Grading The 2011 Bengals: Cornerbacks
While the defense played well enough to finish the season with a top-10 ranking and the defensive line was the strength of the team, the secondary was the team's Achilles heel. The Bengals struggled to stop teams from passing on them at times and once Leon Hall went down with a season-ending Achilles injury and players like Adam Jones and Kelly Jennings were thrust into the spotlight, they secondary struggled even more, especially against top receivers.
Below are the grades for each of the team's cornerbacks and the unit as a whole.
Nate Clements: Clements started and played in every game this season except for one. He started opposite of Hall early in the season and then, after hall went to IR, he started opposite of Adam Jones. Clements, despite his age, played fairly well in 2011. He was especially good in run support, earning a score of 4.7, but was a liability in coverage at times, earning a pass coverage score of -5.7. Clements had an overall grade of -0.2 in 2011, which was decent but fell far short from what Johnathan Joseph could have scored (Joseph had a grade of 11.8 with a pass coverage score of 10.8 by the way).
Leon Hall: Hall played in the team's first nine games before he was placed on IR with an ankle injury. He was pretty much the exact opposite from Clements when he was on the field. Hall struggled in run support, earning a score of -1.8, but was better in pass protection with a grade of 2.0. His overall score was 1.4 and it was clear that the team missed him badly once he was gone.
Adam Jones: Jones missed the first half of the season recovering from the neck injury he suffered in 2010 but once Hall was placed on IR, Jones was made the starting cornerback opposite from Clements. This was the first time that Jones was asked to start at cornerback week in and week out since the 2008 season and through the rest of the season he struggled at times. Jones had a run support grade of -1.7 and a pass coverage grade of 0.3 for an overall grade of -2.4. Plays such as Andre Johnson's touchdown in the playoff game stand out as a testament to Jones' struggles covering good receivers.
Kelly Jennings: The Bengals traded for Jennings, a former first-round pick, before the season and hoped to use him as the team's third cornerback in passing situations. Unfortunately for the Bengals, Jennings struggled throughout the season, especially in pass coverage, which left them high and dry when Hall was injured. He had a run support score of -0.4 and a pass coverage score of -6.6 for an overall grade of -5.2.
Brandon Ghee: Ghee only played two defensive plays in Week 15 and didn't accumulate any stats. He did earn a -0.5 special teams score.
Rico Murray: Murray only played in one game this season, which was against the Browns in Week 1 and made one special teams tackle.
Jennings, Jones and Murray are all three free agents and there are no guarantees that Hall will be ready to go when the 2012 season starts and on top of all that, Clements can be a liability in coverage. There is no question that the Bengals need to address the cornerback position in the draft. If they don't, they would be really hurting themselves defensively. It's a passing league and the Bengals need a way to defend the pass. I expect them to use one of their first-round picks to grab a cornerback.
For their play in 2011, the Bengals cornerbacks earn a grade of D.
What grade would you give them?
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Overall C
HAll and Clements were doing great most of the year minus a few struggles
Nelson did good at FS
everyone else… well we had no one else
D sounds right
The good news is FA and the draft is rich in quality CB’s. This is one area they can get better real quick. Probably let Pacman go, then sign 2 FA CB’s with one of them starter ready. Then draft one in the first two rounds.
Streets Rating:
sub mothaf_____g par Dawg…………
"In a battle between patience and power, patience always wins"
Weakest Part of the Squad
Definitely need an upgrade next year. Even more so than the O-Line
It's the same, only different
D seems a little harsh
I might give them a “C.” If they were really “D” material, I don’t think this defense would have been a top 10 unit.
by Animal_Like_Football on Jan 26, 2012 5:31 PM EST reply actions
Top 10 is overrated
Its biased towards the weak team the Bengals played early in the schedule. I’d rather the rank be calculated against the good teams, the winning teams and the playoff teams. That is who they must beat to advance in the playoffs.
Against those types of teams, our defense was C at best.
Got to get much better with the next 11 sent out to start on defense next season.
But you can't throw out the bad teams any more than you can throw out the good teams.
That’s what rankings are. They were top 10 in both yards allowed and points allowed. So I’d say that’s a pretty accurate description.
I agree with you that the D needs to get better. It’s not dominant. It can’t take over games. But I wouldn’t discount it either. It’s the reason they were able to keep scores close enough to win 9 games this year.
by Animal_Like_Football on Jan 26, 2012 5:59 PM EST up reply actions
is it me or are these position ratings are a little off
if our CBs were bad, our LBs except for were slightly below average and our dline graded average, except for one… how the hell were we a top 10 defense? lol
AMAS
Top 10 defense gives false comfort
If it was truly a top 10 defense why did Baltimore and Houston rip it apart in the last two games of the season? That shouldn’t happen to a “top 10 defense”.
This defense needs lots of help on the line and secondary. I’d love to see someone like Upshaw as a LB, but other areas are crying louder for help.
well to be in the top 10 in defense for the whole year says something about the unit... I wouldn't just blow it off
But Baltomore should have won that game…. their offense and kicker let them down… and Houston had their 3rd string qb in…. he was eventually going to lose agaisnt a veteran team.
But agree about upshaw, that would be freaking nice. Too bad were old at CB and we need defenately need an upgrade at SS.
AMAS
No, no, I don't mean the Baltimore vs Houston game
I mean the Baltimore vs Cincy game and the Houston vs Cincy games to end our season. Birds and Texans trashed out defense. Kicked their butts good. Ran all over the line and didn’t pass much because they didn’t need too.
That is not what a top 10 defense does.
Let's not forget
There were several times our CB’s were beat but they were expecting over the top help and crocker was no where to be found
Hmm, well I suppose if we look ONLY at the cornerbacks, I could manage to give them a D-. They didn’t quite fail completely, but they were ridiculously close.
If you do the secondary as a whole, I have to give them an F. They sucked. They weren’t actually quite as bad as our “bad” receivers (Simpson/Caldwell). On the other hand they didn’t have much of any really good highlight plays to make up for their normal suckiness.
If we can’t find two good corners AND a good safety in the draft, we better hope the DL is even better next year or we’re going to be back to a losing season again.
D
And Leon Hall was clearly always #2 to JJo.
They signed the wrong guy.
And now he’s got the kind of injury some don’t come back from.
Attention Mike Brown: One-and-done doesn’t cut it. You will see more empty seats next year if you don’t show the fans you’re trying to win the Super Bowl!
by occams_tiger_teeth on Jan 26, 2012 8:53 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Agree with the D
Seeing how the line was the best its ever been in my memory.
For as many times as i witnessed Pacman sidestep running backs,i have no idea how he scored only a -1.7
Maybe they dont count that as run support
"A team is more than a group of individuals,its a group of individuals that come together to make a team"
C--
Hall is the only quality CB on the team. The rest are/were mediocre at best. Some teams can make up for subpar CB play by having really good safeties, but the Bengals lack in that position too. Nelson was serviceable, Crocker was awful.
Losing Joseph should have been a crime punishable by incarceration.

by 


























