Bengals Not Expected To Use The Franchise Tag On Johnathan Joseph Or Cedric Benson
With expiring contracts on the horizon, the Cincinnati Bengals have decisions to make. Will they sign Johnathan Joseph to a deal that could be the most expensive contract for a defensive player in franchise history? Or will they sign a running back that, arguably, could begin showing diminishing returns. Then there's backups, lower-profile starters and that doesn't even cover the restricted free agents that started for the team in 2010.
But at least they have one out. They could use the franchise tag on one player and be done with worrying about that player. But if there's no CBA, then the tag doesn't matter. Not really. The tag still assures that the team has that player for another year, allowing them to continue negotiating.
Either way, it might not matter.
According to Geoff Hobson, don't expect the team to use the franchise tag on either Joseph or Cedric Benson because the team wants to see what happens with the Collective Bargaining Agreement.
But no matter what happens, don’t look for the Bengals to use the franchise tag on either of their two key free agents, cornerback Johnathan Joseph or running back Cedric Benson. They want to sign both to long-term deals with sane salary cap hits. But not before the CBA is done because they want to make sure the deals fit whatever system they get.
Eagles quarterback Michael Vick and Patriots guard Logan Mankins have already been tagged by their respective teams. The Eagles also placed the transition tag on place kicker David Akers. The Oakland Raiders are reportedly going to tag defensive end Richard Seymour, while the Indianapolis Colts could tag Peyton Manning if a long-term deal isn't completed soon. Other players expected to have the franchise tag placed on them includes (but not limited to): Pittsburgh's LaMarr Woodley, San Diego's Vincent Jackson and Baltimore's Haloti Ngata.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
unreal.
IMO this is really really stupid. The Bengals are the only team playing the “wait and see what happens” game and as always its going to come back to haunt us….I read somewhere that Bill Polian has 4 different offseason scenario’s depending on what happens w/the CBA…..we have an owner who refuses to believe his Franchise QB will retire b/c he despises him so much, and won’t even begin making smart football decisions that solidify a strong foundation for the future….
The Curse of Bo Jackson: Jan 13th,1991- present day
I hate being a Bengals fan
I really do. But this is what we deal with year in and year out. I’m not surprised. Just disappointed.
$14 million for a CB?
That’s what I read recently. That is much more than CP9 money and JJoe is injured frequently. Franchise tag to JJoe or Benson would be a very stupid business decision foreclosing any hope to upgrade via free agency other positions of need.
I agree
$14 M is a little steep, especially if his constant nagging injuries start to become more serious. But I do love Joesph’s heart and talent. He showed a lot by playing Week 17 on a bad ankle in a meaningless game when many other veterans sat out. I really hope we can work out a deal in the area of 4 years 40 M, with 20 or so guaranteed.
by CincyMike56 on Feb 15, 2011 10:21 AM EST up reply actions
14 million is more than a little steep. J-Jo is great, but the injuries drag down his value.
Hopefully they do get that long term deal done that they were talking about, but 14 million? That’s a little obscene.
I hope they can sign him to a long-term deal
This defense is built around our corners, and if we lose Joseph, we lose our defensive identity. A.Jones is good, but he’s not a shutdown guy like Joseph is, plus, who knows how is neck injury will shape up. And though I like Trent, I still think he’s more of a nickle guy.
Fight Bengals Fatalism!
Transition Tag Joseph please
Let a team make him an offer, and then match it if the Ravens or Steelers sign him! Or just match it anyway.
Cincyjungle.com Provisional Contributor for the NFL Draft
Follow me on Twitter for Bengals & NFL draft talk
sad day for bengals fans
you knew it was going to come to this, mike and his money or mike and his cb.
jo-jo the bronco in 2011. =(
" I for one, welcome our new Buffalo overlords. " - Whokebe
Jo-Jo the Raven in 2011.
You know they’ll do it.
ugh
That would be terrible. The only thing the Bengals have going for them is that apparently J-Joe really wants to stay. He said earlier that he’d sign the franchise tag offer the first day he received it and I’m sure he’d be even more stoked on a long-term deal. Just get it done—that way they won’t have to use a high pick on a CB and can focus on another need. Joseph as a Raven would be a disaster.
by Anthony Cosenza on Feb 15, 2011 1:29 PM EST up reply actions
Interesting
I’m disappointed we won’t be using the franchise tag on Joseph, but a long-term deal for Benson? Really? I’d assumed he was gone, and that we’d be taking LeShoure or someone like that.
by Big Sky Bengal on Feb 15, 2011 11:25 AM EST reply actions
Well depending on how long it takes for a new CBA
I’ve read that if it’s pushed into August/September then one of the measures to insure a full season would be cancel free agency and all free agents are assigned to their original team with a 20% pay raise. If Mikey thinks that there is no way they will work a deal out before then than this is a great move to save money and cap space. If they do a quick deal then all we will get for JJ is a compensation pick. I would never tag Benson, period. He’s worth maybe 3 million a year and they can resign him b/c who will take him?
Since Carson is under contract
His $11 million plus JJoe’s $14 million is $25 million out of a total payroll around $100 million. That is 25% of salaries tied up with two players.
Not smart.
Of course if Carson does retire or is traded, thats different. But Carson’s problems won’t be resolved by the time for the franchise option has come and gone.

by 


























