2011 NFL Draft: Cincinnati Bengals Got The Player They Wanted In Georgia's A.J. Green
At face cover, the Cincinnati Bengals selected the player that they had number one on their draft board. With Georgia's A.J. Green, the Cincinnati Bengals are putting together a core of young wide receivers that includes Jerome Simpson and Andre Caldwell, as well as Jordan Shipley, who was selected in last year's NFL Draft.
Simpson and Caldwell posted 35 receptions for 547 yards receiving and three touchdowns, combined, during the final three games last season. Jordan Shipley and tight end Jermaine Gresham, last year's first round pick, led all AFC rookies with 52 receptions last season. And now the Bengals are adding the dynamics of a player like A.J. Green. That's just scary.
Some, including yours truly, preferred a defensive player like Patrick Peterson to supplement a (possibly) departing Johnathan Joseph. But Green is a top-ranked wide receiver prospect that the Bengals had a need, allowing them to address the position now that Terrell Owens is gone and Chad Ochocinco isn't expected to return.
Soon after the Atlanta Falcons swapped first round picks with Cleveland, giving the Browns this year's second and fourth round picks, as well as next year's first and fourth round selections, it was also learned that the Cincinnati Bengals were originally involved with the Falcons, who also wanted Green. However, the deal fell through at the last second because the Bengals felt the selection was undervalue and decided to make the selection on Green themselves.
A flurry of quarterbacks were selected early in the first round, including Florida State's Christian Ponder, who is one of three quarterbacks the Bengals were targeting in the second round. With Ponder gone, TCU's Andy Dalton and Arkansas' Ryan Mallett appear as the most likely candidates to be selected in the second round on Friday, which starts at six o'clock with the Bengals selecting third.
92 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'd say the draft is going better than expected...
Not only did they get the best WR in the draft, they also didn’t get caught up in the QB panic and should have some nice options tomorrow at #35
Add another selection to the poll:
Its ok, but would rather have made the trade with ATL
"You don't live in Cleveland, You live in Cincinnati"-Sam Wyche
"I promise to throw interceptions for touchdowns just as good as he did" -Jordan Palmer
Options
The Bengals didn’t feel the value was there. Either did Buffalo or Denver and maybe Arizona. It’s how it goes. They got their man and didn’t reach Minnesota style.
Cleveland did well with what they got and probably did the right thing moving back up. Not sure Mike Brown’s heart would have stood all that wheeling and dealing.
There’s still work to do and the second round pick really needs to be a hit – be that Dalton, Williams or anyone else.
by wiseking on Apr 29, 2011 12:52 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Options
The Bengals didn’t feel the value was there. Either did Buffalo or Denver and maybe Arizona. It’s how it goes. They got their man and didn’t reach Minnesota style.
Cleveland did well with what they got and probably did the right thing moving back up. Not sure Mike Brown’s heart would have stood all that wheeling and dealing.
There’s still work to do and the second round pick really needs to be a hit – be that Dalton, Williams or anyone else.
by wiseking on Apr 29, 2011 12:53 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
+1
I’ll confess to having my feelings hurt a little at not taking the trade. I feel better that Mallett and Dalton are the guys left, since they are the two that I think are the best choices at 35.
I hope we get Mallett
I think we need a QB but....
I see aaron william from texas sitting there. Wouldn’t that be a nice pick. he can play safety or corner. We could also but ghee at safety. I think dalton goes to buffalo, I would almost rather have williams instead of mallet.
I don't want Mallet
If Dalton goes to Buffalo, I would prfer Bowers or Williams.
It must be inordinately taxing to be such a boob. ~ The Brain
My vote for the second option reflects what TennBengalfan suggested
I like Green. A lot. My whole life is as green as I can make it. And I will get over being flabbergasted over Mike Brown’s latest fit of stupidity. Yes, AJ Green is exceptional but a Jon Baldwin, a Torrey Smith, a Randall Cobb, or even a Greg Little would have sufficed to augment Jerome and Ship. It’s really a matter of arithmetic: 5 > 1. It really can’t be argued. That said, what’s done is done and I do welcome AJ Green wholeheartedly to the clusterfuck we call the Bengals. Huzzah!
by IgnatiusJReilly on Apr 29, 2011 12:01 AM EDT reply actions
What if there's no draft next year?
Idea on trading picks was “trade at your own risk”
Change gone come mane! Trust me! Cause i Bleed tigerblood!--Jerome Simpson
I think the chances of there being no draft next year
are roughly equivalent of a snowball’s chances in hell. To wit; none. Both the players and the owners are too greedy to let there be no football for any appreciable length of time. Draft picks for next year are, in my mind, perfectly safe.
by IgnatiusJReilly on Apr 29, 2011 1:31 AM EDT up reply actions
No, if there is football, there doesn't have to be a CBA/union, which means there doesn't have to be/won't be a draft.
Antitrust issues. Players keep winning in court, they’ll have to play football, but draft could be out.
There’s a decent chance the player’s keep winning in court, it’s hard to tell whether the current players will attack the draft or let that slide. However, if they don’t go back to being a union, then every incoming rookie class would attack the draft, and a court would have to find that a draft is necessary for there to be football. I don’t think a court would find that a draft is necessary.
Thus, there’s a greater than snowball in hell chance that there is no draft next year. No union/CBA=big problems for restrictions on player movement.
Change gone come mane! Trust me! Cause i Bleed tigerblood!--Jerome Simpson
Players would love a bidding war instead of a draft.
Which is why the NFL should be very very careful with how far they take these legal proceedings
Just like Chris Pery sufficed in place of Steven Jackson?
I liked the idea of trading back, but I wanted to stay in the top ten and get a playmaker. I think the Bengals did the right thing in taking the premeir wide reciever in this draft, and possibly the best player in the draft.
It must be inordinately taxing to be such a boob. ~ The Brain
next two rounds will make the draft
Love Mallett and hope he’s the pick. Could live with Dalton (at least they didnt trade up to get him if they do take him). Brooks Reed is also a guy that intuiges me as a 4-3 end/OLB hybrid type guy. they’ve got some good options and Green should be a stud (if he’s got somebody to get him the ball)
Mallett would be a terrible pick.....
He isn’t a WC offense guy. Not sure why some of our fans don’t get that. He doesn’t fit the system. He isn’t an extremely accurate guy. He doesn’t get rid of the ball quickly. He isn’t particularly bright. Is he a good QB? Yes. Would he have been a better fit before the OC change? Yes. That doesn’t mean he fits now. Maybe I missed it, but I don’t remember Cincy spending much time watching this guy. I’m guessing the reason is b/c the wrote him off early.
Who wants a QB that has zero leadership skills anyways? Not me.
If Dalton is there tomorrow, and that is who are staff wants? Fine, snatch him up. If not, just like last year (Dunlap), there are plenty of guys that have fallen that would be good choices. Guys like Bowers, Reed, Ayers, and Williams.
mallet would be fine for a second round pick
he was in a pro style and is more then accurate on his throws. I do agree that his motion is long though.
Mallet is the most accurate QB in the draft
other than that, I agree
Who says he has zero leadership skills?
Watch him with Gruden on that QB Camp thing and you’ll see that not only is he not stupid but he’s actually pretty with it when it comes to football smarts- as evidenced by his drawing up plays on the board and discussing them knowingly with Jon. Dalton and Ponder’s arms seem better suited for this WCO because that’s all they’re capable of- the short to intermediate throws. Mallett has the full arsenal- and there’s nothing wrong with his delivery. Though slow in terms of foot speed, he’s very adept at avoiding pressure, accurate throwing on the roll, and, with that cannon of an arm, capable of making throws even when his feet aren’t set perfectly. Dalton’s tiny ass is gonna end up with balls batted back in his face whereas Mallett can see over the offensive line and make throwing lanes where he chooses. His detractors here keep saying, “he isn’t a west coast offense QB!” but, if it’s short, quick, accurate passes you want out of your QB, he’s got all that and a lot more. Dalton may just have it but no more at all. There’s nothing special about Dalton, though I understand that red hair is not a common occurrence in the general population. Excellence, not adequacy is what we’re after. Mallet > Dalton.
by IgnatiusJReilly on Apr 29, 2011 1:41 AM EDT up reply actions
idk bowers also has a good chance to be there at 35...
I would love to have dalton but you dont really find guys like bower out there and think about are frontline then bowers and pposite with dunlap.. seriousl how can we trust geathers and odom… the safe pick would be bowers but i could see why they would draft dalton
by s.dotmoneysign12 on Apr 29, 2011 12:08 AM EDT reply actions
QB is a bigger need then DE
IF our staff likes Dalton, and he is there, and we’ve decided to draft a QB this year, I think you have to take him over Bowers.
Bowers is an impact player
you can get a free agent that will do what Dalton can but not Bowers. Even if you only get 4 years from him thats 4 years Dunlap cant be doubled every play like he probably will be this year.
I agree
From what I have heard hes probably a one contract player. And I would rather have 4 years of him than 1 of a qb that will be replaced.
RE: Medical issue
It’s a HUGE deal from what we’re seeing and hearing.
Managing Editor at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Josh Kirkendall on Apr 29, 2011 1:04 AM EDT up reply actions
Agreed
If he’s lasted this long, there’s obviously a huge knee issue. I’m for avoiding him all together. I don’t trust our medical staff to diagnose a cold much less a knee problem. Maybe if he was still there in the 3rd
Lol
I don’t trust our medical staff to diagnose a cold much less a knee problem.
If that’s not an accurate endorsement for avoiding Bowers, I don’t know it.
Managing Editor at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Josh Kirkendall on Apr 29, 2011 1:15 AM EDT up reply actions
Unless you're privy to some insider info that the rest of us aren't
Bowers himself contends that his injury- and what he had surgery to correct, was a slight tear in the meniscus. The injury has, admittedly, healed a bit slowly but there’s nothing credible out there to suggest an absence of cartilage or the shock-absorbing meniscii, nothing to indicate a “bone-on-bone” situation which could make Bowers into a one-contract player. Frankly, I trust Bowers and his doctors’ opinions on the subject a great deal more than any so-called draft analyst’s. If he’s there at #35, it would be like Rey and Carlos falling the last two drafts all rolled into one. We’d have to take him.
by IgnatiusJReilly on Apr 29, 2011 1:55 AM EDT up reply actions
Rey and Carlos weren't expected to go in the top 10
and what do you mean you’d trust Bowers opinion more than others?? He’s got tens of millions of reason to lie to NFL personnel
His
and his doctors’ opinions. Nothing out there says that this injury is career threatening. He and his doctors say it isn’t. There aren’t two sides to this issue. One is mere speculation. As to Rey and Carlos, I’m talking about the combined value of us acquiring them where we did and it’s a freaking analogy, not necessarily meant to be analyzed.
by IgnatiusJReilly on Apr 29, 2011 2:03 AM EDT up reply actions
The last person I would EVER trust about an injury is the player
see Antonio Bryant
In Bowers' defense
he’s a good guy whereas Antonio is definitely not.
by IgnatiusJReilly on Apr 29, 2011 2:11 AM EDT up reply actions
Money trumps good intentions
remember, this is a business, it’s not personal
I know that
There simply isn’t anything verifiable or credible out there that suggests otherwise. Hence, I’ll go with Bowers and his team.
by IgnatiusJReilly on Apr 29, 2011 2:20 AM EDT up reply actions
Supposedly failed Denver's medical exam
mortreport Chris Mortensen
"@ProfessorHooch: @mortreport @AdamSchefter I gotta know does Denver have shot at Bowers at 36 >> I don’t think he passed their physical
Change gone come mane! Trust me! Cause i Bleed tigerblood!--Jerome Simpson
So
I don’t think he passed. Who knows? I think it’s definitely worth a shot and certainly worth more than this year’s Jimmy Clausen aka Tweedleginger aka Ginger Snaps, etc.
by IgnatiusJReilly on Apr 29, 2011 2:05 AM EDT up reply actions
if he's still there in the 3rd, sure
I’m not for getting a QB in the second either. I want to grab the best O lineman. But, I NEVER get what i want with this team
Now a stud guard
like Ijalana or, maybe, Orlando Franklin, I could totally see the argument for. Same with a Rahim Moore, best safety in the draft. Just not Dalton. I might even prefer Marvin Austin over Bowers anyway, especially considering I think DT may be a bigger need than DE. I do think we can get a good guard like Will Rackley or even Marcus Cannon in the third.
by IgnatiusJReilly on Apr 29, 2011 2:10 AM EDT up reply actions
I wouldn't be opposed to that in the least
grab Muckelroy in the 4th, just so we can say we drafted a QB. Seems like we’ll be wasting a pick regardless
I agree he's a better pick than any QBs, and would probably be for it, just showing where Kirk's
probably getting his info. Still a decent gamble in the 2nd round, better gamble then a 4th rounder turned borderline 1st rounder.
Change gone come mane! Trust me! Cause i Bleed tigerblood!--Jerome Simpson
I hate the pick
I just dont see how he helps. Hes going to be a good player, but a wrs a luxery pick, not a building block. Ocho was one of the best recievers in the nfl here and what did that get us. Greens a good player, but you cant build a team from the outside in. Hes going to waste away for years untill this team finds a competent oline and qb.
We aren't building a team.....
We’re retooling a team that won the division and made the playoffs two seasons ago.
We need a name on offense. We don’t have one at QB. Don’t have one at WR now. And don’t really have one at RB. Getting Green gives our offense credibility. You guys can believe in Simpson and Caldwell all you want, but I’d rather not count on them. The WC offense needs good WR’s. The WR’s make the plays in this offense. Not the QB.
the wco needs ok recievers
look what philly used to do with Jason Avent and Hank Basket. And this team is no longer retooling, when you win 4 games, and lose your franchise qb, your rebuilding. This a different team than the one that won the divison, it will have about 5 starters from that team returning.
Philly did what they did with Donavon McNabb
and would have been 1000x better if they had every drafted decent receivers when he was in his prime.
Fight Bengals Fatalism!
by Paul Cannon on Apr 29, 2011 12:36 AM EDT up reply actions
I agree he would have been better with better recievers
but thats not the first peice to the puzzle. A recievers fine to draft when you have a team in place, but drafting one with now line qb or runningback is just a set up for failure. You build a team from the inside out, not outside in. With no qb, line, or rb, Green is useless.
Jerry Rice averged just over 5 reception per game
IF he’s the next Jerry Rice, Is 5 receptions per game going to make this a championship winning team??
RE:
No matter who you picked in the first round, it wasn’t going to make it a “championship winning team.” Far too many pieces to fill and one of those was WR.
Managing Editor at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Josh Kirkendall on Apr 29, 2011 1:11 AM EDT up reply actions
All the more reason to accept Atlanta's trade
draft position value is not something written in stone. If we didn’t have so many needs, I would have held out for a higher point value, but making the trade, we could have grabbed Carimi, then Dalton, possibly Marvin Austin at the bottom of 2,….
Amen.
Everyone seems to think we were goi to solve all this teams problems with one draft pick. Unless Andrew Luck jumped up on stage right after e Bills picked and said “Just kidding guys! Draft me!” there wasn’t anyone else there when we picked that was going to single handily turn this team around. Of anyone available, Peterson a possible exception, Green has the most chance of being a super star caliber player. He was considered by some people to be the best athlete in the draft. And we got him. Beat player available at a position of need? That’s just solis drafting and should be e end of the discussion.
@Stanley1
Sure, you’re retooling if that means replacing half your roster, your coaching staff and implementing an entirely new offensive system. At some point the line between definition of retooling and rebuilding gets blurred.
Managing Editor at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Josh Kirkendall on Apr 29, 2011 1:10 AM EDT up reply actions
Where i dont hate the pick...
But how do we protect quarterback x to get these guys the ball. We have alot of holes to fill. Green will be a beast though and this draft is deep enough to still fill them
by quickslant on Apr 29, 2011 9:02 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
i rather have us get a qb through free agency rather than just put dalton in from week 1
think about it we draft bowers, we have a solid Defensive line, hope Jjo comes back, and then we have pacman jones and we need to draft a safety also and then our linebackers can be addressed later in the rounds and then you have a good D built for you for the next season and after that ou just have to add depth
by s.dotmoneysign12 on Apr 29, 2011 12:20 AM EDT reply actions
I'd give up a 3rd or a 4th for Claussen, better value imo then Kapernick in the third.
Or just sign Leinart/Smith, no reason to reach on a pick this year on guys that don’t appear to be long term solutions just b/c others have done it.
Change gone come mane! Trust me! Cause i Bleed tigerblood!--Jerome Simpson
Early 2nd isn't a reach; trading up would have been
All 3 guys you mentioned are proven failures. I’d rather get a new green guy than someone that’s been given multiple opportunities and failed everytime.
Not a big Claussen fan
but I wouldn’t call him a failure after 1 year on a crap team
Sorry
but anything higher than mid-third round is a reach for Dalton. I’m talking real value here and not the artificially inflated, lockout-fueled panic value.
by IgnatiusJReilly on Apr 29, 2011 1:59 AM EDT up reply actions
If he's there with the third pick tomorrow
I think the Bengals are taking Dalton
Swanson Pyramid of Greatness
Handshakes — Firm, Dry, Solid. 3 seconds.
by cesarhernandez on Apr 29, 2011 12:24 AM EDT reply actions
RE:
Agreed. It’s almost a certainty. If not Dalton, then it’s Mallett. They are going QB. Period.
Managing Editor at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Josh Kirkendall on Apr 29, 2011 1:12 AM EDT up reply actions
I would have agreed until about 4 hours ago.
Turning down that trade offer for the #4 pick should at least put doubt into your mind that they are no matter what going QB.
I don’t know what to make of it, we’ll see tomorrow. They’ll probably draft a QB, but they may already have other plans for the position.
Change gone come mane! Trust me! Cause i Bleed tigerblood!--Jerome Simpson
From a purely football perspective, I'm okay with it.
I think Green will be a good-to-great player, and he strikes me as being very serious and committed. That’s a notable quality in a WR. But, is he worth the picks we could’ve had instead, if we’d gone through with that trade? He’ll be judged against that, as unfair as it is.
I initially assumed we’ll get whichever QB Buffalo doesn’t want, in the second. But what if the Pats trade down? Dalton and Mallett could go, and then we’ll have to decide between OL, DL, or someone like Kaepernick. (And I’d be fine with Kaepernick, even if that’s high for him.)
by Big Sky Bengal on Apr 29, 2011 12:26 AM EDT reply actions
I think kaepernick could be drafted by the bills.
Bailey ran a pistol offense and kaep played the pistol offense in college at Nevada. He’s also got a good arm and potential.
by ddbumpus on Apr 29, 2011 12:36 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Gailey not Bailey. Damn you spell check!
by ddbumpus on Apr 29, 2011 12:36 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I like the pick
Was there really anything else that much better. I mean you can say what you want now but we will see how this draft was in a year or 2 and I think AJ will be a good one for years to come while im not so sure about the other people we could of taken besides Patrick Peterson which i dont think would of really been a productive pick
Not picking Peterson
May mean you break the bank to secure JJo. Time will tell.
Picking Green ends the Chad saga and it’s clear from Marvin’s comments that it is time to move on.
by wiseking on Apr 29, 2011 12:59 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
This is the Carson Palmer draft, with or without him. Get the best receiver, grab an O lineman and build a bubble. Even if he doesn’t come the team is building correctly if they do that. I would have made the trade with Atlanta and used next years picks to move up and get Andrew Luck. Meanwhile, allowing the team to mature into a new system and getting that line ready to truly protect in the new scheme for a rookie top talent like Luck. That might have st this team for a number of years.
http://bengalsworld.com/forum/image.php?u=35&type=sigpic&dateline=1195110784
by Dr. Johnny Fever on Apr 29, 2011 1:57 AM EDT reply actions
Whoever is sitting at #1 next year is not going to give up their pick.
Any team that sucks bad enough to draft first is going to thank their stars they did it in the year of Luck. No way anyone gives him up, even for 10 draft picks.
And I have to keep coming back to is, we don’t know what Atlanta offered. Apparently whatever it was, it also wasn’t worth a Von Miller or a Marcel Dareus or a Patrick Peterson, so why should we assume it was worth an AJ Green? I think Atlanta got desperate after we picked Green and inflated their offer to Cleveland to make sure they at least got Jones.if the offer they gave Cleveland was technically undervalued, imagine what a lesser offer (that probably did NOT include next years first round pick) would have looked like? Maybe, just for once, this team was actually smart instead of jumping at the first chance to trade back regardless of value. But there are people on this board who think draft day trades are a mark of pure genius and the fact that we passed on one, regardless of the value, is just a sign of stupidity.
I’m just going to enjoy watching the AJ Green web gems for the next 5+ years.
well then...
here’s hoping its us!! :D Luck&Green in Stripes ’12!
OH Yeah! Duffman's pelvis is thrusting in the direction of the problem!
TO: "Coach said he would address that."
Drafting Dalton at all
would be redundant. Dan LeFevour is everything Dalton is and more. Better overall stats, a better runner, pretty much the same arm, and he’s been playing Clipboard Jesus for a year learning the ins and outs of the pro game already.
by IgnatiusJReilly on Apr 29, 2011 2:07 AM EDT reply actions
Not sure about Lefevour, but I agree on the sentiment.
Everyone expects us to draft a QB. Dalton is not even a second round talent, and all of this media “shock” that he wasn’t drafted in the FIRST ROUND is just absurd. The Vikings made one of the biggest reaches in recent history taking Ponder at 12. That doesn’t make Dalton a first round pick, or a top of the 2nd.
With the receiving corp we have now, I say we go after Hasselbeck in FA and sign him to a 3 year deal. He still has at least 3 years left, and we can draft a first round QB next year that hopefully will be a true first round talent and give him a year behind Hasselbeck. Are we going to the playoffs in the next two years? Probably not, but we could come out of that scario with a really solid offense and a defense just hitting it’s stride with by-then-All-Pro linemen Dunlap and Atkins.
It's been forever since Hasselbeck played an entire season
He’s only backup QB material at this point. I’d prefer Smith/Leinert/Edwards/McNabb as a FA signing
"At the very end, somebody took a dump right where I stood in the dugout every day." Dusty Baker
Those will all work, too.
Well, except for Smith or Lienart. I basically just want someone proficient enough to help the receivers continue to grow next year and be able to mentor a young QB eventually. So at least get someone who has won somewhere. mcNabb might be the most talented name on the list, too, but I don’t like his attitude. He’s been moping around and grumbling ever since the Eagles signed Vick, even after he went to Washington. I doubt he’d even want to come here.
Bulged, Hasselbeck, or Gratkowski are probably the best bets. Maybe Edwards.
i hope we get one of the Marcus's
gilbert or Cannon
He has a very treatable
form of non-hodgkins lymphoma that requires just four round of chemo, which he will be done with in June. It absolutely will make him drop on draft day but shouldn’t be a long term problem or prevent him from being a quality NFL lineman.
by IgnatiusJReilly on Apr 29, 2011 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions
ATLANTA's Deal was Useless
They wanted to Cheat the Bengals Only duhhhhhhhhhhh………….they wanted to give us the 27th and 4th and another 4th in next year’s draft only……………..Next Year Ifwe do goodI think we should trade out of the 1st round and stock pile our draft picks like the Patroits they rip everyone off every year but its good for them LOL…………Overall In 2maro’s 2nd Round i think we go Dalton If hes There if not then go Paea from Oregon State then in the 3rd go OL and 4th go FS 5th go OL 6th go LB in the 2 7’s go OL
Bowers is going to be tempting if he's still there.
But that kind of draft tumble is a little frightening. Dunlap was expected to go in the late first round, same with Rey. Bowers was possibly being considered as NUMBER ONE OVERALL a month ago. Atlanta tradedup 21 spots to get an injured player who needs surgery. If Bowers, who was considered the most talented pass rusher in a draft that had a record TWELVE defensive linemen go in the first round, slips all the way to 35 then something is really wrong with him. Rahim Moore fills a much bigger hole. But Marvin might not be able to resist trying to steal another Dunlap…tough spot.
If the Bengals get their QB in the 2nd round then this draft is going very well....
it would justify not taking that trade offer. The Bengals werent the only ones to turn it down.
Slower Traffic Keep Right!
I think someone trades into NE's spot at 33 to grab Dalton.
I’d be shocked if that didn’t happen. Belechick loves his deals, he probably wouldn’t have to move very far down in the 2nd to do it, he already has THREE 2nd round picks I think, and he’s had a whole day to hammer out a bargain with someone. Might even be us. But I hope it isn’t.
The more I think about it the more I’d be alright with drafting Mallet. I’ve been really wary of him, but I find myself thinking about him the same way I thought about Cam Newton. He has the potential to absolutely self destruct in this organization and take the team down with him for a decade, but if the character reports are exaggerated (and there seems to be growing consensus that maybe they are) he is by far the most talented QB on the board. He might even be the most talented QB in this entire draft.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, as long as this team is run by MB and his spawn (god how awful is it to see Katie Balckburn on those Play 60 commercials?) it is not going to be solidly managed into a perennial contender ala the Steelers or Patriots. We can talk about strategy and sound football logic all we want, the only way we’re going to make any noise is to take some big gambles and have them pay off. Right now, Mallet looks like a decent gamble to me in the 2nd round. He has a better chance of becoming a franchise caliber QB than Dalton. I saw something a while back about 2nd round QB’s – they listed the last 10 or so and I think 1 of them was still in the league after his initial contract ran out. Dalton is at best a 2nd round talent. Mallet is a first round talent who has slipped to the 2nd. I say roll the dice. What’s the worst that can happen? We lose a lot of football games and are the laughing stock of the NFL? How ever will we learn to deal with THAT?
knowing us we will do the unsmart thing we always do
watch as the picks the browns get from the trade turn out better then aj green. well probly take mallet and bowers both of which will be busts. something obviously didnt check out with other teams and they actually have good medical staffs ours sucks and I dont think they could locate a tumor if it was the size of mexico. also mallet is looking a lot like a suckier palmer. cant run with our crapy oline he will get squashed play after play. no leadership skills it was said in previous articles on the way to the draft. I would rather trade chad for a second get a oline and dalton.
by bengalsfanforlife on Apr 29, 2011 10:11 AM EDT reply actions
I don't know how you think we'd get Mallet AND Bowers.
But if we somehow did, I’d say that would be a pretty big draft success.
I really hope we can get over this whole Cleveland trade thing. We have no idea what the Falcons offered us. What we do know is that at least 3 other teams were offered the same days before the draft and they all turned it down, too. That tells me that they upped the stakes considerably to make the trade with Cleveland. So dont’ look at AJ Green as being worth the 3 draft picks Cleveland got, think of him as being worth MAYBE a late first round pick and two second round picks. If he turns out to be another Larry Fitzgerald, would you say he was worth that? I sure would. And there is absolutely nothing in his scouting report from ANYONE that suggests he doesn’t have that potential. He’s one of the safest bets in this draft. We did the right thing.

by 
























