Cincy Jungle: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Cal RB Jahvid Best Seriously Injured, Carted Off Field

Multiple reasons why the Bengals can't rush the football anymore

If there's one thing the Cincinnati Bengals have had, it's a decent roster of running backs -- names like Corey Dillon (three Pro Bowls and 45 TDs w/ Cincinnati), Ickey Woods (15 TDs in 1988), Pete Johnson (one Pro Bowl and 76 rushing TDs), James Brooks (four Pro Bowls w/ Cincinnati), Larry Kinnebrew (44 rushing TDs) and Paul Robinson (two Pro Bowls). Some of you have seen every one of them, but most of you should know the names of each one. Through 39 completed seasons, the Bengals have ranked in the top-ten rushing 15 times -- including the league best in 1988 and 1989.

Fast-forward: In 2003, the Bengals were in the midst of a culture overhaul replacing hopelessness with hope. Some people, notably Dillon and Takeo Spikes, weren't interested in change. They only wanted a one-way ticket... anywhere. At the time, who could blame them? We were awful and they wanted to win before they hung it up. Dillon found a home, a Super Bowl ring and career numbers with New England. Takeo Spikes played four seasons with Buffalo going 27-37 finding himself on Monday Night for the first in 2007 (with the Eagles) -- the Bengals played on MNF four times since Spikes left.

It appeared that the upswing of the franchise's culture change would remember our rushing roots with balanced production.

Dillon saw his production fall in 2003 after suffering nagging injuries with the rising of another. With only 215 carries, Rudi Johnson recorded games of 182 (Houston, on 43 attempts), 165 (Kansas City) and 174 (San Francisco) yards rushing. Johnson went on to record 12 touchdowns in each of the next three seasons.

The young man that complicated Dillon's playing time in 2003, now holds the franchise record for most rushing yards (1,458 in 2005) and most rush attempts in a single-season (361 in 2004). He was quickly climbing the all-time franchise marks. At one point, Rudi was on pace to hold most of the franchise rushing records. Now, he's likely to fall short -- unless 2006 and 2007 are aberrations -- seeing the significant portion of his career production behind him.

Did you know: In 1988, the Bengals rushed for 2,612 rushing yards in 16 games (163.3 per game). That pales in comparison to 1969 when the team rushed for 2,651 yards in 14 games (189.4 per game).

So, 2007. Many question the play-calling of Bob Bratkowski. Since 2001, when Bratkowski became the offensive coordinator, the Bengals best ranking rush offense was 11th in 2005. They've been outside the top-15 three times and ranked 26th in 2006 -- they've hovered around the bottom-10 nearly all of 2007. Bratkowski has also been the offensive coordinator with the Seattle Seahawks and the offensive coordinator for the Miami Hurricanes championship seasons in 1989 and 1991. He's sustained success with conference (NCAA) and division titles (Bengals, 2005). Ironically, in four seasons as Seattle's offensive coordinator, three seasons finished at 8-8. It's an unconnected thought, but interesting to me.

I believe there is a point made with the play-calling. At the same time, you have to execute. The offensive line, between 2004 and 2005 (when Rudi was the most successful) was stable. Rudi Johnson finished with 4.0 yards per carry in 2004 and 4.3 in 2005 converting a total 152 first downs and recording 12 20-yard runs or more. Stability means more with the offensive line than any other unit in any other sport. Look at the offensive line breakdown.

O-Line Games
Rich Braham 25
Eric Steinbach 32
Bobbie Williams 32
Levi Jones 31
Willie Anderson 32

Since then, we've had several different starters in 26 games. Of which, no one has started every game.

O-Line Games
Bobbie Williams 22
Willie Anderson 21
Eric Whitworth 21
Eric Ghiaciuc 19
Eric Steinbach 16*
Levi Jones 11
Stacy Andrews 10
Alex Stepanovich 3
Rich Braham 2

* All in 2006. Now with Cleveland.

That's one of several factors, I believe, contributing to Rudi Johnson's depreciation. Could it be the biggest? Honestly, I could accept that. Something else to consider. The fact that two running backs are out, with only Kenny Watson (before acquiring DeDe Dorsey) on the roster, could be forcing Rudi to play rather than recover. In other words, he could still be hurt but playing because we lack the depth at running back.

I think his body overhaul, losing weight and adding muscle backfired on him. He doesn't fire through holes -- when they're there -- like he used to. He hesitates. One has to wonder that if the team changed the rushing point of attack because of Rudi's added speed on the edges -- which hasn't produced anything. The offensive line in the past two seasons has been average when they were one of the league's best in the two seasons before that.

With Kenny Watson, Kenny Irons and Chris Perry all on the horizon for 2008, is Rudi Johnson's career in Cincinnati over?

0 recs  |  Comment 2 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Is Rudi's Time Up?
It very well could be. I agree, Josh, he doesn't look like the same back this season. He used to take the ball and hit the line; if he got stopped he kept his feet moving. He was a very traditional, three-yards-and-a-cloud-of-dust mauler. Every couple dozen tries he'd pop a big run, usually because the o-line provided a gaping hole. He didn't have a lot of speed, but again he'd keep his feet moving and it took a couple guys in the secondary to bring him down. Great, great effort was his hallmark.

Now he grabs the ball and stops. Dances. Puts a hand on the back of a lineman and pushes. Watson shows far more zip taking the handoff and accelerating into the melee. Really, without the 110% effort we saw in past years, he's only borderline even as a backup.

Was it the new, svelt physique? Or maybe we're just seeing the wear and tear of multiple 5,000-carry seasons? Injury? Maybe but he seemed off ever before he got dinged. And if he is starting to hit a point where he's more injury prone, then his durability -- another strength his backers have always cited -- also comes into question.

Finally, there's the money issue. In salary cap terms, Rudi is eating up more than $5 million -- something like the 6th highest charge on the team. That number will almost certainly rise in 2008. That's a lot to ask for a back who's on pace for about 500 yards this year. Meanwhile, were the Bengals to trade or release him in 2008, they should net about $3 million in cap savings.

But...who's the alternative?

Kenny Irons? I'm sure he will be back at some point next season, but will he be 100%? On top of that, the book on him coming out of the draft was that he was good, but certainly no one was calling him a stud. Is he a guy who can handle 20, 25, 30 carries a game?

Chris Perry? Dare the team count on him to stay healthy? And how much of him is left after all those injuries? Did he use up everything he had at Michigan?

And what if Darren McFadden is on the board when the Bengals pick next April? Can you imagine the squeals of outrage in Bengaldom if they draft a first-round RB!?!

The Bengals are going to have to make a call on Rudi early next year. But I'll be damned if I know which way they should -- or will -- jump.

by BeerRun on Nov 19, 2007 4:17 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

can't run the ball
Not sure about the runner - Rudi, Kenny, Chris or Kenny.  I do know that the O-Line isn't what it used to be.  It's not fair to compare them to New Englands, as those guys are the class of the league.  But it seems like our guys aren't very athletic; no pulling plays, no forward push, etc.  I think their sole concern is protecting Carson (which is very important, but only half the job).  

Very interesting points about Bratkowski and the play calling.  It's very evident in the red zone.  As frustrated fans, we want an explanation for the poor performance.  Coaches says it's the players that committ penalties, drop passes, run bad routes, and miss blocks.  But coaches must utilize the players and circumstances that are present.  Somehow Green Bay is winning without a powerful running game.  Are their players significantly better than the Bengals?  Or is the play calling tailored to the players they have?  Whatever the reason, the current program isn't working very well.  I don't want improvement, I want wins.  I don't care how many points we score, just win.  I don't care about injuries, just win.  That's what good teams do.

by BenZoo on Nov 19, 2007 9:59 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Cincinnati Bengals.
Start posting about the Bengals »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Infighting_small
Week 9 Preview: Too Many Aces
Sweet_headband_small
Joey "Pink Taco" Flacco chased by Bengals
Small
Fan bar thread
Bruce-treetops1_small
Ask Baltimore Beatdown: Here We Go Again
Infighting_small
The Fall Of Rome
Er_small
What WOULD it take, really?
Small
written on nbc sports-report card time
Jailbot_small
T.J. Who? Sleeping in Seattle
_pbs2263--nfl_medium_540_360_small
Broncos fans kicked out of Ravens stadium for standing
Tsgibbons_small
Top 10 Facts About Chad That He’s Saving For The Sequel.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Turf Show Times
Random Ramsdom: Nov 9th, 2009
Behind the Steel Curtain
BTSC Weekly NFL Musings - Week 9 Edition
Blogging The Boys
Understudy Sunday: the Cowboys Outslug the Eagles 20-16

Managers

Atari_small Kirkendall

Editors

Twitter_profile_pic_small A Pragmatic Bengals Fan

Authors

Bengals_elvis_small Mike Boyd

Small Vman in Germany

Oso-bengalslogo-animation_small Jay McDonnell

Raymualaga_small IFChris

Huber090426_440_small jsl413