Second Round NFL Draft 2011: Why The Bengals Could Pass On Clemson Defensive End Da'Quan Bowers
Clemson defensive end Da'Quan Bowers fell out of the first round on Thursday. It was met with both surprise and expectation. We feel that the Bengals will draft a pass rusher this weekend to possibly replace Antwan Odom, who along with being largely ineffective during his three seasons with the Bengals, his salary is ridiculously high and a four-game suspension for violating the league's illegal substances policy could make the Bengals realize his value is far less than his salary. That pass rusher could be defensive end Da'Quan Bowers. But we're not exactly convinced of that.
Bowers is an interesting selection. After posting four quarterback sacks his first two seasons at Clemson, the defensive end dominated college football with 15.5 sacks, posting at least one quarterback sack in ten of 12 games last season. Often projected as a top-five selection, including mock drafts with the Bengals selecting him fourth overall, Bowers seemed like the top defensive line prospect. Then reports surfaced that Bowers' arthroscopic knee surgery to repair a torn meniscus in January was more serious than was being admitted. As a result of his surgery, Bowers missed his school's March 10 Pro Day and the NFL Combine, deciding to hold a personal workout for scouts in April. His 40-time was slower than expected and the general impression was more of disappointment.
"The knee is fine; I'm 100 percent," Bowers insisted. "I still have a lot of work to do. Still strengthening and getting it back to where it needs to be. But it's not hurting. It's not giving me any problems."
According to PFT, the condition of Bowers knee forced some teams to remove the prospect off their boards entirely.
"The reality is the knee is assessed 32 ways by 32 different clubs," Flanagan said. "What we know is that Dr. [James] Andrews and a number of other doctors that examined Da'Quan felt good about the short and long-term term prospects of the knee. But, obviously, there were some teams that were concerned about the knee, and I think that was reflected tonight. Ultimately, we feel very strongly that Da'Quan's knee is going to hold up, not only in the short term but the long term."
The Bengals could be one of those teams worried about his knee. The last time they took a flyer on a player with a bum knee, they ended up paying $7 million to Antonio Bryant. It was conjectured that failing to discover the condition of Bryant's knee led to the Bengals replacing several members of their medical staff. It's difficult not to believe that Bowers' knee doesn't weigh heavily in their minds. The Bengals were already burnt by a player that disregarded informing teams of his actual knee condition; would they risk that again?
Yes. The Bengals were at fault, signing Bryant and then clearing him for practice before the full nature of his knee was revealed. The Bengals eventually righted the issue, releasing Bryant and signing Terrell Owens, who led the Bengals in virtually every statistical receiving category.
But with Bryant possibly fresh in their minds, the damage could be done where it concerns Da'Quan Bowers. Could he become a first round talent falling in the draft, thus becoming a steal (ala Carlos Dunlap)? Sure. But it wouldn't be surprising that Bowers' knee, no matter how convincing the rehabilitation argument is, could force the Bengals to pass over him in the second round.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
so torn
What a great guy to pair with Dunlap. I’m not sure I could pass him up, risky but man what a DL we could have were he to work out.
by stripesinseattle on Apr 29, 2011 11:58 AM EDT reply actions
I'll go with Dr. James Andrews' opinion
Because he’s the ultimate authority on this type of injury. Take Bowers.
by IgnatiusJReilly on Apr 29, 2011 11:59 AM EDT reply actions
Exactly
If the most respected sports medicine – othropaedic surgeon (Dr. Andrews) feels good about BOTH the short-term and long-term prospects of the knee, that is the fiorst and last medical opinion I need to know. Bowers is simply too talented to pass up, escpecially at this point in the draft!!!!!!!!!!
Also, while the Antonio Bryant analogy is relevant, it certainly isn’t exactly the same situation. First, Bowers’ medical records have been made available to all team. More importantly, however, is the fact that at this point, Bowers would be a second round STEAL and that value is too good to pass up.
Bowers would likely get a four-year rookie deal that would be no where near the total dollar ($28 million) or guaranteed dollar ($7 million) amount given to Antonio Bryant last year. Most likely, a Bowers second round contract (assuming the old CBA rules) would mirror Rey Maualuga’ from a two years ago ( Maualuga received $2.84 million in guaranteed money, and his total deal carried a total value of $4.66 million). For that money, I jump all over Da’Quan Bowers.
Not only will Bowers ensure Dunlap does not get double teamed on obvious passing situations, his presence will also make Michael Johnson a better (and fresher) player. The Bengals could also consider moving M. Johnson to SAM linebacker if and when Rey makes the much anticipated move to MIKE.
Overall, for a total value of around $5 million (with roughly half of that – $3 Million – guaranteed) the Bengals would be crazy not to select Bowers. Getting after the QB is so critical in today’s game, and the Bengals need an upgrade after finishing 27th in total sacks in 2010. Bowers and Dunlap would be a dynamic force off the edges (plus, he would add good depth teaming with the aforementioned Michael Johnson, Geathers, Fanene/Frostee).
by The_Black_Stripes on Apr 29, 2011 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions
If Dalton is gone.........
take him and look for K-nick in the third (if he’s still there).
by The Van Buren Boys on Apr 29, 2011 12:02 PM EDT reply actions
And I would select Bowers (see earlier post for reasons why) even if . . .
Andy Dalton is available at #35. While I like Dalton, there are doubts whether he will be a legitimate Franchise QB. Dalton never really played under center, and in fact, looked awkward doing so at the Senior Bowl where he was less than impressive.
Undoubtedly, Andy Dalton is a nice and more than intriguing prospect who strong merits consideration with this pick, but at this point Bowers offers too much value (especially if noted Orthopaedic surgeon Dr. James Andrews has signed off on the long-term health of the knee).
For me, if there are serious doubts about whether a QB can delevop into a true franchise QB, the next best option (especially when a player like Da’Quan Bowers, who possesses natural pass rushing skills, is staring you right in the face) is to select a player that will relentlessly get after the OPPOSING team’s QB!!!
by The_Black_Stripes on Apr 29, 2011 12:59 PM EDT reply actions
Would honestly be ok with either..........
Argument for Dalton: Gresham, Shipley, Simpson, Caldwell and AJ Green. With those weapons (and hopefully some sort of running game, either from CBen or draftee) we don’t need Joe Montana back there. We need an accurate qb with mobility.
Argument for Bowers: Previously ranked as top prospect in this draft. Imagine this: Dunlap, Atkins, (rotate Peko, Sims, etc.) and Bowers as the other bookend…..scary prospect for all other NFL qb’s.
I don’t think you go wrong here…..the only other concern I have after taking either of these guys is O-Line, but we could still get a good guard later on as well (or K-nick possibly in third, although not sure that would be likely considering the run on qb’s).
by The Van Buren Boys on Apr 29, 2011 1:35 PM EDT reply actions
Bowers is worth the risk
If Dr. Andrews says he will be OK, then take him.. He was originally the # 1 Draft pick early on… We could dump Odom and save a boat load of money and Bowers opposite of Dunlap would be awesome… Don’t reach for a QB just because CP is not coming back. We can pick up a free agent as a stop gap.

by 



























