Why The Bengals Could Call Free Agency A Success So Far
Free agency isn't meant to build championships. It never has been; otherwise teams like the Washington Redskins would have three Super Bowls already in the 21st century. Teams like the Dallas Cowboys would have at least one Super Bowl appearance since 1996. There's a reason many experts firmly grip the theory that you build championship teams through the draft, not free agency.
Many of the players available are largely available because their original teams didn't believe they were conducive towards the construction of a winning team; either over-valued worth, attitude, talent or threat to team chemistry. Granted there are the exceptions to the idea, in which a single player obtained through free agency has pushed a team into the realm of championship contender. Two of the more recent examples includes quarterback Drew Brees, who was signed by the New Orleans Saints in 2006. Yet it wasn't until his fourth season that the Saints won the Super Bowl. Defensive back Charles Woodson signed a seven-year deal worth $52.7 million with the Green Bay Packers in 2006. It wasn't until his fifth season that the Green Bay Packers won the Super Bowl.
Yet these examples aren't good examples. Reason being is that both teams also used free agency to find third-string tight ends, backup centers, special teams players that helped build the roster from the 40th-53rd spot; areas that are exponentially better for teams that annually make championship runs. The Pittsburgh Steelers and New England Patriots won five of the previous ten Super Bowls. Neither team is known for signing big-time free agents, choosing to build their rosters in-house with several free agent signings to complete the roster.
Now one could argue that the Bengals in free agency isn't a success because they're largely signing players as a response to issues outside of their control. Nate Clements wasn't signed to add depth at cornerback. He was signed as a measured response to replace the departed Johnathan Joseph. Keith Rivers had wrist surgery and Cincinnati signed the combination of Thomas Howard and Brandon Johnson. Roddrick Muckelroy suffered a season-ending injury and soon after, the Bengals signed outside linebacker Manny Lawson.
We also fully acknowledge that free agency could, and maybe should, be argued as a success. Even though their reacting to losing players, they are adding depth in the meantime. Since Keith Rivers got hurt, weakside linebacker improved with two quality players. Muckelroy's injury opened the door for a productive veteran at strongside linebacker. Signing Clements makes the Bengals immediately better, even if Joseph would have stayed. Max Jean-Gilles is a veteran backup guard that could be a future starters and Bo Scaife adds an element of veteran leadership to a position that's young and inexperienced.
The Bengals will react to available players on the market, deciding if it helps bolster the overall roster on this team. Signing backup players is just as critical as starters. On any given player you could lose a key starter for the rest of the season with a significant injury. Now your backups suddenly become starters. And for guys with a history of injuries like Jermaine Gresham, or Chase Coffman, having an insurance policy like Bo Scaife definitely helps the overall product of this roster. And that is what free agency is about.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Whether it works or it doesn't
At least this time the Bengals seem to have a strategy. They’ve got veterans in on short-term contracts to get them to prove that they’re worth a longer-term deal down the stretch. No signing in this free agency period has hurt the roster, in fairness.
Would like to see Hall, Simpson and a few others now being committed for the long haul rather than allowing another TJ/JJo bidding war happen again – a situation which we all know the Bengals will always come off second best.
in fairness
They attempted to get J Joe under contract earlier. he refused to even discuss it.
"Next season will be better" circa 1990
Twitter @Rcklarue
Truthfully, before Free Agency, I was hoping that we simply didn't end up with pick #1 next draft...
But now… I am filled with hope. Do I think this is a Superbowl team? No. Do I think this team is surprisingly deep and stocked with a lot more potential than it was a month ago? Oh yea. What really shocks me is that even though this team is full of flaws (Inexperienced passing game, No game changer RB, Question marks in the secondary, and a curious pass rush) I still hold hope that this team could win a lot more games than one would think, and has an outside shot at the playoffs. Who knew?
Though, I still wouldn’t mind a gamechanger in the secondary (Damn you whitner), and a smash mouth FB (though they aren’t heavily utilized in the WC offense) I really think this team is surprisingly set and stocked.
by In Marvin I Trust on Aug 5, 2011 5:23 PM EDT reply actions
I have to disagree that the Bengals free agency has been a success...
I mean, its great we’re rebuilding for the future… but we still lost our starting QB & maybe our best corner, haven’t signed a S (though I love the trade for Nelson last year), and hired back a guy who was arrested twice in the past 6 months. I do like that we’ve turned lemons into lemonade with our linebacking core, and we had another good draft… but not trading Carson is an F, Losing JJoe and signing Clements is probably a C. The rest are all decent pickups… so in the long run the FA period might turn out well, but I don’t think I’d call it a success.
Can't Grade Free Agency
I don’t think you can give a grade to this year’s Free Agency and you also can’t say where or what will happen to Carson Palmer. The Bengal don’t treat there fan like they are Ice Cream Vendor but they do a good job @ two thing’s #1,letting go of players that are over the Hill,and Free agency,#3 they are starting to get better @ drafting.
Good perspective Josh...
I really think this team is going to be O.K. this year, and here is why…………
Defense:
If there is anyone I trust to be competent in this organization it is Mike Zimmer. If the defense gets back into top five form we will always be in games. We still haven’t seen what Gibril Wilson and Robert Sands bring to the table, so we might be better off than we think at the safety position. We are pretty solid in the front seven.
Offense:
Gruden is calling the plays not Bratkowski, so that has got to be worth a couple of wins right there. If they can run the ball successfully, and we can limit mistakes from the quarterback, then we will always have a chance to win. This is going to have to be a ball control offense, so the defense isn’t on the field the whole game. We are only going to go as far as the O-Line will take us on offense. We have shown in the past that we can run the ball successfully, so all we really need is an adequate passing game, and we have a stable of young talented receivers.
This is a 4 win team
if they’re lucky
by occams_tiger_teeth on Aug 6, 2011 1:59 AM EDT reply actions
I hope
I feel good about this team, unfortunately with the world supposed to end in 2012 I have to hope they gel quickly. lol
"Next season will be better" circa 1990
Twitter @Rcklarue

by 



























