Group Of U.S. Senators Approach FCC About NFL's Blackout Policy
We've been keeping an eye on the developments of the actions of certain parties that oppose the NFL's "Blackout rule". About a month ago, the FCC came out and said that they will reconsider the policy this offseason because of the many complaints from fans. Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown has been the most public figure in opposition to this policy and has been active in gathering support to his cause. After all, Cincinnati was responsible for six of the 16 total blackouts in 2011.
Despite that report from the FCC a few weeks back, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell proclaimed that the league is standing firm with the rule, claiming that the blackouts "have served the league well over the years" and "they want the stadiums filled." As it currently stands, the league works with the FCC to enact the policy.
Senator Brown has apparently been successful in garnering support to end the blackout rule, as four other U.S. Senators recently wrote a letter with Brown to the FCC.
Joining Brown were Senators Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, Tom Harkin of Iowa, Debbie Stabenow of Michigan and Frank Lautenburg of New Jersey, respectively.
"These blackouts are ruining the experience of rooting for the home team and are unjustly hurting fans," the senators wrote. "That many of these stadiums were constructed or remodeled using taxpayer dollars underscores the disservice done to fans by blackouts."
We'll see if this banding together of Senators against this cause will actually sway the FCC to ultimately rule against the blackout policy. It's obviously another step in the process of a group representing the interests of their respective constituencies. You can find the full letter from the five Senators here (courtesy of Profootballtalk.com).
You can also find out more about the blackout rule and its effects from www.endblackouts.com, a site run by Cincy Jungle friend, Brian Frederick.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hell yeah they should reconsider it.
What would the Nfl be without the fans?
1st RD-Dre Kirkpatrick-CB
1st RD-Cordy Glenn-OG
2nd RD-Brandon Thompson-DT
3rd RD-Amini Silatolu-OG
4th RD-Marvin Jones-WR
5th RD-Marquis Maze-KR
FA:
SS-Laron Landry
RB-Micheal Bush
i don't get it
San Francisco had a black out once and everybody is worried that they will get a black out in their stadium.
I call it a freak accident.
And I am being sarcastic.
AMAS
Took me a minute
Until I remembered what article I was on lol
by Oregonbengalsfan on Feb 15, 2012 1:11 PM EST up reply actions
lol i do that all the time
the post starts one topic and then evolves to something that has notthing to do with the article lol
AMAS
Owners Fans and TV
Owners want a Blackout to use the press to warn the population that if there is no sellout,We the Owners have our hands tied. We the Owners have no choise by rule to do other. We cant lift the Blackout even if we wanted to.
Fans are not so dumb. Fans have expectations of Fair Play. Blackout Rule is one sided.
What does TV want. Do they want to BlackOut a game and lose Renenue.
The Question is. Can the Owners CONSPIRE to restrain FREE TRADE?
Who owns the airways?
Who denies free access?
Who benefits?
Who loses?
Fans and TV lose. BY RULE, WE THE OWNERS HAVE NO CONTROL OVER BLACKOUTS. What a bunch of bull. Talk about a self a serving rule?

by 
























