to let the play clock wind down to five seconds before tapping center Kyle Cook's hip. Then, Dalton would look to his left and take the snap.

"I got a good get-off," McPhee said. "I just knew they would snap it every time after he tapped the center's hip. I was paying attention to that. I timed it up pretty good, 100 miles per hour."

Truth be told, we're not exactly sure if he means Dalton or Cook. For one thing Dalton was entirely in shotgun during Cincinnati's final possession. We do know that once Nate Livings taps Cook's leg, Cook snaps his head left and before snapping the football as a means to help the offensive line get a better jump off the ball, especially during away games where the crowd tends to be loud.

So we fired up NFL.com's excellent Game Rewind service to review Pernell McPhee sack on Dalton that ended Cincinnati's comeback on Sunday. Fourth and goal from the Ravens 17-yard line with 33 seconds remaining in the game. Dalton stands roughly five yards behind Kyle Cook in shotgun, lifting his right leg telling Kyle Cook he's ready for the snap. Dalton momentarily looks left (as he does to the right), but most quarterbacks scan the field to accumulate information on what the opposing defense is bringing.

Regardless McPhee is seeing something. And if he's seeing a player's head snap to the left before the snap as a means to time the cadence, then we're fairly confidence it's Kyle Cook, not Andy Dalton.

Comment 18 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Yes...that's a problem...

…the Steelers did that too. Just watch the snap clock and time your charge. The Bengals need to do some quick snaps early in the game to keep teams off balance.

by goffchile on Nov 21, 2011 11:43 AM EST reply actions  

I've definitely noticed Livings/Cook doing this

Always thought it was odd, but not exactly sure a defense could get a jump off of it.

by eric nyc on Nov 21, 2011 11:46 AM EST reply actions  

Next time they should do that move

but snap two beats later.
I noticed Livings, not Dalton. So I’m not sure what they mean.

by occams_tiger_teeth on Nov 21, 2011 11:58 AM EST reply actions  

Please do NOT let Dan Deirdorf coerse you into to beleiving that option play was a bad decision made by a rookie QB and a Rookie OC

It was there!! It was just porrly executued. If Andy and and baby hawk would have had there spacing right that play may have very well have gone for 6

by biggie22 on Nov 21, 2011 11:58 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

It was there..........

it caught the Ravens completely off guard. I wouldn’t recommend turning Dalton into Tebow or anything, but it was there. If he could have gotten the pitch to Hawkins, it would have been for a nice gain. I don’t know about everybody else, but I was getting tired of the fake quick pass, draw handoff to Benson……..for 1 yard each time. We must have done that 10 times, for practically nothing.

by The Van Buren Boys on Nov 21, 2011 12:07 PM EST up reply actions  

I think that's the point though

Yeah, it “was there” but it’s a gimmick play, so you obviously don’t have that much experience running it. I’m sure they ran it a few times in practice, but it’s SUCH a departure from the offense that they’ve installed that it’s no surprise at all it blew up on a mis-timing. I couldn’t see the rest of the field, but I’d imagine on the blown pitch back from Scott to Dalton that Caldwell or Simpson were wide open down the field, but it doesn’t matter because you’ve got a guy trying to do something that he basically never does and that’s usually when mistakes happen. I don’t know if a critical division game is the time to be spit-balling. Then again, I guess you could make the argument that a division game is EXACTLY the time to be spit-balling…

by eric nyc on Nov 21, 2011 12:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Steelers

They love to “spitball” in division games.

by MrMcLargeHuge on Nov 21, 2011 12:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I think it's good to throw a new "wrinkle" in there.......but maybe keep it to that, just one instead of

multiple trick plays. The option by itself would’ve been a great play to keep in our pocket until we had a key 3rd down for example. Do a few more reps and really prep it instead of trying to add in 3-4 plays like this. Then mistakes can and most likely will happen……

by The Van Buren Boys on Nov 21, 2011 12:44 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't listen to the broadcast...

So I don’t know what Deirdorf said. Running an option in the NFL hasn’t worked since I was born into this world. I love this offense, but we’re not good enough to dig into the bag of tricks and two of those plays cost us precious downs — and nearly two turnovers.

Managing Editor at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.

by Josh Kirkendall on Nov 21, 2011 12:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Sorry to insinuate you were listening to D.D.

Be glad you were not b/c he was pissing me off the entire broadcast. Having said that, I think it’s nice to throw a wrinkle in every once in a while and if you look at the film the play was open. I’m not saying for us to turn into an option team b/c obviously that’s not what this team is built for but opening up the play book every once in while in my opinion is not a bad thing. Unfortunately the two times they tried this game the execution was not there but that does not mean the play was not there and I hope this does not discourage them from doing more in the future. You know the old sane if it works it’s genius if not it was stupid. Again not all the time but I do like to see a wrinkle thown in every once in while

by biggie22 on Nov 21, 2011 1:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah Dalton looked back to gauge where Hawkins was

He just failed to gauge how much closer Hawkins would be after he stopped and attempted a juke. I agree, if it had been executed properly, first down +

by Oregonbengalsfan on Nov 21, 2011 2:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Put it this way

The top brass at CBS need to put some effort into getting some impartiality into the summarisers. Dierdorf’s a lost cause. It was clear he didn’t know one Bengals player from the next.

As for their director, he spent more time watching Ray Lewis on the sidelines. First rule of direction, focus on the action.

by wiseking on Nov 21, 2011 1:42 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

You didn’t enjoy hearing “Haw haw haw. He looks like he’s ready to be in the game! Haw haw haw” every drive?

by supergrover on Nov 21, 2011 2:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Dan the Man!

Dierdorf

Empty vessels make more noise
Dan should know!

by wiseking on Nov 21, 2011 3:03 PM EST up reply actions  

A lot of plays don't work that are standard meat and potatos plays

Off tackle with Benson for example. At least 8 times a game it yoelds 1 or mqybe 2 yards, but we need to do it to keep the D honest. Do we need trickery? No. But lets face it, it is no different than any other play designed to keep the opp. D off balance. “Trick” plays do the same thing and as long as they are used sparingly enough as to not be predictable I don’t see any reason not to do it. As long as you are prudent and practice it enough to execute it. Besides it is fun. That is one of the strengths of this team. Did you see Dalton on the side line smiling and high fiving guys – patting them on the back aqnd keeping everyone’s spirits up? He was having fun and there is something to be said for that. Getting too serious tightens everyone up. Having fun loosens everyone up and loose is good as long as you are still professional. I promote that atmosphere in my own business.
It is serious work but the best work is done in an atmosphere of good fun combined with serious hard work. The pass by Scott and the option play by Dalton were fun and both could have been successful if they were executed properly. If that option went for 6 everyone would be talking about how cool it was. We need to lighten up. This is supposed to be fun.

"If we always agree, one of us is not necessary"

by JUNGLEJOHN on Nov 21, 2011 1:09 PM EST reply actions  

I Liked The Call !!!!

Work it into the portfolio.

Earn Your Stripes !

by Loyal2aFault on Nov 21, 2011 1:11 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Cincinnati Bengals.

Editor-In Chief

Cj_small Josh Kirkendall

Editor/Managing Editor

Rudiblanket_small Anthony Cosenza

5255_133614603784_666578784_2414703_1976100_n_small Jason Garrison

Authors

Photo_3_small BeerRun

010511170110_small Joe Goodberry

40297_422933299865_509514865_4658259_6466915_n_small Ryan Harper

Small Brennen Warner

Sb_nation_small Jack Cassidy

580551_10150822857707018_613867017_11694254_1239726425_n_small Nick_Crago

Img_0783_small Mike Fightmaster

Moderators

Nfl palewook

680764146_0eac16fabd_small 80%OFTHETIMEIMRIGHTEVERYTIME

Tawky_tawny_small UpStateMike

Joeb698_86e260_small joeb69

Bengals_stamp_by_jamaal10_small Doc Scratch