Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: How NBA Draft Lottery Results Affect Prospects' High Hopes

Round Table: Cedric Benson, The Rushing Offense And The Offensive Line

HOUSTON, TX - JANUARY 07:  (L-R) Running back Cedric Benson #32 and quarterback Andy Dalton #14 celebrate after Benson scores on a one-yard touchdown run in the first quarter while taking on the Houston Texans in their 2012 AFC Wild Card Playoff game at Reliant Stadium on January 7, 2012 in Houston, Texas.  (Photo by Jamie Squire/Getty Images)

Josh and Jason sat down for another Bengals round table on Monday to discuss Cedric Benson's production (or lack there of), the offensive line and offensive line coach Paul Alexander's future.

Josh: Did you know that 21.3% of Benson's production in 2011 was against the Cleveland Browns?

Star-divide

Jason: He needs to go

Josh: The entire rushing offense needs revision. I think Benson does have a point, the Bengals didn't take the rushing game seriously. While his complaint was mostly selfish, one has to think that there's a lot of truth to that.

Jason: Well the offensive line didn't do any favors for him but Benson also lacks the ability to make plays on his own and he is completely ineffective in the passing game. The offensive line needs to be fixed but even if it was they need a new running back. His attitude, I think, is a detriment to the team at this point.

Josh: True. But think of it this way. When you identify the running back and offensive line as a problem in the rushing offense, don't you think that it has to do with coaching?

Jason: I think it has to do with coaching as well as the ability of the players on the offensive line. A huge problem is the play of Mike McGlynn/Bobbie Williams/Clint Boling and Nate Livings. I just don't think the Bengals guards, as they are right now, are good enough to be productive.

Josh: I'd be surprised if the team doesn't make every effort to bring Williams back though. He was rated as the team's best rush blocker by Pro Football Focus. Livings and McGlynn can go.

Jason: I wouldn't be surprised either. His age worries me a little but that's trumped by his leadership ability and his locker room presence. I think a one-year deal with him would be fine, but they need a new left guard badly. Re-signing Williams could even be a good thing for Clint Boling. A year to sit behind Williams could be what he needs to get better if that's going to happen.

Josh: Let's not forget about Otis Hudson either. He was listed as the team's backup right guard before injury ended the prospects of playing in 2011.

Jason: Yeah, Hudson could produce as well. I think that Kyle Cook is a good center but his play suffers with two subpar guards on either side of him. In fact, I would go as far to say that having two bad guards hurts Andrew Whitworth's and Andre Smith's production too.

Josh: True. But I have another theory. Cincinnati's passing game offered no threat, besides A.J. Green. Were opposing defenses really that worried about Jerome Simpson, Jermaine Gresham or whomever they put in the slot? Stacking the line, stuffing gaps from a compact defense hurt the Bengals rushing game, all because the Bengals passing game, though infant in many regards in terms of age in the NFL.

Jason: That could have a lot to do with it as well. All I can think about though is the first game against Baltimore. When the Bengals needed to score in the red zone, Andy Dalton had zero time to do anything because the offensive line couldn't stop a three-man rush. That's the kind of thing that needs to be fixed before 2012. I want a 2005-style offensive line again.

Josh: Good luck with that. There were two first rounders, two second rounders and Rich Braham, one of the best centers this team has seen in nearly three decades.

Jason: Yeah. Hopefully the Bengals come to the realization that teams are built from the line out. Plus, I know how you love the linemen.

Josh: What I hate is the team's inability to target their better players. No way they should have ever allowed Nate Livings to replace Evan Mathis in 2009. Anthony Collins is our new Mathis, in terms of being screwed over.

Jason: Yeah, I would love it if they re-signed him but I know it's not going to happen. However, picture this: the Bengals move big Andre to right guard and Collins plays right tackle. I know it will never happen and moving Smith is virtually impossible right now, but it's a sexy idea.

Josh: It's a fun idea to conjure up, no doubt. But it's also an idea that Paul Alexander has shot down dating back to last year. And there's no reason to believe that the transition would be successful in the first place.

Jason: Do you think that Paul Alexander needs the boot?

Josh: That's a loaded question because I don't think he's THE problem with this team's rushing offense. Talent is week at guards, Benson struggled all year to break free and the offense was so focused around Andy Dalton and A.J. Green. And I doubt that the team will give the boot to their assistant head coach, who coached the offensive line to only allowed 25 sacks this year -- despite that most passing plays were three-step drops to get teh football out of Dalton's hands quickly.

Jason: It's something that a lot of people have been calling for. I don't think you can pick the offense's troubles on him either, though.

Josh: If the Bengals listened to fans, they'd be rebuilding this team's coaching staff and personnel after every season.

Comment 62 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Paul alexander

is the reason we have nate livings and not pro bowler evan mathis…

isnt that enough reason? he actually thinks livings is good

by Bengalsfan024 on Jan 16, 2012 2:40 PM EST reply actions  

And if the goal is the best 5 linemen start why is collins not playing at all?

tell me he couldnt have played LG like whit did his rookie year? or RG after bobby went down

by Bengalsfan024 on Jan 16, 2012 2:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Paul has to be blamed too.........

He’s the OL coach. He puts who he think should play out on the field. How many GOOD Gs have we let go. Its time for him to go to me. If he thinks Livings is good enough to start then that tells me something right there.

by i am will on Jan 16, 2012 3:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, the Mathis thing still pisses me off

And they are right we are going to do the same thing with Collins, which pisses me off even more!!!!!

by biggie22 on Jan 16, 2012 3:44 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't see how anyone can defend Alexander

All of us were screaming for Mathis to start instead of Livings last year. All of us were screaming for Collins to start instead of Smith & Roland. None of that happened, and now that Mathis is on another team he finally got the chance to hold the starting job. In that massively increased playing time he proved to be one of the best guards in the NFL. Did that surprise anyone at all on this board? It didn’t at ProFootballFocus, I tell you that.

Same thing with Collins. Whit is the only guy on the line better than Collins, yet he’s buried on the depth chart. Dennis Roland gets as many snaps as Collins does, maybe more. That is just shameful. Next year he’ll be starting for someone and we’ll be the fools again. This is all on Alexander.

by indesignkat on Jan 16, 2012 3:44 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

its hard to defend alexander at this point

and its not like we’re the torch wielding mob annually. at times some of us are, but rarely does the whole mass of bengals fans attack a player or coach. bratt, ok we did. brown, at times we have. alexander? in his 18 years here? in the past 3 years that alexander has started to wear on most bengals fans.

"the bengals are not a west of the 104 longitude team."

by palewook on Jan 16, 2012 4:42 PM EST up reply actions  

The problem is his mistake in judging talent have really cost us big time

Evan Mathis is a prime example and Anthony Collins is about to another one. They are crazy if they do not lock up Collins long term not to mention the fact it will only help us and give us leverage next year when we have to nogiate with smith.

by biggie22 on Jan 16, 2012 4:48 PM EST up reply actions  

I think we are going to be sorry if we don't find a way to get Collins in there.

Yes, we need to upgrade the O-line, and we need a new running back, but that guy has earned a spot in my opinion. We also need to extend Andre and we need to do it now. It would take so much pressure off of Andy to have a good O-line and a good RB. Ced wasn’t downright awful during his time here, but he wasn’t feared whatsoever by opposing defenses. Get a running back who is feared, and it opens up the passing game more. It will also help having Shipley back, as long as he is the same.

Oh, I also would bring Bobbie back for at least one more season. That may be me being selfish, as he is one of my faves. :)

by Ben-GAL on Jan 16, 2012 2:42 PM EST reply actions  

Here is another thing, I think when people see Benson in the backfield...

95% or greater, it is going to be a running play. Benson does not receive the ball well, in fact, he looks terrified everytime the ball is thrown his way. Yes, an improved offensive line would also help, but Benson does not break enough tackles or make plays. Ahmad Bradshaw a couple of times yesterday was hit behind the line of scrimmage and managed to fight off the first tackler, run from one sideline to another and still gain 20+ yards. In all honesty, do you see Cedric doing something like that, or even remotely close?

by pemci on Jan 16, 2012 3:00 PM EST reply actions  

As for Paul Alexander.....

let me be blunt about this: HE NEEDS TO GO!

I think we need new blood and a new vision for our offensive line. This guy has been the line coach for 19 years now. If he was any good, you would think other teams would have noticed him. Look at Tom Cable, he was an offensive line coach, and see how his career has progressed, this guy has been the offensive line coach for 18 years now, it is time for a change….

by pemci on Jan 16, 2012 3:04 PM EST reply actions  

Eh

Its hard to say they didn’t take the rushing game seriously when we had a rookie qb and rookie wr. You’d think it was essential.

by Cincinnati222 on Jan 16, 2012 3:06 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Especially with a Rookie QB, WR and OC....

You would think our RB would have excelled more than they did. Yeah, he got his 1,000 yards rushing, but his two big games were against the Browns, and he almost cost us the game against the Cardinals with his 2 fumbles deep in our end. I think they took the running game seriously, up until they realized that Benson just did not have it. Nor was he thrilled with Scott/Leonard/Peerman getting carries. As Gruden said, we need to a team and not be worried about how many touches a single individual gets.

by pemci on Jan 16, 2012 3:13 PM EST up reply actions  

i think the saints have the best offensive model

all three backs split carries and sproles gets the majority of passes. The have an all pro TE and big WRs. Not to mention one of the best lines in the leage and a top 5 QB. We need to model ourselves after the saints O because I think thats were the league evovling too.

AMAS

by AMAS85 on Jan 16, 2012 3:18 PM EST up reply actions  

that would make Richardson the first piece of the puzzle to do that

he is like ray rice 2.0 lol just think of all the drives we could have extended with an option out of the backfield….. not to mention, the open zones that could be opened up for the TE and slot receivers

AMAS

by AMAS85 on Jan 16, 2012 3:24 PM EST up reply actions  

That would be awesome!

Gresham is not used enough, but he might put up numbers like Jimmy Graham, and with a slew of wideouts, that could be scary…

by pemci on Jan 16, 2012 3:29 PM EST up reply actions  

yea that was the enigma of the year

how to get both Gresham and Green involved in the game plan to where both could have big games. There seems to be a problem with getting both players the ball enough to where they both can have a positive impact but once the coaches figure it out. We will have a pretty leathal combination. Plus a receiving threat out of the back field would really put a lot of defenses in a binde.

AMAS

by AMAS85 on Jan 16, 2012 3:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Exactly! Teams know with Benson in the backfield

more than likely, they are going to run, he does not scare any team as a receiving threat out of the backfield. You get someone who teams have to respect catching the ball from the backfield, it opens up the TE’s and WR’s even more…

by pemci on Jan 16, 2012 3:43 PM EST up reply actions  

i've seen teams give benson room to catch in the flats

defensive cords didn’t seem to bother with guarding against benson’s hands (ever).

"the bengals are not a west of the 104 longitude team."

by palewook on Jan 16, 2012 4:39 PM EST up reply actions  

in regards to being like the saints

let me add in, either the packers or patriots too. IMO, they are the only 3 teams who have immediately altered their offensive scheme to take advantage of the new defensive limitations/rule changes. You no longer have to be scared to cross the middle of the field…you see the pats, saints and GB all take advantage w/their TE’s because of this and it opens up their entire offense….we have that type of TE on our team, now lets just hope we start to use him like he should be used.

The Curse of Bo Jackson: Jan 13th,1991- present day

by TruWhoDey on Jan 16, 2012 3:48 PM EST up reply actions  

How many drives started with 2 Benson runs for a total of 4 yards or less?

Screw Benson. He’s a selfish prick who is always among the lowest in the league in yards per carry and carries per TD. He doesn’t convert short yardage, doesn’t get into the endzone more than 5 or 6 times per year, and gets no yards after contact. Despite getting a huge number of carries, he bitches about the offense not revolving around him. He’s a tumor on the ass of the organization and needs to be excised.

by indesignkat on Jan 16, 2012 3:46 PM EST up reply actions  

most of them..

"the bengals are not a west of the 104 longitude team."

by palewook on Jan 16, 2012 4:37 PM EST up reply actions  

they took it seriously

at least till they figured out benson couldnt get it done then they looked elsewhere

by Bengalsfan024 on Jan 16, 2012 4:01 PM EST up reply actions  

In 2009: Benson had 301 carries for 1251 yards, which came out to an average of 4.2 yards per carry and an average of 96.2 yards per game.

in 2010: Benson had 321 carries for 1111 yards, which came out to an average of 3.5 yards per carry and an average of 69.4 yards per game.

In 2011: Benson had 273 carries (he was suspended for a game) for 1067 yards, which came out to an average of 3.9 yards per carry and an average of 71.1 yards per game…..

by pemci on Jan 16, 2012 4:08 PM EST up reply actions  

we had gresham all season

not buying cincy had no offensive weapons but green for receptions.

"the bengals are not a west of the 104 longitude team."

by palewook on Jan 16, 2012 4:38 PM EST up reply actions  

How to Gameplan The Bengals

Do you stop a running back that that cant run outside the tackles? Can Benson turn the corner? Will our line be able to block at the next level with our current blockers?
Do you take Benson out of the game and Dare Dalton to Lose the Game!

Dalton needs a running game. Who can QB in the NFL without a running game?
Only the elite! Andy needs help! Maybe Andy can turn into a Drew Brees someday.

Opponnets dare Andy to lose the game because our running game is in shambles.

by Chili Dog on Jan 16, 2012 3:31 PM EST reply actions  

Exactly.

No team feared our running game whatsoever.

by Ben-GAL on Jan 16, 2012 3:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Took the words out of my fingers

"Pawtucket Patriot Beer. If you drink it, hot women will have sex in your backyard."

by Evil Monkey on Jan 16, 2012 3:35 PM EST up reply actions  

To true!

Only the Browns were scared of our running game….no one else was even slightly initmidated….

by pemci on Jan 16, 2012 3:41 PM EST up reply actions  

we definatly need a back that can finish!

to many times where Benson got caught from behind or stopped short of the first down or goal line.

AMAS

by AMAS85 on Jan 16, 2012 3:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah that drove me crazy

As soon as I saw it was 3rd short, I was like oh no, were going to get stuffed. That was really one of the biggest issues this entire season if you really look back and see how many drives that could have easily been extended

by biggie22 on Jan 16, 2012 3:42 PM EST up reply actions  

3rd and one, with Benson being a "power" back...it

should be 75% or better, not under 50%. That was a huge disappointment for me as well. Bring in Peerman, Leonard - Heck! ANYONE, but Benson…..

by pemci on Jan 16, 2012 3:46 PM EST up reply actions  

That is pathetic. No excuses for that.

You can’t find a way to get a yard or less??? I don’t care who your O-line is, that us inexcusable. He just didn’t have that want to.

by Ben-GAL on Jan 16, 2012 3:49 PM EST up reply actions  

In my opinion;

I thought he went down to easy after initial contact. I agree, no excuse for not picking up 1 yard.

by pemci on Jan 16, 2012 3:51 PM EST up reply actions  

And normally on 2nd and a yard I'd be like take a shot down field, especially with us having AJ out there

But not this year, I just wanted them to get the 1rst down because I knew if it to 3rd and short we would more than likely get stuffed

by biggie22 on Jan 16, 2012 3:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Drew Brees would be considered an elite QB...

he lost this past weekend and he did not have a running game. However, guess who did have a running game and won? Alex Smith!

Not having a running game can get you by in the regular season, but in the playoffs, not having a running game means leaving early.

Brady does not have much of a running game, so it will be interesting to see what the rat-birds will do against them this weekend. Whereas, the Ravens have Ray Rice, 49ers have Frank Gore and the Giants have Bradshaw/Jacobs (although, I think teams fear Bradhaw more than they do Jacobs)…

by pemci on Jan 16, 2012 3:37 PM EST up reply actions  

meh, i get your point

but turnovers killed the saints…..and the packers for that matter, not the lack of a true running game.

The Curse of Bo Jackson: Jan 13th,1991- present day

by TruWhoDey on Jan 16, 2012 3:50 PM EST up reply actions  

I only saw a little bit of the Packers game yesterday, but I did see the Saints/49ers...

I think part of those turnovers (not the muffed returns) were due to Brees having to air it out more because Ivory could not get the yards, Pierre Thomas had been knocked out of the game, and Darren Sproles is not much of a rushing threat, he is more of a receiving threat out of the backfield.

by pemci on Jan 16, 2012 3:54 PM EST up reply actions  

The Saints are a pass-first team

If they throw the ball 45 times, that’s not an indication the RBs weren’t getting it done, it’s just means that it was Sunday. Their RBs are real playmakers, and the idea that Sproles isn’t a rushing threat is simply false.

by indesignkat on Jan 16, 2012 6:31 PM EST up reply actions  

They just have more players that they can go to

The Saints finished 6th in the league in rushing. You wouldn’t think that because they have 4 different backs that get it done for them based on the situation. Thats called variety and that puts pressure on the defense.

by EPK1979 on Jan 17, 2012 12:45 AM EST up reply actions  

Time for a change on the OL and OL coach

Time to put Smith at RG. In the NFL he is a G. He is a good run blocker and it would be much easier for him to pass block at gaurd. Then maybe he plays a whole season. Time to PAY Collins and put him at RT. Collins has proved he can play at a high level.Pay the man and start him. Spend some GOOD doe in FA and get you a STARTING LG. This is the best thing the Bengals can do for Andy and the running game. Last bring in a OL coach that can see talent and put it together cause i dnt believe Alexander can do that. The Bengals have let alot of OL talent walk out the door.

by i am will on Jan 16, 2012 3:41 PM EST reply actions  

I kinda agree. I would put Andre back on the left side of the line at LG

Start Collin at LT, bring Bobby back for a year if he is healthy and draft DeCastro. I would keep Boling and Hudson for another shot. Mcglynn and Livings just need to go. Get Richardson and DeCastro, make these changes and I think it is possible tha tmany of our Offensive problems go away, especially with Shipley coming back as all reports say he is way ahead of schedule on his recovery and should be like new wnen he comes back.

I am not sure that Alexander is the problem but I do know he is responsible for making some terrible decisions. The only one that he has made that I really liked was putting Cook at C. L like Cook. He is smart and mean and tough. That is what a center needs to be.

"If we always agree, one of us is not necessary"

by JUNGLEJOHN on Jan 16, 2012 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

+10000

"What we do in this life echoes in eternity"

Maximus*

by gratefulmax on Jan 16, 2012 5:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Right On!

Alexander forced Livings in the lineup for 2 years over Mathis. That alone is reason to be fired in the NFL. Beyond that, we need some new schemes. The Steelers, Ravens, and pretty much every NFL team know exactly how we block runs and passes.

If I were calling the shots I’d let Bobby, Nate, and McGlynn walk. The best way to get Collins in the starting lineup is at OG. He’s more athletic and can get out on corner to seal block better than Smith. No doubt a free agent veteran OG next to Whit could really help us.

As for the running game. Let Benson walk for sure. Draft an RB but not Richardson. He’s not the guy you want in AFC North. He’ll be out injured all the time. I’m still trying to figure out who we should go after in Draft. I do think Peerman has the skills and passion to carry the load and catch passes. I can’t for life of me understand why we don’t run sets with Leonard at FB and Scott or Peerman at RB — sending all of them out on passing routes a la NO Saints.

by Jim Spann on Jan 16, 2012 10:31 PM EST up reply actions  

O-line is our biggest weakness on offense

It’s time for Mikey to loosen the purse strings and go get us a starting G in FA. Benson lost like 15 lb’s this offseason and it hurt him. He was not the punishing rusher we expected and hoped for, nor was he ever a dazzling slasher. But like someone here said,“If we had good line ANY back could rush for 3 a carry”. So an upgrade here is a must, before we even worry about who lugs the rock.

by keithster on Jan 16, 2012 4:07 PM EST reply actions  

Bring Benson back

We need his speed,vision, tackle breaking and receiving ability. At the least keep him around as a motivator on the sideline.
Upside everywhere you look with # 32

by ExNFLScout on Jan 16, 2012 4:32 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

I think you're being sarcastic, but I'm not sure.

Considering that he has none of the attributes you just listed, I’m going to go ahead and continue thinking that.

by Animal_Like_Football on Jan 16, 2012 4:48 PM EST up reply actions  

i'm sorta done defending alexander

its not a screaming for his head every season thing, its a we tried this for 18 years and its been awhile since its been working thing. lets put it out of its misery.

it would be different if someone had the power to unstick alexander’s feet when he sets them, however, looking at the mathis and collins situations, it’d be foolish to assume anyone on the team above alexander will challenge him on his decisions.

"the bengals are not a west of the 104 longitude team."

by palewook on Jan 16, 2012 4:36 PM EST reply actions  

Wishful thinking here

Hopefully, when Jay Gruden signed his extension part of the deal was that they had to get rid of Benson and Alexander and let him and Marvin bring in another player and coach that they choose

by biggie22 on Jan 16, 2012 4:42 PM EST up reply actions  

People are clamoring for a combination of Trent Richardson and DeCastro. I would love that also but I think even if Richardson slips,I think Decastro stock is shooting up. I think Richardson will be a good pro and he is the better reciever now but I think Lamar Miller will be the best back out of this draft. He is a decent reciever but he can work on that. I like Miller because he is a game changer. He has great speed and a great build for a running back. For a speed back he is willing to take on and break tackles,he was only tackled for a loss 3 times last year and he is great in pass protection. Go to youtube and watch his highlight tape. Pair him with a bigger back and it will drastically change how teams defend us.

by EPK1979 on Jan 17, 2012 12:59 AM EST reply actions  

He reminds me of a young Clinton Portis before the knee injury

by EPK1979 on Jan 17, 2012 1:00 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Cincinnati Bengals.

Editor-In Chief

Cj_small Josh Kirkendall

Editor/Managing Editor

Rudiblanket_small Anthony Cosenza

5255_133614603784_666578784_2414703_1976100_n_small Jason Garrison

Authors

Photo_3_small BeerRun

010511170110_small Joe Goodberry

40297_422933299865_509514865_4658259_6466915_n_small Ryan Harper

Small Brennen Warner

Sb_nation_small Jack Cassidy

580551_10150822857707018_613867017_11694254_1239726425_n_small Nick_Crago

Img_0783_small Mike Fightmaster

Moderators

Nfl palewook

680764146_0eac16fabd_small 80%OFTHETIMEIMRIGHTEVERYTIME

Tawky_tawny_small UpStateMike

Joeb698_86e260_small joeb69

Bengals_stamp_by_jamaal10_small Doc Scratch