Buy or Sell: Reasons why Robert Sands was released

November 20, 2011; Baltimore, MD, USA; Cincinnati Bengals safety Robert Sands (31) prior to the game against the Baltimore Ravens at M&T Bank Stadium. Ravens beat the Bengals 31-24. Mandatory Credit: Mitch Stringer-USA TODAY Sports

The Cincinnati Bengals released Robert Sands on Wednesday. We examine the possible reasons for his termination.

During the offseason, teams are allowed a maximum of 90 players, which includes unsigned draft picks. With the release of Robert Sands on Wednesday, Cincinnati now has 89 players on their active roster. Naturally this invites discourse.

Sands was released to send a message.

Knowing what you know about the Bengals, do you really buy this? Sands was arrested for allegedly striking his wife in January. Considering this incident took place seven months ago, reacting to Adam Jones' legal entanglement by releasing Sands just seems petty.

"Well, Jones was arrested again so let's find the most insignificant player and release him because he got into trouble seven months ago. That'll teach 'em."

If the Bengals really wanted to send a message, they'd release Jones, the actual culprit to whatever message the team wants sent. So, the reasoning doesn't really stick and players are bright enough to see through that facade anyway.

It's entirely possible that something new happened with Sands that hasn't been made public yet. But we can hardly react to unsubstantiated supposition.

VERDICT: Sell

Sands was released because he wasn't in their plans.

This I would have believed if the Bengals were cutting 15 players today to lower their 90-man roster to 75. While obvious that Sands didn't factor on the 53-man roster, the Bengals wouldn't release him on that philosophical measure alone.

Additionally, the release of Sands leaves six safeties on the board which could impact the need for bodies during training camp. If we include Nate Clements as a safety last year, the Bengals started training camp with seven safeties in 2012. The two years before that, Cincinnati had at least eight. Even if Sands wasn't in the team's plans (many players aren't anyway), they still could have used him.

VERDICT: Sell

Sands was released to make room for an addition.

The most logical assumption at this point, though we wouldn't be surprised if the Bengals just found a better safety on the free agent market. We're not going to conjecture names (Kerry Rhodes), but the Bengals won't wait long to reload the roster with a 90th player.

VERDICT: Buy

QB 4 DE 7
RB 6 DT 6
FB 2 LB 13
WR 11 CB 10
TE 5 S 6
OT 6 PK 2
OG 5 P 1
C 3 LS 2
X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Cincy Jungle

You must be a member of Cincy Jungle to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Cincy Jungle. You should read them.

Join Cincy Jungle

You must be a member of Cincy Jungle to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Cincy Jungle. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9341_tracker