Preview Against The New York Jets: Five Positions And Players That Could Impact Cincinnati's Roster
On Friday Jason Garrison released his five things to look for against the Jets, which includes the offense scoring a touchdown, more Cedric Benson, the receivers against the Jets corners, Clint Boling and the overall concept of progress. It's a well-rounded list with core growth for this team to be competitive, at least offensively, during the 2011 season that's generating zero expectations.
That being said we've released our offensive portion of our roster locks so far during this year's preseason. The locks is a means to formulate a final roster prediction. As general praise can indicate some favoritism, we feel that the games are the best (though not only) indicator for players to make the team. Here are five positions that could impact the team's roster during Sunday night's game against the New York Jets.
| Third-String Quarterback |
One of the more meaningless positions on this team, the Bengals third string quarterback has never touched the field for a regular season game during the Marvin Lewis era. Sure Jordan Palmer was the third-string quarterback on the roster during his three games in 2008, but he was the backup quarterback in those games due to Carson Palmer's injury.
Still the Bengals need a third quarterback this year (because you never know) and the competition is centered between Jordan Palmer and Dan LeFevour. Based on Friday's performance, LeFevour should have a slight advantage if we were forced to suggest one. But that's only because LeFevour completed his lone pass attempt for seven yards whereas Palmer completed only one of four passes, including an interception
| Fifth And Sixth Wide Receiver |
Quan Cosby appears as a favorite to return as the team's punt returner. That being said we didn't lock him in for that fifth wide receiver position simply because he hasn't been as active. Cosby should make his preseason debut this Sunday against the New York Jets after fighting muscle soreness. If he can't go then Jamere Holland will return punts. Rookie Ryan Whalen, another receiver expected to be a primary special teams contributor, isn't expected to play Sunday.
While we still believe Cosby is a favorite for the fifth spot, he still needs to reclaim it and show that he's healthy. That sixth spot is even more wide open for Whalen, Holland, Landon Cox, Andrew Hawkins, Bart Johnson, Calvin Russell and John Standeford.
| Shape Of The Tight End |
What will be interesting from this point on is the competition between third-year tight end Chase Coffman and veteran tight end Bo Scaife. Coffman remains the team's top backup tight end, playing with the first team unit as the second tight end in double tight end formations.
Both should receive plenty of playing time this weekend against the Jets. Jermaine Gresham missed the entire week of practice and remains a game-time decision. If he can't go, who starts? Based on the depth chart, it should be Coffman but those charts are generally meaningless during the fluid preseason.
One thing we have to note here is the variable of undrafted free agent Colin Cochart. If Scaife remains unimpressive then we have to wonder if Cochart may challenge Scaife for a roster spot. In truth we feel that the chances of this happening are extreme, simply because Lewis may want to inject some veteran leadership into such a young offense making Cochart a leading candidate for the practice squad.
| Filling Out The Offensive Line |
Based on our locks this week, we have three offensive tackles (Andrew Whitworth, Andre Smith and Anthony Collins), three guards (Bobbie Williams, Clint Boling and Nate Livings) and one center (Kyle Cook) locked into the team's 2011 roster. Traditionally the Bengals have taken nine offensive linemen, which opens two spots.
As much as we hate to admit it, even though that the final two spots on the offensive line roster should be filled by versatile players, Dennis Roland appears as a favorite. Reggie Stephens is in the same boat as a backup to Kyle Cook because the team doesn't have a backup center if injury strikes Cook; though Boling has put in work at center during training camp, we'll like to see how that translates into game situations (something we might see Sunday night). A more long-term vision suggests that Cook will be an unrestricted free agent after this season, projecting the need to develop a center if he leaves -- which would be Stephens at this point.
Free agent signing Max Jean-Gilles could factor at some point, due to his status as a veteran free agent. If that's the case he'll have to beat out either Nate Livings, Roland or Reggie Stephens, unless the team decides to go with ten offensive linemen (which could create a competition between Jean-Gilles and Andrew Gardner). Yet based on his performance against Detroit, Jean-Gilles has a long way to go.
| Chris Pressley |
As we wrote on the subject, Pressley is as close of a lock for this roster as anyone. One of the reasons we didn't include him was simply the team's unorthodox history regarding the position. They choose Jeremi Johnson over Pressley and Fui Vakapuna in 2009, even though Johnson was overweight and out of shape when coming into camp. They didn't even bother taking a full back in 2010.
That being said, if he plays well on Friday then he's likely turning into our 18th lock for this offense.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
im looking for korey lindsey to play better
Maybe make the team
by JCompton41 on Aug 20, 2011 11:10 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Defense
Still putting those roster locks together.
Managing Editor at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Josh Kirkendall on Aug 20, 2011 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions
wouldn't mind if they kept jordan
some one else brought this up already, but it might be nice to have a quaterback on the sideline in daltons ear that has seen the afc north already.Might not make a huge difference but i don’t think it will hurt.
even though i like jordans personality
he is a horrible qb. i dont think dalton should take advice from someone with more completions to the other team than his own.
agree on jp
Our qb situation is pretty tenuous. If we get to te point where jordan is getting much pt we are in serious trouble.
by goffchile on Aug 20, 2011 11:46 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
meh
he’s never been able to see underneath coverage, so he’s not really a value as a game-ready backup. Besides, Gradkowski may not be as familiar with the AFC North, but you’d think the coaching staff would be able to give that kind of advice and scouting reports (assuming MB pays for that sort of thing).
Honestly, theres no way to know what we have in jp, he has a better arm than any qb we have, but gets no playing time or practice time, looks like we’re stuck watching dalton floaters for ints all season!
by ashunte23 on Aug 20, 2011 11:59 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Niot sure I understand how you can say that
He’s been a 3 Ed stringer almost s entire career and can’t even put up avg/above avg #‘s against 3 rd stringers in pre-season. What we have with Jordan is NOTHING OF VALUE on the FB field and a “favor” to his brother who just turned his back on our franchise. We should cut him and never look back. The reason he gets no playin or practice time is because he’s a terrible QB- IMO since the only reason he is here was bc of carson, we should have released him the same hour it was finally “official” that Carson was done
The Curse of Bo Jackson: Jan 13th,1991- present day
If Pressley doesn't make the roster I'll be mad.
We saw how the running game was with no FB for most of last year. Then they got Pressley back, and we saw what happened; there was at least one LB hitting the ground and hitting the ground hard on almost every play he was in.
I love me some Pressley, as does most everyone I know on CJ. He’s a hard worker, a pretty smart guy and a monstrous athlete.
Miguel Cairo is so last week.
if only they'd let a consensus of CJ members make their roster moves....
as does most everyone I know on CJ
+we’d still have J Jo
+we’d still have a quality LG
+we’d have draft picks for Carson
+etc…
haha, yeah but we'd also still have Matt Jones ...
we’d have Taylor Mays instead of Jermaine Gresham
and we’d be about 50 million over the cap because we would always vote ‘yes’ to every free agent on the market.
I think I’d rather have a GM … lol
the Bengals get a GM? Now you're just being crazy...
at least letting the CJ members vote for player acquisitions was realistic :-)
SIGN PRYOR
He has much more upside than Pamer or Lefevour. I think if we could mold him for 2yrs he would be ready to play. Worst case scenario put him in on some trick plays within the 10 where he can run it in. I don’t want to cause controversy with Dalton right off. But if in 2 yrs. he is ready to play QB a little competition in camp is never bad. What do you guys think? I think sign him if he looks good when his evaluated for the Draft. WHO DEY!
Even though he's likely
to face a long NFL suspension, I bet he goes between rounds 3 and 5. He’s a young knuckle head but talented.
Third-String Quarterback
in theory your third-string qb should NEVER make it onto the field during the season.
if he does make it onto the field, you’re likely battling Detroit to match their 0-16 record :-)
that being the case, your 3rd qb should ideally be a high upside guy (LeFevours) over a guy who is a subpar backup that knows the system but has no upside (Jordan).
so i’m hoping teh job is already Dan’s (unless they throw out a 5th or 6th round pick for Pryor and nab him from the supp draft).
i'm with you on this
Lefevour has so much more up side than JP5. He’s doesn’t have the arm JP5 has but he’s more mobile and appears to have better down field vision. Pryor will not be a good mix, to much gangster in him and not a team player.
by sofakingood on Aug 20, 2011 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions
LeFevour, if he ever puts it all together and reaches his ceiling, should be perfect for the WCO.
Miguel Cairo is so last week.
Pryor
I know it seems to be 80% against signing Pryor and 20% for signing prior on CJ, but how do the 80% of you pass on a guy who is 6’5", 232lbs and runs a 4.36 40 yard dash? He has played QB and WR while at OSU. He has done nothing but win his entire career and he is more polished in a pro-style offense than Cam Newton, who went #1 overall. Put Pryor in Auburns simplified, do what you want, offense and Pryor has similar numbers. Pryor played under center and in a shotgun, with a more complicated playbook, which makes him more NFL ready. Further, has anyone watched him play? This kid just makes plays. He dominated Oregon and was by far the most athletic player on the field no matter what team OSU played. We’re not talking about a 1 year wonder either, like Cam, Akili Smith, etc. He did it over 3 years.
This is the supplemental draft and we are not spending a #1 draft pick on the guy. He has number 1 talent that you can get with a 3 or 4 round pick. Project or not, passing on a guy with that much natural ability who has played 3 years of college ball is insane. He would provide a dimension and excitement with this organization that hasn’t been seen in awhile. Further, many clamored for Vick b/c of what he brings to the team. Pryor is bigger, stronger, faster and has had more success in college than Vick had.
My $.02

by 
























