2012 Franchise Tag Numbers And The Bengals

For those of you who don't know, the new CBA has changed the way the franchise tag works. Josh broke it down like a high-priced lawyer in an earlier post, but basically what he meant is for the team to use the exclusive free agent tender on a player, they need to drop a sweaty wad of cash in that player's hand.


Related: New Franchise Tender Rules

There are 27 Bengals free agents, 20 of which are unrestricted, heading into the offseason and the team will undoubtedly try to re-sign some of them. Some of the players that they will try to re-sign will include Mike Nugent, Reggie Nelson, Manny Lawson, Pat Sims and a few more.

It's doubtful, at least to me, that the team uses the franchise tag on any of these guys, but just in case, let's look at what they would have to spend on certain players.

Position 2012 Franchise Tag Value*
2011 Franchise Tag Value
Quarterback
$16.1 million $14.4 million
Running Back
$7.7 million $9.6 million
Wide Receiver
$9.4 million $11.4 million
Tight End
$5.4 million $7.3 million
Offensive Line
$9.4 million $10.1 million
Defensive End
$10.6 million $13 million
Defensive Tackle
$7.9 million $12.5 million
Linebacker
$8.8 million $10.1 million
Cornerback
$10.6 million $13.5 million
Safety
$6.2 million $8.8 million

So let's say they feel like they may need to apply the tag to Reggie Nelson to keep him around. In 2011, Nelson made $957,500, so a jump from slightly less than $1 million to $6.2 million for one year would be massive and way too much.

How about Manny Lawson? In 2011, he made $3 million on a one-year contract. Again, a jump from a one-year, $3 million to a one-year, $8.8 million is way too much. Not going to happen.

Then there's Pat Sims. The jump from the $555,000 that Sims made in 2011 is $8.8 million. That's one hell of a pay increase and even though I like Sims, he's not worth it. So that's a no.

Some of you may be worried about the team losing Anthony Collins, but he also made $555,000 in 2011 and the $8.8 million pay raise for a one-year contract if the team used the tag on him would be way too much of a price to pay to keep him around.

So after looking through all of the free agents that the Bengals stand to lose, there isn't one of them that is worth the money that a franchise tag would guarantee them. If they were forced to use the tag, I would say they should use it on kicker Mike Nugent (and of course we don't have the number for kickers), but I don't even think that will happen.

But it's not important what I think. What do you think?

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Cincy Jungle

You must be a member of Cincy Jungle to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Cincy Jungle. You should read them.

Join Cincy Jungle

You must be a member of Cincy Jungle to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Cincy Jungle. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9341_tracker