How to build a better team: Free Agency edition (plus my dream draft pick for 2012)
The Cincinnati Bengals became something that everyone thought they couldn't, a playoff team with one of the youngest starting rosters in the NFL after a 4 win season a year ago. Now that the Bengals have MOST of their key players under lock, its time for Mike Brown to open up his checkbook and not only address the holes that the Texans and division rivals made clear but to upgrade at the position as well. That being said, the Bengals, in my opinion, need an upgrade at RB, WR, KR, and Safety through free agency. I'm going to spitball a couple big name free agents and you let me know your opinions...
RB:
Option A: Micheal Bush
Micheal Bush finally showed he can be the bellcow starting RB that everyone thought he could be. Entering free agency, Micheal is going to be one of the biggest free agent RB's on the market. With a chance Oakland places on the franchise tag on Bush, Mike Brown would have to bullet down and pay the man to make him come to Cincy.
Option B: Peyton Hillis
Peyton played his way out of Cleveland this year after his "superstar" antics and lack of production. There's no doubt the man can play though. Hillis is a BEAST at the RB position and is also a great option to catch the ball out of the backfield. Putting a tank like Hillis in Cincinnati's backfield would take emense pressure off of Dalton and really open up the play-action passing game.
WR/KR
Option A: Ted Ginn Jr
Tate is terrible. I know his stats aren't that bad but why does it seem like every other team in the NFL has their own return threat guy that actually makes plays and the Bengals do not? I've been watching Ted Ginn Jr since his start in Miami and to me, he is one of the fastest players in the NFL. If the Bengals are going to waste a roster position on just a kickoff returner who isn't going to get on the field then at least make the position arguable where it doesn't hurt the team as much.
Option B: DeSawn Jackson
Now hold on a second, I know your thinking NO WAY with his attitude but just imagine the offense with Jackson involved. A legitimate stretch-the-field WR to make mismatches for ANY defense in the NFL. I truly don't see this one happening and I'm perfectly okay with that but I just wanted to bring it up.
S:
Option A: LaRon Landry
LaRon Landry is one of the better strong safeties in the NFL, and that is the position where the Bengals are weakest overall. Landry was placed on injured reserve last season and has had injury issues the past few years, which will drive his price down until he can prove to stay healthy. Landry is a playmaking safety who is good at rushing the passer and excellent against the run. He forces turnovers and has a tenacity that allows him to blow up plays before they even develop. His coverage skills are on par or better than any safety the Bengals currently have on the roster. The Redskins wouldn't dare use the franchise tag on Landry given his injury issues. If the Bengals are willing to pay a little more than the Redskins and take a risk, they could be receiving a huge award. The Bengals already have a top five defense; Landry would come in and immediately upgrade the unit overall.
Option B: Micheal Griffon
Michael Griffin is one of those players you never know what to expect from. One year he was a Pro Bowl-caliber player, and the next he dropped off the face of the earth. Defensive coordinator Mike Zimmer has made worse players look like Pro Bowlers, so Griffin should be on Cincinnati's radar. Griffin had a solid season last year, finishing with 75 tackles, one forced fumble and two interceptions. He is solid against both the run and pass, and matches up well against tight ends—a position Cincinnati was killed by all season long. Griffin is an oddball, but if the Bengals aren’t able to bring back Reggie Nelson, Griffin would be a good option to fill the void.
As a side note, I am a big supporter of the Bengals grabbing a CB and Lamar Miller through the first round of the NFL draft. Here is a little information on Miller through BR.
Miller is of similar height and size to Chris Johnson, standing at 5'11" and weighing 212 pounds. As a redshirt sophomore this season, Miller ran for 1,272 yards, making him the first Hurricane to reach 1,200 yards since Willis McGahee in 2002, and clocked nine touchdowns for the year.
The main selling point for the Bengals will be the speed and agility of Miller. He can put his foot on the gas and beat defenders with ease, and makes great cut-backs when necessary. His pace and ability to dance around the defense are completely different traits to the freight-train style of play that Benson utilized and could be a nice change of pace for Cincy, whose running style has become painfully predictable. Miller's awareness is almost as impressive as his speed, and his ability to change direction and turn nothing into something is worth commending. Too often did Benson get stuffed in the backfield in 2011. The Bengals need a new approach to running the ball, and unfortunately, Benson's physical attributes don't fit the mold. It must also be considered that the offensive line Miller played behind in Miami was less than spectacular, making the success of Miller that much more impressive. With Andy Dalton still getting used to his receivers, Miller can serve as yet another pair of hands downfield, as well as a back. With 17 receptions and a TD through the air in 2011, Miller has proven that his skill set isn't limited to running the football. If A.J. Green is going to spend a lot of time in double coverage and Jerome Simpson isn't going to be the next go-to guy, then Miller can provide an extra point of attack for this young offense.The question will come down to whether Lewis and Gruden want to move away from the downfield style running game that Benson brought along. If they decide they want to, they will have to assess whether or not Bernard Scott can be their guy. If he isn't, Miller can be, and will have the opportunity to take the Bengals running game to new levels. If the Bengals decide they want to continue pounding the rock, they may look at bringing in Michael Bush from Oakland, and simply have Scott's role increased. With the 17th pick, courtesy of the Oakland Raiders and their own 21st pick in the first round, the Bengals are in prime position to take Miller. While draft speculators have flip-flopped between having the Bengals take a CB or an OT with one of their picks, most have allocated one to the taking of an RB. However it comes to be, the Bengals running game is in for an overhaul in 2012, and will be one of the big storylines to watch as we look forward to the the draft and free-agency.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Cincy Jungle's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Cincy Jungle's writers or editors.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Where is the O line help we so desperately need?
You can’t draft a running back before a stud O lineman when you have two big holes on the line. Not even Barry Sanders could run with the O line we currently have.
What do you do when there's no way out? Find a way to get deeper in it.
by jimbasa on Jan 17, 2012 8:25 AM EST via mobile reply actions
Jim, we are on almost the same page.
If the RB is special you have to take him. Especially if the current RB on your roster is not so special. Generally, IMO, you are right. The Oline is a top priority. But, to be honest there just aren’t that many Oline guys – especially Gs – who are so special that they are worth a 1st round pick. Baluga (sp?) of GB maybe, but for every 1st rounder like him you see other 1st rounders like Iupati who was traded his sophmore year. He probably was really only a 2nd round talent. If you do your homework and you have the Oline expertise you can find very good Gs in the 2nd or 3rd. Our problem is I am not sure Alexander has that expertise and we have just picked poorly in the Oline front – or so it seems. We have a couple of guys who may just come around.
"If we always agree, one of us is not necessary"
I'd say that the only RB I'd take in the 1st is Richardson.
To me it’s a pretty deep draft for RB’s, we can find guys like Cyrus Gray, Doug Martin, David Wilson, Chris Polk, in the 2nd or 3rd round. Getting a premiere guard is paramaunt when you have a rookie QB. We need to protect our franchise QB and when you are set with tackles but have big holes at guard, then you gotta take an elite guard. Even more so with an extra 1st round pick.
What do you do when there's no way out? Find a way to get deeper in it.
Like I said, I am with you. But, is there a dead lock guarentee G out there in the draft
and if there is I would spend one of the firsts on him, depending on who else is available in another position of need. If we are going to take the next step toward being one of the best teams we cannot afford to miss on these first two picks. They need to be in a position of need and they need to start immediately and they need to be potential future probowlers – or at least close. I realize that the draft – especially in the first round – is a relative crap shoot, but we cannot afford another Andre, who takes 3 years to contribute. The real question I pose is – do we have the expertise required to identify Oline guys who are going to come in and do a job? I have not seen it.
We have a window of opprotunity in the next two years with a solid foundation and 3 1st round, 3 2nd round and 2 3rd round picks in the next two years. That is potentially a solid upgrade in 8 positions. IMO, that is 2 RBs, 2 CBs, 2 Ss, and 2 Gs. in combination with 2-4 FA pickups in the mix to shore up those or other positions along with possible diamonds in the rough from 8 additional later round picks who might surprise us. That will make us young and talented if we play our cards right and keep the guys we want to keep whose contracts come due in that time. We could not only have a top D and O with our starters but we could also have the quality backups we need to make us relatively bullet proof. For the first time in 20 years we can actually elevate this team to be the best Bengals team possibly ever. That is why I am excited about the future and expect that is is entirely possible that we play for the SB in 2013 (2012 would be kind of a stretch). But we have to get it right.
"If we always agree, one of us is not necessary"
Ok, that is 3 3rd round picks in with probability with the Joseph comp pick.
That ia 9 players in the first 3 rounds over the next 2 years.
"If we always agree, one of us is not necessary"
I would love to get Bush...
…but I have a feeling he may be tough to land. I would be perfectly good with Hillis as well. If we got Hillis, I would still draft Miller for a “thunder and lightening” approach. Scott could end up the odd man out depending on how many backs we choose to carry.
If we got Hillis I would still draft Lamar Miller as well,
and I would have them both line up in the backfield, with Hillis as FB and Miller as HB. With both of them in the backfield the defense would need to guess at which back might get the ball on a run play, both of them are recieving threats out of the backfield, and if you send both of them out on quick routes someone is going to be open. Not to mention the playaction possibilities it opens up when you can send both of them out on a route after a run fake. Having a BIG back that can run/recieve at FB along with Miller at HB would be a great scenario that if Jay Gruden capitalized on it could make such a nasty offense.
I hope MB reads this
I swear if we signed Hillis and lets say Grubbs or any of secondary FA (Finn, Landry, Griff, Grimes) I will sell my car, new tv, all game systems, all my furniture, and anything else I can to be able to afford season tickets. I will freakin sell myself if I had to. I cant imagine anything better lookin than Hillis and miller or wilson in the backfield.
by MadManMarlett91 on Jan 20, 2012 11:55 AM EST up reply actions
Finally, someone else who thinks Hillis would be a good pickup.
3rd or 4th and short problems would diminish greatly with him in the backfield. One fun thought – could you imagine Hillis in a goal line situation with Peko as lead blocker?
"If we always agree, one of us is not necessary"
Agree--if we got Hillis...
…Pressley might be the odd man out actually. Use Hillis as a FB/HB hybrid and bring in a TE or DT to lead block.
If we are going to make this West Coast thing work, I think Hillis/Miller combo would be awesome.
Revamp RB
I think Ced is gone, but I think that Gruden would like to get Scott more involved in the offense before giving up on him. But I wouldn’t mind if they totally revamped the position with the only player coming back being Leonard.
I wouldn’t mind signing Bush or Mike Tolbert from San Diego and then drafting Miller from Miami.
Bush and Tolbert can get the tough yard and punch it into the endzone, which the Bengals desperately need. Miller gives them a breakaway threat and a guy who can also excel at returning kickoffs.
You got my vote for GM.
Just gotta work on our O line.
"Shiny. Let's be bad guys."
by KentuckianaBrowncoat on Jan 17, 2012 12:13 PM EST reply actions
haha thanks
I did just graduate with a B.S in business administration with a specialization in sports management…maybe I should send Mr. Brown my resume! I was going to include O-Line but I think it’s something the Bengals choose to rebuild through the draft/cast-away FA and not big name FA players unfortunately..
It has been said but you really need to address the guard situation
The more I think about the more I’m starting to really like the Tedd Ginn Jr option as well. He can definitely help our return game. Plus we keep saying we need a #2 WR to replace Simpson but actually we kind of need a #3 to stretch the field and although Tedd Ginn has been regarded as a bust it’s mostly because he was taking in the 1rst round as #1 (Alah Keith Rivers), I think he could be fairly descent #3, he definitely has the speed. We have AJ as our #1, Shipley coming back can be our #2 the “slot” WR and Tedd Ginn could fill in as the #3 to really stretch the field.
Almost agree
I’m with everyone else on the guard situation, but they won’t address it in the draft. I think they will sign carl nix in free agency, for our big signing this year, because there is noway new orleans is going to invest over 100 million into two guards so they wont resign nix. with a guard that will be a pro bowl caliber player every year our o-line instantly becomes a force to be dealt with. I’m with you on Bush, he’s a damn beast, but i want no part of desawn jackson, he’s selfish and i dont want him to destroy our locker room. Ginn would be a nice addition. And if we could sign Landry our secondary would be freakish, would love that
by thegrassisGREENer18 on Jan 18, 2012 11:49 PM EST reply actions

by 






















