Cincy Jungle: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: The Nova Blog for Villanova Fans!

Justin Smith is likely gone

Most are assuming since the Bengals didn't tag Justin Smith that they're likely letting him go to free agency. Though there is still a chance at midnight negotiations, it would also appear very unlikely the two sides will come to terms. The team started negotiations early in 2006. The two side remained so far apart, that little, if any, head way was published. It would be safe to assume the distance between the two parties are still there. In fact, of all the unrestricted free agents, little has been said about Justin Smith.

Think he's jumping the price tag so he doesn't have to stay in Cincinnati while his home-state St. Louis Rams are looking for a "pass rusher" -- if their definition of a pass rusher is a two-sack superstar. Smith's rookie season (2001) still holds his career high for most sacks in a season (8.5).

If Smith is never characterized as a pass rusher, then the defensive end's perception goes up. He's versatile enough to play zone coverage -- mostly in the flats against tight ends or running backs. Smith had two picks his rookie season and he's good for between 2-3 pass deflections each year. Strong as an ox with a motor that would make John Randle proud, Smith's biggest problem in Cincinnati were the 10+ sack-sack season expectations.

The Steelers played with the idea of bringing him in for their 3-4 with Dick LeBeau quoted as saying he'd be a better fit in that system. Though I seriously doubt they'll pay his price tag if he doesn't drop his demands. The Rams and Buccaneers have also expressed interest.

0 recs  |  Comment 1 comment

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Re:
I can see the likelihood of a defense change due to Smith being gone but I don't see the reasoning of this signing.  I don't see past performance or current skills in Fanane that would constitute a pay increase which I presume that this is.

My thought is that if you're going to be making radical changes anyway then why sign anyone.  Unless the man has potential that is yet to be seen it's very likely to me that they gave up as good as Fanane carelessly last year and could likely pick up as good player as he this year.

I just don't see it.

by davidincincinnati on Feb 23, 2008 10:32 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Cincinnati Bengals.
Start posting about the Bengals »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Helmet_small
Bengals Draft Tim Tebow? NFL.com Mock: Jason Pierre-Paul DE
Small
for my little girl
Cincinnati_bengals_logo_small
Rant of the Day
Small
O-Line
Small
Draft
Small
More fun made of Big Ben...
Small
How are the Bengals fans gonna celebrate Paddys Day
Img_5375_small
Bengals Banter: Blustery Monday Morning Edition
Small
UPDATE: Incongnito in Cincy TODAY! Bengals looking at another menace...OL Richie Incognito
Small
Don't look now Holmgren and Browns are reloading...Quinn to Denver...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo

Florida's Joe Haden Improves Forty Yard Dash Time

Photo link

Falcons Hosting Pre-Draft Workout With Mizzou LB Sean Weatherspoon

Photo link

Bills Will Meet Pre-Draft With Texas QB Colt McCoy

More from SBNation.com >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Cincy Jungle
Which Tight End should the Bengals draft?
Field Gulls
Putting Names to Numbers: Determining What Seattle Spent to Sign Charlie Whitehurst
Bolts From The Blue
Serious Business: 3/17 Chargers Links

Managers

Atari_small Kirkendall

Img_5375_small A Pragmatic Bengals Fan

Authors

Oso-bengalslogo-animation_small Jay McDonnell

Henry152_small IFChris

Huber090426_440_small jsl413

Infighting_small Mojokong