Armando Salguero: Evidence Points To Bengals Inching Towards Carson Palmer Trade
There have been rumblings recently that the Miami Dolphins are highly interested in Bengals quarterback Carson Palmer. Former Dolphins quarterback Dan Marino argued that he'd trade for Carson Palmer, but with nothing more than a third round draft pick. And realistically speaking, no trade can happen until a new collective bargaining agreement is signed -- or the players win the injunction that started today and the owners aren't awarded a stay during an appeal lifting the lockout. By that time, we're looking at 2012 draft picks.
Miami Herald's Armando Salguero, who wrote that Arkansas quarterback Ryan Mallett has no leadership skills, is still "on the Carson Palmer trade bandwagon." Why?
It's not so much anything is confirmed about the Dolphins interest, rather it's that personnel in the front office aren't disputing it.
After I wrote the column on Palmer saying the Dolphins view him as a singular special options above guys like Kyle Orton or Vince Young, I told a high-ranking Dolphins personnel man about my column. He didn't say, "We're definitely going to do that." He did say, "He's a great kid. That would be something to think about for a long time. But he's not available right now."
What's more telling, or worth noting at least, is that Salguero writes that "(every) shred of evidence coming from the Bengals is they might actually be inching toward the idea of trading Palmer."
What evidence? Subjective tweet by Adam Schefter about the team interested in Kevin Kolb? A disputed Peter King blurb? The team doing their homework on most of the quarterbacks expected to be drafted in the first two rounds? Stubborn ownership keeps us firmly in the corner that Carson Palmer won't play at all in 2011. And if he does, it's because he realizes he's being a baby and he'll return and play the season while the Bengals find a solution and trade him next offseason (ala Boomer Esiason). Not that I actually have evidence of that.
And yes, trades can't happen now. But they can happen once labor peace returns.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Evidence points everywhere and at at everything
Just as much to say we’re going to trade him, just as many say we’re not.
Got to love this time of year.
1st round draft wishes.
Bengals: Blaine Gabbert, Marcell Dareus or AJ Green!
Cavaliers: ANY PG AND SF DUO.
www.FearTheSword.com.
Ya know who might also enjoy a trip
to the Havana de El Norte? Why, that Ochocinco kid, that’s who! Wouldn’t our boy, Carson, enjoy the parting gift of a bosom traveling companion from here to Miami?
by IgnatiusJReilly on Apr 6, 2011 8:40 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
that... would.. be... AWESOME
Give pizza chants.
by 80%OFTHETIMEIMRIGHTEVERYTIME on Apr 6, 2011 11:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Said it already
Some time ago I posted CP9 has already been set up for a trade or a deal is done in principal awaiting CBA to end for finalization. Mike Brown is an attorney, can play poker with the best of ‘em and will play his hand just before the draft or the day of. Question is who’s he traded to…….Seattle, Miami, Arizona(my pic), San Fran, Tennessee or Minnesota?
why do you think that
If mike brown wouldn’t trade chad, why would he trade the only person he loves more than chad?
by JCompton41 on Apr 7, 2011 11:46 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Chad is
A minor player albeit a top WR for this team but a QB is a major foundation player to a team. So, MB would not establish a benchmark by caving to minor player’s requests for a trade, ala: Chad Johnson. Like I said above, MB is playing a tough poker hand here with CP9 by diverting attention to the trade as in “we will not trade him and let him retire”. I mean the easiest out for MB is to say “I’ve changed my mind for the betterment of the team and winning”. As far as other players pulling the same tactic, he will treat them like he did Chad Johnson. I really believe CP9, if not already traded in principle will be traded eventually.

by 



























