Which Bengals Player Could Be A "Salary Cap Casualty" This Year?
The Washington Redskins released running back Clinton Portis on Monday, mostly thanks to an $8.3 million price tag that he was scheduled to earn in 2011. In 84 games with Washington, Portis posted 6,824 yards rushing and 46 rushing touchdowns. The Bears released defensive tackle Tommie Harris, who was due a $2.5 million roster bonus in June.
Teams often cut veterans with heavy price tags to save money. So which Bengals player could be a possible "salary cap" casualties this year, based on a player with a high salary but limited production?
Antwan Odom: The defensive end signed a five-year deal before the 2008 season after posting a career-high eight quarterback sacks with the Tennessee Titans. Odom had only recorded 12.5 quarterback sacks through his first four seasons with the Titans and the Bengals rewarded him with a five-year deal worth $29.5 million. With the Bengals, Odom has only played 22 of a possible 48 games in his first three seasons with the Bengals, recording 11 quarterback sacks. Odom has $9.8 million in base salary due to him over the next two seasons.
Robert Geathers: Scheduled to earn $8.15 million over the next two seasons, while only averaging 2.6 quarterback sacks per season dating back to 2007. In the past four years combined, Geathers has 10.5 quarterback sacks total. The same number he recorded in 2006 alone -- the season that the Bengals rewarded him with a six-year deal worth $33.75 million.
Domata Peko: A defensive tackle like Peko isn't really measured with tackles, sacks or even quarterback pressures. He's generally the victim of being double-teamed, mostly because he often lines up in the gap between the center and guard. However, the emergence of Pat Sims and Geno Atkins could make Peko more dispensable. The defensive tackle is scheduled to earn $12.2 million in base salary over the next four seasons. Was rated as the worst rush defender on the team by Pro Football Focus in 2010, second-worst rush defender in 2009 (behind Tank Johnson) and fourth-worst rush defender in 2008.
Tank Johnson: The Bengals signed Tank Johnson to a four-year deal in March of 2010 that some could call questionable. Johnson came to Cincinnati on a one-year deal in 2009 and graded as the worst defensive player on the team by PFF, most notably his rush defense. After only playing seven games in 2010 due to an injury, Johnson is scheduled to make $7.15 million over the next three seasons.
Chad Ochocinco: Scheduled to earn $6 million in 2010, Ochocinco has been rumored as a possible veteran that could be released, mostly through conjectured by the media. Though it's not hard to come to similar a conclusion. Chad Ochocinco had a decent year in 2009, barely surpassing the 1,000-yard mark and recording nine touchdowns, which is impressive enough. But distractions, along with a season that shows noticeable decline based on age gives the impression that he's less likely to return a $6 million investment based on production on the field. Though if someone could, we suspect Chad could.
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The only player on that list I don't see being cut is Peko
Love him or hate him, the coaches look at him as a leader on the defense. I’d be shocked to see him gone anytime soon.
Fight Bengals Fatalism!
Trade Chad
Keep Peko- and maybe Geathers. And say goodbye to the others.
by IgnatiusJReilly on Feb 28, 2011 4:06 PM EST reply actions
OFF WITH THIER HEADS
Then put the money into J-Joe.
Sure. Everyone has a plan, until they get punched in the mouth - Mike Tyson
I would normally agree, but think we need to keep one of the D-ends for depth purposes (Geathers is cheaper, so I think you know how that goes….) and Peko. Other than that, c-ya……
by The Van Buren Boys on Feb 28, 2011 4:31 PM EST up reply actions
all of them
trade chad to new england….lol
see how he likes being that jack-ass there
send him somewhere the coach has some nutz
chad’s deserving of a mike singletary type coach,get in his punk ass face
"A team is more than a group of individuals,its a group of individuals that come together to make a team"
That's just it, Chad wouldn't be a problem in NE
I blame his antics on the organization that’s enabled them. To me Chad has always seemed like a decent guy and hard worker, who just doesn’t know his limits when it comes to being an entertainer. I think if he had ever been checked, or asked to show more commitment, or told that he was hurting the team, he would have changed. With the Chad-Marvin back and forth lately it’s been clear that Chad is very concerned with Marvin’s opinion. Where has the leadership and accountability been? The Bengals remind me of Dallas when Wade Phillips was fired and a player said the new coach was being strict and actually making the players show up to meetings.
I don’t know whether it’s Marvin, or Sheppard, or Mike is preventing them from hurting Chad’s feelings, but I think if at any point someone had checked Chad he would have been a much more committed player. Instead his antics have spiraled out of control. I have no doubt that if he gets to a team that will actually hold him accountable and expects better of him, he will get back to his old form and make an significant impact on his new team.
Your high!
Chad has been a problem ever sense the monday night game where he made the wrong read,and espn put him on the spot for all to see.at that moment chad turned from leader of the team,to a cancer
and your right he’d work somewhere else,but habits are hard to break,plus the guy just isnt that great anymore to begin with,just isnt worth having a guy like that anywhere near the team
"A team is more than a group of individuals,its a group of individuals that come together to make a team"
you do have a good poit about enableing him though
"A team is more than a group of individuals,its a group of individuals that come together to make a team"
Cut them all.
I honestly think we’ll Keep Peko and Ocho though, that’s it.
Odom – Replaced by Dunlap
Geathers – Replaced by Johnson
Peko – Replaced by Sims and Atkins
Tank – Same as above
Ocho – kind of replaced by Simpson, but not completely yet.
Don’t know why we hold out such loyalty for overpaid, underperforming players, especially since we know what we’re going to get with them.
You're taking crazy pills
if you think they will and/or should cut Peko. ESPECIALLY if you’re suggesting they cut Tank as well. There’s no way they could afford to cut both of them—even if they landed Fairley or Dareus.
The 4 others besides Peko should be gone either by trades (Chad) or releasing them. Also, Tommie Harris got cut today, he may be someone to look at for depth.
by Anthony Cosenza on Feb 28, 2011 5:28 PM EST reply actions
Adding a Tommie Harris and Cutting Peko/Tank would be a lateral move...
I doubt we’d get any better by it. I like the signings of veteran players on the cheap, but only as backups or stop gaps… not as solutions
Right.
Hence why I said “for depth”. I wouldn’t sign Harris to start but I think he’d be better than Tank.
by Anthony Cosenza on Feb 28, 2011 5:50 PM EST up reply actions
Peko and geathers will stay.
Id be interested to see how releasing the others, as well as a possible carson trade, would open up the books. how much room will they have for rebuilding after these moves are made and the new CBA is finalized?
He called me a baboon, he thinks I'm his wife.

by 

























