Cedric Benson Needs To Become A Greater Factor For Cincinnati's Playoff Push
During his second season with the Bengals in 2009, Benson generated a career-high 1,251 yards rushing on 301 carries, averaging 96.2 yards/game which ranked second to Chris Johnson, who rushed for over 2,000 yards that season. Largely the result of differing factors, such as a team-emphasis to run the football more along with having a natural fullback in the backfield, Benson's production wasn't just the result of his own abilities -- two other running backs posted 100-yard rushing games during that same season. Those same ideals were abandoned the following year with an itching desire to give Carson Palmer more weapons in the passing game, forcing Palmer to throw the football a career-high 586 times. Granted the Bengals were often playing from behind, but truth be told, they didn't play that far from behind to abandon the running game. Frankly the rushing offense was as effective in 2010 as it was in 2009.
Yet even though this team is working hard at a greater balance between the ground and air, the Bengals have thrown 54% of the time this season. That's lower than 2010 (56.4%), but higher than 2009 where the offense threw the football 47.2% of the time.
| Cedric Benson through nine games the last three seasons | ||||
| ATT. | YDS. | AVG. | TDS | |
| 2011 | 167 | 634 | 3.8 | 4 |
| 2010 | 175 | 623 | 3.6 | 3 |
| 2009 | 205 | 859 | 4.2 | 6 |
Even so the Bengals rushing offense continues seeing eight-man fronts with Benson saying, if he had more room on the line of scrimmage with less defenders, "It would be a field day, all day."
But since his 39-yard run against the Cleveland Browns during the regular season opener, Benson has posted one run greater than 16 yards once.
"We don’t do what we did in the past to be put in those situations more than once or a couple times in a game," Benson said. "As a result of that, you are going to get lesser long runs."
Now the Rapid Reports posting cites the team's offensive scheme for limiting his long runs this year. Truth is we're not exactly sure what Benson means, other than the team's struggles in the second quarter where the team is barely averaging more than a field goal, outscored by nearly 50 points during the season.
Regardless Benson's struggles have been persistent this year. Only surpassing 100 yards rushing twice this year, Benson has recorded a yard/rush average below four yards in half his games this season. Additionally Benson doubled his touchdowns this season after a two-touchdown performance against the Baltimore Ravens.
We maintain this much. If the Bengals are going to continue making a push to the playoffs, they will need Benson to step up in a greater role as an effective feature back.
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
15 times Benson had the pigskin.
Gruden is moving away from the gameplan.The Old Game Plan was to win time of possession, win the turnover battle, and rush Benson 25 times a game. Benson was the only guy who could make the Old Gameplan work. Is Dalton the the new kid in town. Gruden is changing for sure. Gruden is playing Dalton Ball. Big Mistake after the last two games when andy had a chance to win the game at the end. Time ran out. Like all say, get the game on early. Gruden must get BETTER. Scoring must be a 60 minute game. Benson is the timer. Who cares if Benson fails. Only the WIN LOSS COLLUMN.
Factor in scott's carries and the increase of playing time scott has, compared to how many carries Benson got.
Your tunnel vision is showing.
"It’s time people started realizing just how good a player Carlos Dunlap already is, and that starts with the Bengals. They gave him a season-high 58 snaps and what was the result? Carnage on the right side of the Seattle line." -Pro Football Focus
Eh- Call me crazy but-
I think Benson should be Scott’s relief.
+1
The facts are pretty clear. The team has seemed to move the ball better with Scott in, especially in recent weeks.
benson isn't suited for the WCO
He’s a lousy receiver and a sub-par blocker so when he’s in the line-up, they assume run, which makes his life difficult. And because he’s a lliability in the passing game he doesnt help dalton. Does the running game need to get better? Very much so, but let’s just say, this is bensons last year in stripes.
by goffchile on Nov 25, 2011 2:37 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Honestly if I were Gruden
If Benson doesn’t have a good drive to start the game I’d bring in Scott and switch their roles. Let Scott get 2/3 series to Benson’s 1 series.
At the very least if Benson is not performing and when Scott gets in he has a few good runs the coaching staff need to be willing to stick with the guy that is performing on that day and gives us the best chance to establish a running game. Against the Ravens Scott was the player that gave us the best run threat yet they continued going back to Benson who was regularly stopped for no gain.
Sure, Benson may be a bigger back.
But Scott brings:
-Speed
-Pass Catching
-Elusiveness
-Willingness to play
"It’s time people started realizing just how good a player Carlos Dunlap already is, and that starts with the Bengals. They gave him a season-high 58 snaps and what was the result? Carnage on the right side of the Seattle line." -Pro Football Focus
Benson is done after this season for sure
His numbers have slowly dwindled down since that magical 2009 season where he was the focal point of the offense. And now under Gruden’s system, I don’t think his style is the ideal fit to make this offense as effective as it can be. Scott is a better fit, but I don’t think he’s at the level to be a full-time starter. If he was, he would’ve already taken Ced’s job away by now.
If we can draft or sign a Darren McFadden type who is a more dynamic type RB that can run and catch equally well, yet has the big playmaking ability, that would be a huge pickup for this team. Averaging 3 yards per carry just ain’t gonna cut it for a starting tailback.
It would be beneficial to the Bengals and Benson himself if he could play at a level circa 2009 because we all know the recipe to success in the playoffs is a solid running game to open up more passing opportunities for Dalton. Yeah, there have been championship teams who have had a sub-par running game(Pts, Packers) but we don’t have the astronomical passing attack and talent that those teams had.
If we can get 85-90 rushing ypg out of Ced for the rest of the season, this team will put themselves in a better position to win games.
We Believe!!!
lamar miller--he's a playmaker and fast
by goffchile on Nov 25, 2011 6:32 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Would be ideal
I would love the Bengals to grab Bush in FA. That would help open up the draft to take BPA within a few positions of need which means that regardless of who they selected it would be BPA or within a few spots of BPA.
If they could sign Bush and a #2 WR or G then it would REALLY open up the draft to take BPA and upgrade this team.
They did pursue some RB’s last offseason and I expect they will pursue more in this offseason and probably more aggressively.
good call. I live in Raiderville so I see this guy do work ever since Run DMC went down
He would be one helluva pick up. MB: you listening??? :P
We Believe!!!
Offense is more potent
Say what you want, this Offense is more potent and has greater chance of success with Benson pounding consistently! I agree with Chili Dog. Gruden keeps changing and that tends to throw off the line blocking schemes. They know what they got with Benson running. They have no clue how to block when Scott is dancing around! With Benson pounding, then blocking, Dalton has more success.
Keep Benson in and stay away from friggin QB option and feriggin halfback optiion passes! runs! Teach Dalton how to get yardage with his feet too cause lots of time he could have run for positive yardage when his receivers were covered.
A solid simple gameplan, an we will continue to win!
I represent the Bengals of Cincinnati with extreme passion and prejudice and make no apologies for it!
Disagree
If that were the case then Bernard Scott wouldn’t have the success he’s had.
Scott has averaged over 4 ypc in 5 of 10 games and in each of the last 3 games.
Last 2 games were arguably Benson’s worst and arguably Scott’s best. If the Offensive Line’s the entire problem then there wouldn’t be as big of a discrepency in their performances. Don’t get me wrong, the line has not blocked very well but the bottom line is Benson rarely breaks a tackle, has no elusiveness and seems to be slower this year.
Should be no questiopn in your mind ...
It doesn’t matter how nay YPC Scott has if they aren’t in the situations that count! First downs, grinding out 3 or 4 when it’s needed to get a First down. Busting 20 and more runs! Beating the defense by giving a hit when he’s tackled. These are the yards I look at! Benson had 106 in CLEVELAND… I’d be just as happy if he had 56 so long as they are 56 crucial yards.
I represent the Bengals of Cincinnati with extreme passion and prejudice and make no apologies for it!
I'm a Benson Lover
That physical smash mouth style, to me, is the Definition of football. But OMG are his hands TERRIBLE! He is no threat to catch a pass out the backfield and we need a solid screen pass threat. I’m sure Jay G. could do a lot more with Scott as the main guy.
and to be fair to Benson, last week the D was in the back field
before he even got to the line on about 5 of his carries.
I don't get this at all
I watched Scott against both my team and the Ravens. From what I’ve seen, this guy deserves to be a starter. He finds the hole, hits it hard, and finishes (twss) . I was watching both games wondering “how is this guy not the main man there”
This message will self destruct
Who the hell's interrupting my Kung Fu? - Black Dynamite
With two D's, for a double dose of this pimpin'
I don't under the "we had a rushing offense in 2009 but not in 2010"
Benson had more attempts in 2010 than in 2009, didn’t he? The difference was not a change in attitude about running the ball, but rather than our yards per attempt simply plummeted. Therein lies the difference. Our running game sucked in 2010 because it SIMPLY SUCKED, not because we didn’t try to use it.
We had only slightly less rushing attempts as a team per game in 2010 than in 2009, but I’d say that was much more likely due to the fact that we were so frequently playing from behind, rather than running the ball to protect the lead.
Benson simply had an outlier year in 2009 when he had a good year. The stats from the rest of his career are mediocre to poor, depending on the situation.
"Benson had more attempts in 2010 than in 2009, didn’t he?"
Yes. But he missed three games in 2009. Avg. per game and he had more in 2009.
Managing Editor at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Josh Kirkendall on Nov 27, 2011 5:08 PM EST up reply actions

by 


























