Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: So Let's Talk About Hulk Too, I Suppose

Bengals Made The Right Call Going For It On Fourth Down

The clock was ticking and the Cincinnati Bengals were on the verge of an explosive win, led by the rookie duo of domination between the special talent of A.J. Green and cool Red, the general in training surgically tearing apart the opposing defense in the second half. With 3:09 left in the final period, down by two points on fourth down, the Bengals were forced into a decision; should they go for it or attempt a 53-yard field goal attempt?

Cincinnati choose to go for it and unlike the feelings of my cowriter, it was the absolute right call. Now it's sort of a meaningless point of view, simply because when something doesn't work, the other choice that wasn't chosen must have been the right one. If Nugent misses the 53-yard field goal, do the same amount of fans think they should have gone for it?

While you could argue that the play-call itself was a bad one, banking too much on a defensive end's reaction rather than something simpler, the Bengals made the right call going for it on fourth-and-one.

And I have four reasons why.

Star-divide

+ Bengals had offensive momentum. Not two possessions before had Red surgically placed a well thrown pass to wide receiver Jerome Simpson in perfect stride, picking up 84 yards. Aware of Green's tremendous talent differential over the players defending him, two plays later, Red purposely threw a jump pass into Green's hands, who practically floated momentarily to get his left toe in-bounds for the touchdown. That's the type of talent, fully on display Sunday, this offense can use to pick up one measly yard.

This offense wasn't just moving. They were on a roll, with enough momentum that it seemed that they could score from any spot on the field. Dalton posted 280 yards passing in the second half and even the rushing offense was averaging over four yards per carry in the fourth quarter.

Taking advantage of that would have caused a domino effect that could have assure a better chance to win the game. Granted they didn't. While Robert Ayers didn't play off the fake during Jay Gruden's call to roll Dalton out, you could argue that it wasn't so much the execution as it was the call, which was a bigger risk than the actual decision to go for it.

It's one yard, though. One measly yard.

We're not talking about a first half offense that failed to convert three consecutive three-and-one attempts. We're talking about an offense that was averaging 6.9 yards per play. One yard. Did anyone think that the momentum the team was surfing at the time, that they couldn't pick up one yard? This offense posted five plays of 22 yards or more in the second half alone.

How couldn't Marvin Lewis and Gruden feel confident that their young enthusiastic players wouldn't pick up one yard during an explosive second half?

+ Conversion Seriously Reduces Another Broncos Possession. Consider for a moment that if the Bengals converted that fourth down, the offense has control for another set of downs. That's three more minutes the offense can play with to milk the clock. Even if they were choosing to go conservative for an eventual Mike Nugent field goal, the team can get closer and by the time they attempt the kick, a big chuck of whatever time remained in the fourth quarter is gone.

+ No Guarantee They'd Get It Back Without Another Deficit. Denver did two things against the Bengals on Sunday. They ran the ball well and scored on big plays. Even if the Bengals attempted a field goal from 53 yards out and converted, Denver now has time to milk the clock and kick a game-winning field goal.

Denver might not be New England on offense, but Denver produced two scoring plays of 25 yards or more. And three minutes is plenty of time to move downfield, kill the clock for their own game-winning field goal.

+ A 53-Yard Field Goal Is No Guarantee. And finally, we're assuming that a 53-yard field goal is a sure-thing, even though it was being played with an elevation of over 5,000 feet. Hell, we know that Mike Nugent has the leg to make that distance at Paul Brown Stadium, much less needing that thin Denver air. However Nugent has only converted 38.5% of all 50-yard field goal attempts in his career. So the kick wasn't anymore of a sure-thing than going for it on fourth down.

As one can only imagine, his percentage significantly improves the closer he gets, making 67.7% of his field goals between 40-49. Converting on the fourth down assures a significantly higher chance to kick and convert a game-winning field goal.

+ Hindsight and all of that. It just ended up not working out and the Bengals lost going for it. Even if they had gone for it, they still need a good snap and hold and the best line drive Nugent could offer. Sure, it's makeable for Nugent -- he's done it 38.5% of the time.

Comment 28 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Nugent

has a lot of range and is very accurate, plus the denver air! nugent had this, he’s the type of kicker that can make these fg’s, that’s why we have him and not shayne graham. You have to trust your kicker.

by JDT1418 on Sep 19, 2011 11:33 PM EDT reply actions  

Even in Denver, a 53-yarder is no gimme

I fully expected Marvin to go for the FG. But going for it was the right call. If they want to be a team that is supposedly built to run the ball, they can’t be afraid to go for it on the opponent’s side of the field late in the game when all they need is one yard.

Props to Denver for stuffing the play. But I like that the Bengals had the balls to go for it.

"The only thing we have to fear is... Mike Brown himself."

by DrainBamage on Sep 20, 2011 9:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thought same thing here........

I wanted them to pick it up, run the clock down and either score 6 or run the clock down as far as possible and then kick the 3. We are supposed to be able to get a yard with Benson and our power running game.

by The Van Buren Boys on Sep 20, 2011 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

We are supposed to be able to get a yard with Benson and our power running game.

agreed. sadly vs. Denver they had showed all game that they couldn’t

by ephram on Sep 20, 2011 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree here

 making this first down is the practical equivalent of a death blow. kicking a field goal with three minutes and giving your team a one point lead is far from a sure thing. I remember this game last season…

by keithster on Sep 19, 2011 11:43 PM EDT reply actions  

I agree

but that was a very poorly designed play.

by occams_tiger_teeth on Sep 19, 2011 11:49 PM EDT reply actions  

Your guy was open on that play...

… Ayers just happened to make the best play of his career there.

Maya: "What are your first impressions of Denver?"
Mozgov: "I must break you..."

by margabelle on Sep 19, 2011 11:56 PM EDT reply actions  

youve got that right

jeezus…lawrence taylor decided to come play for that down.

by ddbumpus on Sep 20, 2011 12:05 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I do not agree.

Rather than put this on Jason’s post, I’ll put it here.

Nugent was three for three. He could have made that FG no problems. Great weather, no wind to speak of. It would have given us the lead and made the Broncos have to fight uphill instead of us.

Instead, we don’t make the 1 lousy yard. We turn the ball over in good field position anyways.

Now, if we stick to Giggle’s decision to go for it, why didn’t Brian Leonard get the pill? He was mysteriously absent from this game, and didn’t get one single handoff for the many short yardage must have downs? What the hell is that all about?

Sure. Everyone has a plan, until they get punched in the mouth - Mike Tyson

by UpStateMike on Sep 20, 2011 1:25 AM EDT reply actions  

I agree with the call to go for it...

And hindsight is a #$&% =)! However, line up 3 wide with gresham near the line and leonard inthe backfield… Got to spread the D out! The Bengals were not moving the ball in a goalline formation! Theit best offense comes out of 3 wide formations with Dalton in the shotgun! That play the Bengals ran looked awful similar to that play the steelers ran when ward got rocked a week ago!

"Men often become what they believe themselves to be. If I believe I cannot do something, it makes me incapable of doing it. But when I believe I can, I then acquire the ability to do it even if I didn't have it in the beginning."

by Dwight Carter on Sep 20, 2011 3:19 AM EDT reply actions  

I think if you're trailing in the game, you got to kick it...

you got to take the chance that’s presented to you to get ahead …and then trust in your defense to keep Denver from scoring again.

Nugent nailed one from 55 in the pre-season which looked like it travelled more than 60, and at altitude, there’s no doubt he has the leg.

All hindsight now. Had the Bengals converted some third downs in the first quarter, we probably wouldn’t need this thread and we’d be lauding the defense getting the Broncos to go three and out in their last two possessions at home with the game on the line in the fourth quarter.

If anything, the Bengals learned that there is life after Chad and Carson. And if knowing that means taking a loss, then if given the choice, I’m happy to take it on the road against a team outside of the division.

by wiseking on Sep 20, 2011 4:15 AM EDT reply actions  

life after Chad and Carson? Won't they be upset!

Sure. Everyone has a plan, until they get punched in the mouth - Mike Tyson

by UpStateMike on Sep 20, 2011 4:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

Don't particularly care what they think

Things move on. Glad the Bengals only took two weeks to move on.

by wiseking on Sep 20, 2011 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Does going for it on 4th and 1...

…guarantee they will score later in the drive? What if they fumbled it away? What if Dalton threw his first interception of the day? There is no guarantee they would have even gotten the opportunity to kick another field goal had they picked up the first down. Just kick the damn ball!

And Josh, what are Nugents numbers from 50+ for the BENGALS? I don’t really care what he has done elsewhere in his career, he is better than that from 50 since joining the Bengals. Too many factors pointed to GOING FOR IT…especially their abysmal 3rd down conversion rate (did they have ONE all day?).

And now I officially HATE Marvin Lewis…

by WhoDeyEveryDay on Sep 20, 2011 7:59 AM EDT reply actions  

RE:
Nugents numbers from 50+ for the BENGALS?

50%

I don’t really care what he has done elsewhere in his career

Be that as it may, he’s still converting only 38% of his 50-yard field goals whether you care or not. That doesn’t change a thing.

Managing Editor at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.

by Josh Kirkendall on Sep 20, 2011 9:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

Loser's

You play to win the game!!!
I say kicking the field goal was the only choice,50/50 we win the game
Or we can pass for 1 yard,60% we get a completion
If you have he nutz tovery go for it on 4th and 1,then have the nutz to run it and live with the results,Marv’s just not a very smart coach,period

"A team is more than a group of individuals,its a group of individuals that come together to make a team"

by keithp on Sep 20, 2011 8:49 AM EDT reply actions  

+1 the MATH says kick the ball

Nugent was 50% likely to make the kick.

The Bengals were 60% likely to make the 1st down, but then let’s say they go for a a shorter FG which is a 70% likelyhood.
60% x 70% = 42%

50% > 42%
therefore, kick the ball

by ephram on Sep 20, 2011 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

No they didnt

They should have gone for the field goal. Stupid call in my opinion and I always want marvin to go for it on fourth down. You have a kicker that can make this field goal so I don’t understand why you don’t let him kick the damn field goal

by Diesel2405 on Sep 20, 2011 8:58 AM EDT reply actions  

You’re down by 2 points (so a FG gives you the lead)
You have a long FG kicker (we have Nugent, not Graham)
You are in the thin air (it doesn’t get any easier than in Denver in that perfect weather)
You kick the long FG and take the lead (if you’re trying to win)

You don’t play the game to prove you can make a 4th and 1 conversion….you play the game to score more points than the opponent. And you score more points by kicking the FG and taking a late lead in the 4th quarter.
 
 

+ Bengals had offensive momentum

Yes, that momentum had put them into FG range to take the lead. You don’t piss that away by passing up on the scoring opportunity that the momentum had brought you.

+ Conversion Seriously Reduces Another Broncos Possession

But there is no guarantee that a Conversion leads to a score. What we need is a SCORE, not a Conversion. What if we throw an INT or fumble the ball away, or get a penalty that pushes them further away? What if we get 10 yards closer and miss the FG – now we have no time left to get the ball back and try to score again.

+ No Guarantee They’d Get It Back Without Another Deficit.

But if you don’t make the conversion, and Denver scores again…now you’re down by 2 scores. I’d rather be down 1 score than 2 scores in the waning minutes of the 4th quarter.

+ A 53-Yard Field Goal Is No Guarantee.

It’s more of a guarantee than the Bengals gaining 1 yard on 4th and 1.
Also, Nugent was 2 for 4 from 50 in 2010 (including one in the rain in Carolina)

You don’t bring in Nugent not to use him in that situation. It’s like drafting a great pass rusher and then not using him. Oh wait, they did that. Sorry, I forgot about Dunlap. I guess the Bengals do like to bring in people who are good at certain things and then not use them in those situations :-)

by ephram on Sep 20, 2011 9:44 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

RE:
Yes, that momentum had put them into FG range to take the lead

You’re assuming he makes the kick; something he hasn’t done 61% of the time in his career.

What if we get 10 yards closer and miss the FG

So why the hell would you kick from the 50 if you conjecture he’ll miss from the 40, where his chances of conversion drops by nearly 20%?

But if you don’t make the conversion, and Denver scores again…now you’re down by 2 scores

What difference does that make? You’ve lost in both scenarios. Bengals score a TD and you force them to score a TD, not a chip shot field goal in that thin Denver air, as you point out is a very easy thing to do.

I’d rather be down 1 score than 2 scores in the waning minutes of the 4th quarter.

What’s to assume that Denver actually leaves you ANY time?

Managing Editor at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.

by Josh Kirkendall on Sep 20, 2011 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

something he hasn’t done 61% of the time in his career.

Personally i don’t care if he’s a 100% or a 10% career kicker.
Every season is independent. What has he shown lately? Lately he’s 2 for 4 in 2010 and hit a 50 yarder in 2011 preseason. I’ll take the 50% odds.

So why the hell would you kick from the 50 if you conjecture he’ll miss from the 40

The point being a contingency plan. If he misses the 50, we have time left. If he misses from the 40 – game over. Although I trust him to hit from both distances.

What’s to assume that Denver actually leaves you ANY time?

I’m going to count on my defense to stop a team that is running a backup RB and playing with a 3rd string WR & Tim Tebow split wide. I trust our defense vs. that more than i trust our young offense at this point in the season.

Based on his recent Bengal results, i see him with a 50% chance of making the FG from 50 yards.

I see them with maybe a 60% chance of converting a 4th and 1.
And then you still have to kick a FG that is maybe only 70% successful.

The odds of making the 1st down, and then making a 40 yard FG is 60% x 70% = 42%
The odds of making a 50 yard FG is 50% 50% > 42%

Isn’t sports great? We can discuss our views so passionately for something that is so meaningless in the grand scheme of things, even when there is no right answer.

It’s like arguing Hank Arron vs. Barry Bonds or Ginger vs. Mary Ann or Peanut Butter vs. Chocolate or original Star Wars vs. Star Wars remakes…. :-)

by ephram on Sep 20, 2011 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd give Nooge 85% to make it in those conditions

but I would still go for it. If he misses you shorten the field for the Broncoes, if they make three you force your rookie QB to come down and score a TD. with way under two minutes left to play. and no time outs.

by keithster on Sep 20, 2011 2:30 PM EDT reply actions  

1-11

Kick the FG…Nuff said

by ASco05 on Sep 20, 2011 3:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Cincinnati Bengals.

Editor-In Chief

Cj_small Josh Kirkendall

Editor/Managing Editor

Rudiblanket_small Anthony Cosenza

5255_133614603784_666578784_2414703_1976100_n_small Jason Garrison

Authors

Photo_3_small BeerRun

010511170110_small Joe Goodberry

40297_422933299865_509514865_4658259_6466915_n_small Ryan Harper

Small Brennen Warner

Sb_nation_small Jack Cassidy

580551_10150822857707018_613867017_11694254_1239726425_n_small Nick_Crago

Img_0783_small Mike Fightmaster

Moderators

Nfl palewook

680764146_0eac16fabd_small 80%OFTHETIMEIMRIGHTEVERYTIME

Tawky_tawny_small UpStateMike

Joeb698_86e260_small joeb69

Bengals_stamp_by_jamaal10_small Doc Scratch