The groups of players comprise the same total positions: 1 OT, 1 RB, 1 WR, 1 DE, 1 CB, 2 LB
.
GROUP A
OT – Andre Smith...27 games, Car AV = 2
RB – Kenny Irons...0 games
WR – Jerome Simpson...71 rec, 1004 yd, 7 td
DE – Michael Johnson...59 tkl, 1 int, 11.5 sacks
CB – Leon Hall...222 tkl, 20 int, 0 sacks
LB – Keith Rivers...120 tkl, 2 int, 2 sacks
LB – Rey Maualuga...132 tkl, 3 int, 2 sacks
1006 total yards, 7 total td’s
540 tkl, 26 int, 15.5 sacks
.
GROUP B
OT – Ryan Clady...64 games, Car AV = 33, 1 pro-bowl, 1 all-pro season
RB – Ray Rice...6,612 total yards, 29 total td, 2 pro-bowls
WR – Mike Wallace...171 rec 3206 yards, 24 td, 1 pro-bowl
DE – Charles Johnson...119 tkl, 0 int, 30.5 sacks
CB – Jarius Byrd...166 tkl, 13 int, 2 sacks, 1 pro-bowl
LB – Clay Matthews...131 tkl, 4 int, 29.5 sacks, 3 pro-bowls, 1 all-pro
LB – Lamar Woodley...169 tkl, 4 int, 48.0 sacks, 1 pro-bowl
9962 total yards, 53 total td’s
598 tkl, 21 int, 110 sacks
.
.
So what is the main difference between Group A and Group B?
Group A is drafting by NEED
Group B is drafting by Best Available
The top 2 picks in 2007 were L Hall #18 and K Irons #49
But could have been L Woodley (46) and C Johnson (83)
.
The top 2 picks in 2008 were K Rivers #9 and J Simpson #46
But could have been R Clady (12) and R Rice (55)
.
The top 3 picks in 2009 were A Smith #6, R Maualuga #38, M Johnson #70
But could have been C Matthews (26), J Byrd (42), M Wallace (84)
.
In each draft, when they went after a need, they handcuffed themselves from taking the best player available at that position the next year, but had to fill another need, and missed out on the top players.
.
Had they taken OT in 2008 (when it wasn’t a need) they wouldn’t have to reach for Andre Smith in 2009.
Had they not reached for Andre Smith in 2009, they could have taken Clay Matthews.
Had they taken Clay Matthews, they wouldn’t have needed to take Rey Maualuga.
Had they not reached for Simpson at WR in 2008, they could have taken Wallace in 2009
Had they not reached for Irons in 2007 they could have taken Rice in 2008
Etc..., etc..., etc...
.
The point being that when you draft for need, you may fill an immediate perceived weakness, but you are short-selling yourself and limiting your ability to take the best players available that may fall to you in subsequent drafts. Also by filling needs, you pass over better players because they may not be seen as an immediate need, but ultimately taking these better players will improve your team.
.
Conclusion being if you want the better team, you have to take the better players (best available).
Poll
i prefer
drafting to fill needs (15 votes)
drafting to take the best players available (78 votes)
cookies (21 votes)
114 total votes


There are 47 Comments. Load Now.
Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.
C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read
R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next
Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read
Comment Settings
Live comment alert: Hide it!
Comments for this post are closed.