clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Despite Jeremy Hill's struggles, Giovani Bernard excelled in 2015

New, comments

Most of the talk relating to the Bengals running game in 2015 centered around Jeremy Hill and his struggles. But, there's a positive light that should be acknowledged after a seemingly negative season for the running game.

If you buy something from an SB Nation link, Vox Media may earn a commission. See our ethics statement.

Andrew Weber-USA TODAY Sports

There's no getting around it, the Bengals had an incredibly average rushing attack in 2015. They ranked 13th in yards per carry (3.9), 13th in yards per game (112.8), and 31st in runs over 20 yards (five). Despite the passing game really finding its legs under Andy Dalton, the running game suffered because the starter, Jeremy Hill, averaged a measly 3.5 yards per run, which ranks 31st among running backs in the NFL.

It was a bad season from Hill, who started 15 regular season games. The only reason he didn't start all 16 was due to being disciplined for missing a team meeting the day before the San Francisco game. However, Giovani Bernard's impressive season seems to have gotten lost in the shuffle. A big problem with the Bengals rushing game was the fact that Bernard only started one game and took only 154 of the carries, as opposed to Jeremy Hill's 223. Bernard averaged 4.7 yards per carry, which ranked third in the NFL for running backs with at least 154 touches. It would stand to reason that he should have seen more touches to give the Bengals' rushing attack a boost, right?

Based on data from Pro Football Focus's Mike Clay on how defensive packages affected yards per carry in 2015, it seems like an accurate assessment.

Giovani Bernard's strong play was somehow overshadowed by Jeremy Hill's struggles, but Bernard was a significantly-more effective runner. His 4.8 YPC was well above expected, and his 4.9 YPC against base defenses was seventh-best in the league.

According to Clay's numbers, Bernard faced defensive packages that allowing average of 4.3 yards per carry throughout the the season. He improved on that expectation by 0.5 yards per carry, which is tied for the ninth highest in the NFL last year. For running backs with less than 200 carries, he was tied for seventh.

Here are the players who PFF calculated as having a positive "expected" YPC differential (including Bernard).

Rk Tailback Carries Actual Expected Diff
1 Thomas Rawls 147 5.6 4.2 1.4
2 Karlos Williams 91 5.5 4.2 1.3
3 Spencer Ware 85 5.5 4.2 1.3
4 Doug Martin 288 4.9 4.2 0.7
5 Le'Veon Bell 109 5.0 4.3 0.7
6 Charles Sims 106 5.0 4.3 0.7
7 Todd Gurley 226 4.9 4.2 0.6
8 Ryan Mathews 106 5.1 4.5 0.6
9 Tevin Coleman 86 4.6 4.1 0.5
10 Giovani Bernard 159 4.8 4.3 0.5
11 Mark Ingram 165 4.7 4.2 0.4
12 Darren McFadden 239 4.6 4.2 0.3
13 DeAngelo Williams 199 4.5 4.3 0.3
14 C.J. Anderson 206 4.6 4.4 0.2
15 LeSean McCoy 198 4.5 4.2 0.2


Here are the players who PFF calculated as having a negative "expected" YPC differential (including Hill).

Rk Tailback Carries Actual Expected Diff
53 Andre Williams 87 3.0 4.2 -1.2
52 Danny Woodhead 94 3.4 4.6 -1.2
51 Chris Polk 99 3.4 4.4 -1.0
50 Melvin Gordon 184 3.5 4.5 -1.0
49 Matthew Jones 144 3.4 4.3 -0.9
48 DeMarco Murray 193 3.6 4.5 -0.9
47 Jeremy Langford 145 3.7 4.4 -0.7
46 Joique Bell 88 3.4 4.0 -0.7
45 Darren Sproles 80 4.0 4.6 -0.6
44 Duke Johnson 104 3.6 4.2 -0.6
43 Jeremy Hill 232 3.5 4.1 -0.6
42 Frank Gore 256 3.7 4.3 -0.5
41 Javorius Allen 137 3.8 4.3 -0.5
40 Marshawn Lynch 117 3.7 4.2 -0.5
39 Alfred Morris 213 3.8 4.3 -0.5


Hill, on the other hand, significantly fell below his expected yards per carry. He typically faced base defenses that are designed to stop the run, while Bernard typically faced off against nickle and dime packages. However, what matters here is the expected yards per carry. Obviously, against a base defense, the expectation is a bit lower at 4.1.

Hill averaged 3.5 yards per carry when running directly out of the backfield. That's 0.6 yards per carry lower than what was expected, given the defenses he was generally facing. In a cruel reverse of what we saw from Bernard, Hill's expectation vs reality differential ranked the ninth lowest of qualified running backs and dead last out of any running backs with at least 200 carries.

What does this all mean heading into the 2016 season? Hopefully not much. Hill performed incredibly well in his rookie season. You'd like to think it wasn't a fluke and he just had a bit of a sophomore slump. After all, Bernard had a bit of a sophomore slump himself in 2014 that saw him lose his starting position to Hill.

Either way, it seems like the amount of negativity surrounding the Bengals' running game in 2015 was a bit short-sighted. Yes, the team struggled to develop the portion of the offense that helps settle things and allows them to wear down opposing defenses. It became a clear disadvantage when Dalton went down and the team had to start an inexperienced backup quarterback in AJ McCarron.

But, there's still an encouraging sign to be taken away from all of this. The Bengals have one of the most useful running back tandems in the NFL. In 2014, Bernard struggled to consistently produce and Hill stepped in to really get things going. In 2015, Hill struggled and Bernard provided a boost to jumpstart the offense. In 2016, maybe we'll see both running backs settle in and prove effective at the same time, creating a dynamic running game for Cincinnati, like what we expected to see in 2015.